Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


OKAY,

[00:00:01]

WELCOME

[Call to Order]

TO THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 25TH, 2025.

I'M CHERYL SMITH, CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING IS HERE BY CALL BACK TO ORDER AT 6:32 PM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETS THE SECOND AND FOURTH MONDAY OF EACH MONTH.

ALL MEETINGS ARE VIDEO RECORDED.

NO OFFICIAL ACTION CAN BE TAKEN UNLESS PROPER APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOLLOWS A PRINTED AGENDA THAT IS AVAILABLE ONLINE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE ROUTINE ITEMS WHICH CAN ALL BE APPROVED IN ONE MOTION.

HOWEVER, ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION MAY MAKE A MOTION TO INDIVIDUALLY CONSIDER AN ITEM FROM THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA.

INDIVIDUALS MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA.

TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM OR NOTE YOUR SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION WITHOUT SPEAKING, PLEASE FILL OUT A REQUEST TO SPEAK CARD.

THESE CARDS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTER AND SHOULD BE TURNED IN, IN, AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM PRIOR TO THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM BEING CALLED, I'LL NOW CONDUCT A ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS TO CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM.

AFTER I CALL YOUR NAME, PLEASE SAY, HERE, CHERYL SMITH.

HERE.

TY CHAPMAN.

HERE.

MALCOLM CHAARI.

HERE.

CHRISTOPHER OLEY.

HERE.

FRANK GONZALEZ.

HERE.

JANIE MENDEZ.

ARI HERE.

VICTOR MEDINA.

HERE.

JOHN FCO.

HERE.

ANGELA LUCKY V.

HERE, LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT.

YAY.

AND NOW WE WILL HAVE THE INVOCATION BY COMMISSIONER TY CHAPMAN AND THE, AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

AND, AND THE US AND TEXAS FLAG WILL BE LED BY, UH, JANIE.

ARI, I DEFERRED.

I'M SORRY.

I DO APOLOGIZE.

COMMISSIONER.

THE, UH, INVOCATION WILL BE DONE BY ANGELA.

LUCKY VONNE.

I APOLOGIZE.

SO USED TO HER DOING THAT.

GO AHEAD.

GRACIOUS.

FATHER GOD, SPIRIT OF WISDOM AND UNITY, WE GATHER HERE IN GRAND PRAIRIE, A COMMUNITY RICH WITH DIVERSITY AND SHARED PURPOSE TO SEEK GUIDANCE FOR THE DECISIONS BEFORE US.

BLESS THIS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WITH CLARITY OF MIND, COMPASSION OF HEART, AND A VISION FOR THE COMMON GOOD.

MAY OUR DISCUSSIONS REFLECT FAIRNESS, RESPECT, AND CARE FOR ALL WHO CALL THIS CITY HOME NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, GUIDE US TO SHAPE OUR COMMUNITY WITH WISDOM, ENSURING GROWTH THAT HONORS BOTH OUR HERITAGE AND OUR HOPES.

LET OUR CHOICES FOSTER HARMONY, OPPORTUNITY, AND A VIBRANT, GRAND PRAYER FOR ALL.

AMEN.

AMEN TO THE FIVE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.

ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WOULD LIBERTY I JUSTICE FOR ALL UNDER THE TEXAS FLAG TO THE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE, IN AN EFFORT TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTIONS, THE FOLLOWING MEETING GUIDELINES WILL APPLY.

THE STAFF WILL PRESENT FIRST ON ANY AGENDA ITEM.

FOLLOWING A BRIEF PRESENTATION BY STAFF, APPLICANTS WILL HAVE A COMBINED TOTAL OF 30 MINUTES TO PRESENT.

ONCE THE APPLICANT HAS SPOKEN, EACH MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO FILLS OUT A SPEAKER CARD WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM.

ADDITIONAL SPEAKING TIME MAY BE ALLOWED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRMAN BEFORE SPEAKING.

SPEAKER SHOULD GIVE THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD ALONG WITH WHOM HE REPRESENTED.

IF APPLICABLE, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON A TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA SHOULD SPEAK UNDER THE HEADING OF CITIZEN COMMENTS.

STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF EACH ITEM AT THIS TIME.

CITIZENS MAY SPEAK FOR UP TO FIVE MINUTES ON ANY ITEM, NOT ON THE AGENDA.

DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS? NO, MA'AM.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

THE

[PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA]

NEXT MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION IS APPROVING THE CONSENT AGENDA.

THERE'S ONLY ONE ITEM ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

ITEM ONE, APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 11TH, 2025 PNZ MEETING.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO ANYONE CAN SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THAT? OKAY.

UH, COMMISSIONER FCO.

MADAM CHAIR, IF I MAY, MAY I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION AND VOTE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE, THE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 11TH MEETING.

I SECOND THAT WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA BY COMMISSIONER JOHN FCO AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER FRANK GONZALEZ.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE, PLEASE.

[2. ZON-25-06-0021 - Zoning Change - Funeral Home at 310 SW 3rd (City Council District 5). Zoning Change from Multi-Family One (MF-1) to a Planned Development District for Multi Family One with a Funeral Home on 2.37 acres. Tract 60, McKinney & Williams Survey, Abstract No. 1003, and Tracts 14, 15, and 16, James G. Stevens Survey, Abstract No. 1674, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, zoned MF-1, and addressed as 310 SW 3rd Street]

[00:05:04]

UM, GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS ITEM NUMBER TWO.

THE CASE NUMBER IS ZONE, UH, 25 0 6 0 0 2 1.

THIS IS FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UM, FOR A FUNERAL HOME USE LOCATED AT THREE 10 SOUTHWEST THIRD STREET IN COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE.

UM, SO THE REQUEST OVERVIEW, THIS IS A ZONING CHANGE, WHICH HAS COME BEFORE.

UM, AND IT CAME BEFORE JUST AS A STRAIGHT ZONING CHANGE.

NOW IT'S COMING AS A PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITH BASE ZONING MULTIFAMILY ONE.

SO MF ONE.

UM, AND TO ADD THE FUNERAL HOME USE TO THAT, UM, ALLOWED USES, AGAIN, THE LOCATION IS THREE 10 SOUTHWEST THIRD STREET.

UM, THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO USE THE EXISTING CHURCH THERE AND, UM, KIND OF MODIFY IT AND USE IT AS A FUNERAL HOME.

OH, SORRY.

UM, HERE YOU CAN SEE KIND OF A AERIAL VIEW OF THE EXISTING CHURCH THERE.

UM, AND ITS SURROUNDINGS.

IT'S LOCATED THERE AT THAT INTERSECTION OF THIRD AND, UM, I BELIEVE DALLAS STREET.

UM, SO AS I MENTIONED, THE APPLICANT PROPOSES CONVERTING AN EXISTING CHURCH INTO A FUNERAL HOME WITH LIMITED INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR STAGING, VISITATION AND CHAPEL SERVICES.

ALL INTENSIVE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS, INCLUDING REMOVALS, EMBALMING, AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, WILL BE CONDUCTED AT THE APPLICANT'S EXISTING LOCATION IN IRVING.

SO I JUST WANNA MAKE THAT CLEAR THAT NONE OF THIS WILL BE TAKING PLACE AT THIS LOCATION.

THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT SEEKS TO ADD A FUNERAL HOME USE AS AN APPROVED USE TO THE EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY ONE MF ONE ZONING.

UM, DOING SO, THIS CHANGE WOULD, UM, SORRY.

THIS CHANGE WOULD AVOID A FULL REZONING WHICH COULD OTHERWISE ALLOW FOR A VARIETY OF MORE INTENSIVE AND UNSUITABLE USES FOR THIS LOCATION.

AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, UH, RECOMMENDS APPROVAL ON THIS ITEM.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? GREAT PRESENTATION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER CARDS? YES, MA'AM.

WE HAVE A CARD FROM RENEE SANCHEZ WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM.

HELLO, MRS. SANCHEZ, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

I'M RENEE SANCHEZ AND MY ADDRESS IS 1951 SOUTH STORY ROAD.

UM, I BELIEVE IN IRV, TEXAS.

I BELIEVE THE FIRST, THE FIRST ROUND THAT WENT TO THE CITY.

THEIR MAIN CONCERN WAS IF WE WERE GONNA ACTUALLY FLIP THE PROPERTY LATER ON THROUGHOUT THE YEARS.

AND I WISH I WOULD'VE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY WHERE I WOULD'VE BEEN ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO THE BOARD, WHICH, UH, I'M THE THIRD GENERATION OF THE INDUSTRY.

MY CHILDREN ARE IN THE INDUSTRY.

MY BROTHERS ARE IN THE INDUSTRY.

UM, I'VE BEEN IN THE INDUSTRY FOR 38 YEARS.

SO IT IS NOT LIKE WE WERE GOING TO, IN ORDER TO HAVE A FUNERAL HOME.

AS ANYBODY REALIZES, IT'S A TIME CONSUMING BUSINESS WHERE WE CAN'T JUST GO INTO, INTO THIS, INTO A PROPERTY FOUR OR FIVE YEARS, THEN MOVE ON WHERE OUR, OUR CLIENTELE IS BASED THROUGHOUT TIME AND TRUST.

SO I HAVE A LOCATION IN IRVIN, WHICH I'VE BEEN, I I'VE BEEN OWNING FOR, UH, ABOUT 15 YEARS.

MY FATHER HAS A LOCATION IN EL PASO, WHICH HAS BEEN OVER 38 YEARS.

UH, SO IT'S, IT'S A LONG PERIOD OF TIME THAT WE'RE GONNA BE STAYING IN THIS LOCATION.

AND, AND THEIR CONCERN WAS, WAS IT GONNA BE, THEY'RE GONNA CHANGE IT INTO, INTO A COMMERCIAL? WELL, ACTUALLY, IF EVERYBODY REALIZES THAT IT'S TO HAVE A A FUNERAL HOME, YOU CAN'T REALLY TURN INTO OTHER, OTHER BUSINESS AND EITHER A CHURCH OF OR A TO A FUNERAL HOME.

SO THIS, THIS PROPERTY WILL BE MADE IN, IN OUR HANDS FOR OUR SECOND GENERATIONS, FOR MY, ON MY BEHALF.

SO I WANT, I WANT EVERYBODY TO FEEL, FEEL FREE THAT IT SAYS THAT, NOT TO WORRY ABOUT US FLIPPING THIS PROPERTY.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

UM, I JUST HAD ONE QUESTION.

YES.

AND WHILE TURN IT OVER TO THE, UH, COMMISSIONERS, YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH THE, UH, HOMEOWNER THAT CAME TO THE MEETING? YES.

AND HOW DID THAT TURN OUT? YES.

UH, THE, THE HOMEOWNERS, UH, UH, THERE'S A SECTION TOWARDS THE BACK, WHICH, UM, THERE WERE INDIGENTS HANGING OUT THERE AND IT'S FACING TOWARDS THE BACK OF THE CHURCH.

SO I TALKED TO HER.

WE CAME INTO AN AGREEMENT WHERE I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND, AND RE UH, REMOVE THAT SECTION TOWARDS THE BACK.

'CAUSE I'M REALLY NOT USING THAT PART OF THE, OF, OF THE STRUCTURE MM-HMM .

UM, AND, AND WE, WE WORKED TOGETHER WHERE SHE WAS WORRIED ABOUT, OKAY, SO HOW, WHAT'S THE TIME OF OPERATIONS? WHAT'S GONNA BE HAPPENING DAILY? SO I'VE WENT AHEAD AND EXPLAINED TO HER AND, AND WHAT THE PLANS WERE.

MM-HMM .

AND BESIDES THAT, NO OTHER, UH, HOMEOWNERS HAVE COME TO YOU? NO.

OR YOU DIDN'T TRY TO HAVE A,

[00:10:01]

A MEETING WITH THE, UH, NEIGHBORS? NO, NOT, NOT.

OKAY.

COMMERS, WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS CASE? A COMMISSIONER CHAPMAN.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

UM, HELLO MR. SANCHEZ.

THANK YOU.

UM, I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

AM I UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PROPERTY WILL REALLY BE LIKE A CHAPEL FOR SERVICES SINCE YOU'RE NOT DOING EMBALMING? CORRECT.

AND BODY PREP? I HAVE LOCATION, WHICH IS IN IRVING.

IT'S ACTUALLY, SO IT WORKS BETTER FOR ME TO GO AHEAD AND KEEP MY STAFF SINCE I HAVE EVERY, EVERYTHING THAT I NEED ON THAT.

SO IT'S ACTUALLY BETTER FOR ME JUST TO KEEP THAT LOCATION, TO KEEP ON RUNNING DAILY OPERATIONS AND ON THE SERVICE AND THE FAMILY WAITING ON THE FAMILY, WHICH OBVIOUSLY WOULD BE, THIS BUILDING WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR US.

RIGHT.

THAT'S, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY, GROWN THE PLACE.

YES, SIR.

I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY.

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM .

VERY GOOD QUESTION.

COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, THANK YOU.

AND THANK YOU FOR, UH, TAKING THE TIME TO, TO DO THE EXTRA WORK TO GO THE EXTRA MILE.

WE DO APPRECIATE THAT.

THANK YOU.

AND GOOD LUCK ON YOUR BUSINESS.

THANK YOU.

WE HAVE NO FURTHER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM, MA'AM.

WE HAVE NO OTHER, UH, SPEAKER CARDS.

AND THIS IS IN, UH, DISTRICT FIVE COMMISSIONER, JANIE.

ARI.

YES, MA'AM.

WOULD YOU, WOULD, WOULD THAT NEED TO BE ANY DISCUSSION? ANYBODY YOU NEED ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ONE? UH, NO FURTHER DISCUSSION.

OKAY.

GO RIGHT HERE.

IF I MAY, I'D LIKE TO CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM TWO AND APPROVE PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS.

I SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE ITEM TWO BY COMMISSIONER JANIE, ARI.

AND, UM, I SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TY CHAPMAN.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE,

[3. ZON-25-06-0022 - Zoning Change/Concept Plan – Lake Ridge One Planned Development District (City Council District 4). Zoning Change from Planned Development PD-267A General Retail Uses to a Planned Development District for more specific General Retail Uses and a Concept Plan with design standards. Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Lake Ridge Addition, City of Grand Prairie, Tarrant County, Texas, zoned PD-267A, within the Lake Ridge Corridor Overlay District, and addressed as 5531 and 5523 Lake Ridge Pkwy ]

PLEASE.

MADAM CHAIR OF COMMISSION IS THIS ZONING CASE 25 0 6 22.

UH, LAKERIDGE ONE LOCATED AT 55 23 AND 55 31 LAKERIDGE PARKWAY.

THIS IS A CITY OWNED PROPERTY THAT WE DECIDED TO INITIATE A ZONING CHANGE, UH, TO ALLOW FOR A MORE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RETAIL.

UM, THE PD AS IT STANDS NOW, PD 2 67 A IS FOR GENERAL RETAIL USES, BUT THERE ARE SOME USES IN THAT, UH, DISTRICT THAT WOULD, THAT ARE ALLOWED THAT, UM, CITY COUNCIL AND OTHERS DON'T FEEL IS, UH, APPROPRIATE FOR THE SURROUNDING AREA IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UH, SO WE'RE CREATING A PD SPECIFIC FOR THIS PROPERTY THAT WOULD LIMIT SPECIFIC LAND USES, SUCH AS VARIETY STORES, VAPE SHOPS, ET CETERA.

UM, THAT WOULD BE MORE DETAILED THAN JUST A TYPICAL GENERAL RETAIL ZONE PROPERTY.

AS IT STANDS NOW.

UH, FUTURE LANES MAP CALLS FOR THIS PROPERTY TO DEVELOP THIS COMMERCIAL RETAIL OFFICE.

UH, THE ZONE CHANGES IN LINE WITH THAT.

AS I MENTIONED, IT CONTAINS DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS WITHIN THE PD.

UH, THIS AREA IS ALONG THE LAKERIDGE PARKWAY OVERLAY.

SO WITH THAT, THERE ARE APPENDIX F STANDARDS, WHICH REQUIRE A HIGHER DE LEVEL OF DETAIL WITH REGARD TO DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WILL BE IN LINE WITH WHAT'S BEING DEVELOPED AROUND THERE ALREADY.

UM, AS I MENTIONED, IT FURTHER RESTRICTS, ALLOWABLE LAND USES.

AND SINCE THE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY, WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO FURTHER RESTRICT CERTAIN LAND USES BY DEED AS WELL.

AND WE'RE LOOKING IN INTO THAT BEFORE WE, IF WE EVER SELL THE PROPERTY.

UM, WE RECEIVED 13 LETTERS IN OPPOSITION, REPRESENTING 11 UNIQUE ADDRESSES AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN.

NONE OF THEM WERE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY.

UM, MANY OF THEM NOTED THAT THEY WERE OPPOSED TO MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

AND AS NOTED, THIS IS NOT A PD OR ZONE CHANGE FOR MULTIFAMILY.

THIS IS SPECIFICALLY FOR GENERAL RETAIL, AND WE PLAN TO ADDRESS THE MULTIFAMILY COMPONENT WITH POTENTIAL DEED RESTRICTIONS IF POSSIBLE.

UH, SEVERAL LETTERS REFERENCED.

AGAIN, MULTIFAMILY, UH, NOT BEING OPPOSED.

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER FEDARKO.

RASHAD, WHY DO YOU SAY, UH, DEED RESTRICTIONS IF POSSIBLE? WE'RE LOOKING INTO THAT? I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE.

I SHOULDN'T SAY IF POSSIBLE, WE CAN DO THAT.

UM, BASED ON MY PRIOR DISCUSSIONS WITH OUR LEGAL STAFF, UM, AS Y'ALL KNOW, SB EIGHT 40 IS NEW, SO I WANNA MAKE CERTAIN THAT THAT IS A POSSIBILITY.

I DO BELIEVE IT IS A POSSIBILITY, AND I'LL LET JULIE CHIME IN.

THE KEY WITH SB EIGHT 40 IS YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO IMPOSE NEW ORDINANCES.

TRUE.

SO AADE IS NOT A ORDINANCE.

IT LAYS WITH THE LAND.

YEAH.

MY ONLY SUGGESTION, I I I SUPPORT WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND WHAT YOU WANT TO DO, JUST GIVEN WHAT CAME OUT OF THE LAST LEGISLATE, I WOULD BE VERY BROAD AND SPECIFIC IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU RESTRICT THERE, BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THE PEOPLE IN AUSTIN WANNA SOMETIMES TAKE CONTROL YES.

OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE.

COMMISSIONERS.

I, I DO WANNA STATE FOR

[00:15:01]

THE RECORD THAT I AM DISAPPOINTED THAT I'M NOT GONNA GET A REC CENTER IN DISTRICT FOUR RIGHT NOW.

I KNOW THE NUMBERS DON'T SPEAK TO THAT, BUT FOR THE RECORD, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY WE STILL WOULD LIKE A REC CENTER IN DISTRICT FOUR AND THAT, UM, SO THAT IF, IF, IF THAT EVER CAME TO BE, THAT WOULD STILL BE A POSSIBILITY FOR THAT LAND.

STILL COULD BE, REMEMBER THIS IS HERE.

COUNCILMAN LOPEZ'S DISTRICT.

MM-HMM .

UM, THIS AGAIN, WAS JUST INTENDED TO ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL OPTION TO SELL THE PROPERTY.

SO IF WE DID SELL IT, WE WANTED TO HAVE IT PREPARED MM-HMM .

TO LIMIT SPECIFIC USES.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU FOR THAT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? WE HAVE SEVERAL GILDA RILEY WISHES DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WISHES TO RECORD HER OPPOSITION.

JAMES WILL, UH, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WISHES TO RECORD HIS OPPOSITION.

SARAH WILLHITE DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WISHES TO RECORD HER OPPOSITION.

AND THAT IS, UH, ALL OF THE CARDS WE HAVE FOR THIS ITEM.

THAT BEING SAID, I'M SO GLAD THAT YOU CAME.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING AND SHARING YOUR OPPOSITION TO THAT.

THAT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE HEAR FROM THE CITIZENS.

AND, UM, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY, UH, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM BEFORE I MAKE A MOTION? AGAIN, LIKE I STATED BEFORE, THIS IS DISTRICT FOUR.

THIS IS MY DISTRICT AND I WOULD'VE PREFERRED TO HAVE, MA'AM, IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK, YOU'D HAVE TO COME FORWARD AND YOU'D HAVE TO GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO THAT QUESTION? WE, YOU WOULD HAVE TO COME UP, UP FRONT, MA'AM.

AND THEN YOU COULD HAVE TO FILL OUT A, IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY FILLED OUT A CARD, YOU'D HAVE TO, UM, FILL ONE OUT.

WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE.

THANK YOU FOR COMING.

JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND THEN YOU CAN SPEAK THERE.

GET, GET INTO THE MICROPHONE FIRST.

MA'AM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

THERESA AVILA.

26 68 ENTE.

AND THERE'S A LOT OF OPPOSITION IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

I'M SURPRISED THAT YOU ONLY HAVE 13 CARDS OR WHATEVER.

THERE WAS A LOT OF PEOPLE WRITING IN.

SO I SAID BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T SEND IT IN ON TIME.

'CAUSE IT SAID SOMETHING ABOUT A WEDNESDAY.

IF THEY WERE PRESENTED BEFORE WEDNESDAY, THEY WOULD BE ADDRESSED WITH THE MEETING.

YES, MA'AM.

THERE ARE TIME CONSTRAINTS.

CAN CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT SAVANNAH, PLEASE? WE DID RECEIVE A LOT OF OPPOSITION FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR.

AND SO, UH, FOR THIS, WE ONLY, THIS ITEM NUMBER THREE, WE ONLY RECEIVED 13 LETTERS, SO MAYBE THEY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND, BUT IN, IN EITHER CASE, UM, THIS IS JUST FOR CHANGING THE, UH, DYNAMICS OF THE SITE THAT NOTHING'S, NOTHING'S ON THE SITE RIGHT NOW.

RIGHT? NOTHING, NOTHING'S CHANGED, BUT IT IS, IT IS GOOD THAT YOU COME TO LET US KNOW THAT YOU DON'T WANT, WHAT, WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO SEE ON THE SITE.

WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE ON THE SITE? WELL, THE, THE, THE MAIN THING THAT ALMOST EVERYBODY'S SUBJECTING TO IS THE HYBRID HOUSING, WHICH IT SAYS BUILDING TO FOR RENTALS.

MM-HMM .

AND THAT AUTOMATICALLY WILL THROW OUT THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD.

I THINK OUR DIRECTOR'S GONNA SPEAK TO THAT.

I THINK SHE'S, UH, SHE'S TALKING ABOUT THE NEXT ITEM.

OH, THE NEXT ITEM.

THAT'S THE NEXT ITEM, MA'AM.

YES.

AND WE'LL GET TO THAT.

SO, BECAUSE THEY HAD PROPOSED AT ONE TIME, I DON'T REMEMBER WHEN A, UM, IT WAS LIKE A RECREATION CENTER.

MM-HMM .

YES.

AND PEOPLE, SOME PEOPLE GOT THE NEWS, SOME PEOPLE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON.

AND THEN THEY HAD A MEETING AT THE PENINSULA, AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT AFFECTS IS MY NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH IS MAR LAGOS, AND WE'RE RIGHT NEXT TO THE PLOT OF LAND.

AND NOBODY GOT A NOTICE.

AND THEN THEY SAID, WELL, WE'RE GONNA SEND YOU ALL NOTICES IN THE MAIL.

BUT LIKE, EVERYBODY KNOWS, PEOPLE GET HOME FROM WORK AND THEY JUST PICK UP ALL THE MAIL AND NEVER EVEN LOOK AT IT.

AND THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENED THIS TIME.

'CAUSE I'VE TALKED TO A FEW OF MY NEIGHBORS AND THEY'RE ALL, OH, I DIDN'T KNOW THAT.

WELL, I'M SORRY THAT THAT HAPPENED, BUT, UH, MISCOMMUNICATION DOES HAPPEN.

BUT I, I KNOW THAT IT WAS POSTED CORRECTLY AS IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN.

AND TIMELY.

IT'S, IT'S JUST HARD, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU SAID, A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR MAIL, BUT THERE'S NOTHING, THIS IS JUST, UH, THE CITY OWNS THIS PROPERTY.

I KNOW.

SO THE CITY IS JUST STATING AS TO WHAT CAN AND CANNOT BE DONE THERE.

SINCE THE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY, THERE'S NOTHING THERE NOW.

SO THERE'S NOBODY NO DEVELOPMENT AT THIS, AT THIS TIME.

RIGHT, RIGHT.

AND WE ARE HAPPY WITH THAT.

OKAY.

WE WISH IT WAS A PARK JUST TO .

YEAH, EXACTLY.

PARK FOR EVERYBODY.

THERE'S A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION ACROSS THE YEAH, IT'S GONNA BE ON THE NEXT, THE NEXT ITEM, ITEM FOUR.

OKAY.

OKAY.

NO PROBLEM.

SORRY ABOUT THAT.

YOU'RE GOOD.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR COMING.

NO FURTHER CARDS.

NO FURTHER SPEAKER CARDS.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS

[00:20:01]

ITEM MATTER CHAIR? I MAY, I JUST WANTED TO SAY I DO WANT TO THANK THOSE PEOPLE THAT CAME IN THE AUDIENCE, BUT THEY CHOSE NOT TO SPEAK.

BUT I THINK THERE'S A MISUNDERSTANDING.

'CAUSE I THINK THE, THE, THE STAFF HERE IS NOT, DOES NOT WANT IT TO BE MULTIFAMILY.

I THINK THAT MOST OF Y'ALL ARE, UH, OBJECTING TO THAT POTENTIALITY, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN HERE IF RASHAD AND HIS TEAM HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT.

THANKS FOR MM-HMM .

YES.

THANK YOU AGAIN FOR COMING.

UH, THERE BEING NO MORE FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION ON DISTRICT.

I'M SORRY, WE GONNA DO THREE AND FOUR TOGETHER? NO, IT'S TWO SEPARATE CASES.

OKAY.

SEPARATE CASES.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON ITEM THREE ZERO N 2 5 0 6 0 0 2 2 ZONING CHANGE CONCEPT PLAN.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS.

I SECOND THAT I MAKE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO, UH, CHERYL SMITH TO APPROVE ITEM THREE AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS.

ANY SECOND BY COMMISSIONER FRANK GONZALEZ.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU.

NEXT

[4. ZON-25-06-0023 - Zoning Change/Concept Plan - Lake Ridge Two Mixed Use Residential (City Council District 6). Zoning Change from Planned Development-298A for General Retail Uses to a Planned Development District allowing Single Family, Single Family-Townhome, Hybrid Housing (Build-to-Rent) and General Retail development. Tracts 1.1, 2.2, and 4, BBB & C RR Survey, Abstract No. 1700, Tracts 2B01B and 2B2, BBB & C RY Survey, Abstract no. 199, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas and Tarrant Counties, Texas, zoned PD-298A, within the Lake Ridge Corridor Overlay District, and addressed as 7566 Lake Ridge Pkwy, 1700 England Pkwy, 7315 Mansfield Rd, 7674 Arlington Webb Rd]

CASE.

SO THE NEXT CASE, ITEM FOUR, WHICH I BELIEVE IS, UM, THE CASE THAT MANY OF THE CITIZENS ARE HERE ABOUT.

UH, IT IS FURTHER SOUTH AT ENGLAND PARKWAY AND LAKE RIDGE.

UH, THIS WAS AS MENTIONED, UH, PREVIOUSLY.

HERE IT IS ON THE MAP.

? YES.

GUYS TAKING YOUR JOB.

YES.

, AS MANY MENTIONED, THIS WAS ATTENDED TO BE AT ONE POINT, UH, A COMMUNITY CENTER, REC CENTER.

UM, A SURVEY WENT OUT.

UH, I WASN'T NECESSARILY INVOLVED WITH THAT, BUT BASED ON THE INPUT THAT WAS RECEIVED, UH, WE HIRED A THIRD PARTY TO DO THAT SURVEY.

UH, IT WAS KIND OF THROWN UP IN THE AIR, 33% WANTED IT, 33% DIDN'T WANT IT, AND THEN 33% SAID, I DON'T CARE.

SO IT LEFT STAFF AT A, AT LEAST COUNSEL, AT A, A LOSS OF WHAT TO DO TO PROCEED.

UH, I THINK ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WERE HAD BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON, UH, DOWN IN MARY LAGOS.

UM, BUT WITH ALL THAT SAID, PRIOR TO MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS PROPERTY, WE WANTED TO REZONE IT TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THERE CERTAIN USES AREN'T ALLOWED.

AND THEN, UH, KIND OF GUIDE WHOEVER PURCHASES THE PROPERTY, UH, IN THE DIRECTION THAT WE FEEL IS BEST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND BEST FOR THE, THE OVERALL AREA.

UM, WITH THAT, WE DID RECEIVE INPUT.

COUNCILMAN JOHNSON ALSO FORWARDED INPUT, UH, THAT, UH, SOME OF THE CITIZENS WERE, UH, AGAINST THE HYBRID HOUSING COMPONENT OF THE USE THE PROPOSAL, UM, SEEING THAT AS APARTMENTS.

UH, HYBRID HOUSING JUST FOR, UH, EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES IS, UH, BASED ON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE IN GRAND PRAIRIE, UH, TOWN HOME STYLE DEVELOPMENT THAT JUST HAPPENS TO BE FOR RENT.

UM, BUT WITH THAT, WE ARE HAPPY TO REMOVE THAT HYBRID HOUSING COMPONENT.

AND WE'RE GONNA BRING THIS BACK, UH, AT THE SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2025, UH, PNZ MEETING AND THE SEPTEMBER 16TH, 2025 COUNCIL MEETING NOTICES WILL BE FORWARDED AGAIN, SO CITIZENS ARE AWARE.

UM, BUT WE'RE GONNA WITHDRAW THE CASE AS IT STANDS NOW WITH THE HYBRID HOUSING, REMOVE IT AND BRING IT BACK.

THANK YOU.

THAT BEING, THAT BEING SAID, WE DON'T HAVE TO, UH, TABLE IT OFFICIALLY, DO WE? NO, IT'S WITHDRAWN.

OKAY.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING ALL THAT.

YES, MA'AM.

NEXT CASE PLEASE.

DO WE, DO WE HAVE SPEAKER CARDS FOR THAT? WE DO.

I'M SORRY.

SPEAKER CARDS.

UM, THERESA BROWE WISHES TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE? NO.

OKAY.

MM-HMM .

UM, TISHA JORDAN DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WISHES TO REPORT HER OPPOSITION.

JAMES WILL HEIGHT.

UM, SIR, YOU MARKED THAT YOU WANTED TO SPEAK AND NOT SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

SPEAK IS FINE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU FOR COMING, SIR.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

MY NAME IS JAMES WILHITE.

I LIVE AT 31 20 MEIDA.

AND I HAD AM SORT OF IN OPPOSITION.

THE HYBRID HOUSING WAS THE MAIN OPPOSITION POINT, BUT I DO HAVE CONCERNS IF ANYTHING GOES IN THERE.

HAS ANY STUDY BEEN DONE ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE DOWN THERE? WE HAVE CONSTANT INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES, BE IT GAS DURING WINTER, ELECTRICITY, WATER ROAD SURVEYS DONE BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT MORE TRAFFIC NOW.

HAS ANY SURVEY BEEN DONE? IF WE ARE GOING TO DO ANY, ANY BUILDING THERE OR SELL IT FOR ANYBODY TO BUILD, THAT IS ONE OF THE BIG CONCERNS WE HAVE.

AND

[00:25:01]

ALSO IF HYBRID HOUSING OR ANY RESIDENTIAL GETS BUILT ON THERE, HAS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT BEEN BROUGHT IN AND BEEN ASKED IF THEY CAN SUPPORT ADDITIONAL CHILDREN BECAUSE THEY ARE AT CAPACITY? THERE HAVE BEEN TIMES THAT OUR CHILDREN HAVE BEEN TOLD, HEY, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO TAKE A BUS TO FURTHER INTO MANSFIELD MM-HMM .

FOR CLASSES.

AND I THINK ALL OF THIS IS A BIG, BIG ISSUE ALONG WITH POTENTIAL INCREASE IN CRIME BECAUSE THERE IS MORE BEING BUILT DOWN THERE.

AND AFTER SPEAKING WITH A FEW OF THE POLICE OFFICERS, UH, WHEN I WAS AT THE CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY, THEY SAID THERE IS MORE CRIME DOWN THERE.

THEY HAVE CONCERNS WITH THE BARS DOWN THERE.

SPECIFICALLY DRAFTS WAS MENTIONED THAT IF THEY HAD THEIR WAY, THEY'D SHUT IT DOWN FROM THE REPORTS THAT THEY'VE HAD.

UM, YOU MENTIONED, UH, MR. JACKSON, YOU MENTIONED THE SURVEY THAT WAS DONE WITH THE RESULTS THAT WERE GIVEN AFTER THE SURVEY.

THERE WAS ALSO ONE FOR, HEY, IF THE, IF THE COMMUNITY CENTER ISN'T DONE, WHAT DO YOU WANNA SEE THERE AFTER SPEAKING WITH, UH, KURT JOHNSON? GREEN SPACE IN A PARK WAS THE OVERWHELMING RIGHT CHOICE FOR IT.

MM-HMM .

MM-HMM .

WHY ARE WE LOOKING AT REZONING IT AND POSSIBLY SELLING IT INSTEAD OF DOING WHAT THE CITIZENS WANT AND BUILD A PARK OR A GREEN SPACE.

WE MOVED DOWN TO MARGO'S DOWN SOUTH OF THE LAKE FOR GREEN AND QUIET TO GET AWAY FROM THE REST OF THE CITY AND BE IN A QUIETER AREA.

NOW ALL THIS DEVELOPMENT IS BEING BUILT AND IT'S GETTING MORE AND MORE TO WHERE PEOPLE DON'T LIKE IT DOWN THERE.

WE HAVE CONSTANT HOMES GOING UP FOR CELL BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES DOWN SOUTH.

AND I DON'T WANNA BE ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE.

SO, BUT I JUST HAVE MAJOR CONCERNS ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE WITH ANYTHING BEING BUILT DOWN THERE BECAUSE WE, I DON'T LIKE LOSING POWER AND DON'T LIKE HAVING MY HEAT TURNED OFF BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF GAS.

WELL, SIR, YOU, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING AND YOUR CONCERNS ARE VERY VALID AND, BUT AT THIS POINT, THERE'S NOTHING A CITY PROPERTY AND NOTHING'S GONNA BE BUILT ON IT, AND THERE'S NO HYBRID HOUSING.

SO THOSE THINGS ARE OFF THE TABLE.

BUT I DO BELIEVE YOU BRING SOME GOOD POINTS AND I'M PRETTY SURE THAT THE, UH, THIS, UH, PLANNING CAN SPEAK TO, UH, ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE OTHER OTHER CONCERNS YOU HAVE.

DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THAT RASHAD JUST IN GENERAL? I MEAN, RIGHT NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT JUST THE REZONING.

UM, BUT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT INVOLVES OUR ENGINEERING STAFF, OUR TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

SO ANYTHING THAT IS DEVELOPED, EVEN WHEN IT TRANSFERS TO ANOTHER DEVELOPER, HAS TO, UH, MEET OUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED.

ACCESS INGRESS, UH, INGRESS, EGRESS INGRESS AND EGRESS.

YES.

THANK YOU.

WILL BE CONSIDERED.

UM, SO ALL OF THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT.

AND IF IT DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD, ALL THAT STUFF WILL HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY PNC AND COUNCIL IF THERE'S ANY VARIANCES OR VARIATIONS.

WHAT ABOUT THE UTILITY COMPANIES? THAT IS A STRONG ISSUE THAT COUNCIL IS ALSO AWARE OF? UM, I CAN'T REALLY SPEAK TO THAT.

UH, I WOULD SAY REACH OUT TO COUNCILMAN JOHNSON OR OTHERS AT COUNCIL TO SEE WHAT COULD BE DONE.

BUT I KNOW ATMOSPHERES AND OTHERS HAVE SAID THEY'RE PUTTING IN NEW INFRASTRUCTURE, UM, .

UH, SO, UH, AND THEY'VE BEEN ASKED TO ACTUALLY COME TO COUNCIL AND LAY OUT THEIR PLAN.

I BELIEVE THAT'S BEEN DONE PREVIOUSLY, EARLY THIS YEAR OR LATE LAST YEAR.

UM, BUT AGAIN, I'M, I'M, THAT, THAT IS OUT MY WHEELHOUSE.

EITHER TALK TO COUNCILMAN JOHNSON OR REACH OUT TO OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THEY CAN TELL YOU THE GAME PLAN FOR, UH, THAT TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DOWN THERE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

APPRECIATE, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING AND PLEASE STAY IN TOUCH, PLEASE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

ANY OTHER SPEAKER CARDS? YES, SARAH WILL, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WANTS TO RECORD HER OPPOSITION.

UM, THERESA AGUILAR, DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK MA'AM? I DO.

OKAY.

, UH, DOESN'T WISH TO SPEAK, BUT WANTED TO NOTE HER OPPOSITION.

MM-HMM .

AND THAT IS ALL THE CARDS WE HAVE.

MM-HMM .

THANK YOU.

UM, I THINK THERE'S A ANOTHER GENTLEMAN.

SIR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO, MA'AM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? DID YOU TURN IN YOUR CARD? YOU LET THE LADY GO FIRST? I FILLED OUT CARD.

OKAY.

MY NAME IS DEBORAH LAWRENCE.

WAIT, WAIT, JUST WAIT TILL YOU GET TO THE MICROPHONE.

YES.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

MY NAME IS DEBORAH LAWRENCE AND I LIVE AT 2 9 3 2 AR BUSTO.

AND I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR CLARITY IF I UNDERSTAND.

YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE UM, VOTE IS GONNA BE PUT OFF UNTIL SEPTEMBER, RIGHT? WHY IS THAT? YES.

WHY ARE WE GONNA LOOK AT IT AGAIN IN SEPTEMBER? BECAUSE, UH, THE PROPERTY'S STILL UP TO BE REZONED PER OUR DIRECTION THAT'S GIVEN TO STAFF.

WHAT? BASED ON THE INPUT THAT WE RECEIVE FROM CITIZENS AND AFFORDED BY COUNCILMAN JOHNSON.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT HYBRID HOUSING IS NOT SOMETHING THAT Y'ALL WANT DOWN THERE, RIGHT? SO

[00:30:01]

THAT'S WHERE WE'RE REMOVING IT.

WE HAVE TO RE-NOTICE BASED ON STATE LAW, UH, IF WE'RE REMOVING THAT, WE HAVE TO RE-NOTICE AND REDO THE APPLICATION AND THEN GIVE Y'ALL THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT AT THOSE, UH, UH, SPEAK AT THOSE PUBLIC MEETINGS.

AND THE ONLY EDIT WILL BE THAT THE HYBRID BILL TO RENT WILL BE REMOVED? YES.

OKAY.

YES, MA'AM.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR COMING, MA'AM.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, MA'AM.

DID YOU WANT TO NOTE OPPOSITION OR NOT REQUIRED? NO.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING.

ANY OTHER, UM, WE HAVE, YEAH, ONE MORE.

OKAY.

DID YOU TURN IN YOUR, UH, CARD, SIR? OKAY.

YOU TURN IT IN OVER THERE.

HOPEFULLY I FILLED IT OUT CORRECTLY.

YES.

UH, AND IT'S MORE SO JUST TO SPEAK, UM, BECAUSE IF I'M HEARING THIS CORRECTLY, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT TILL YOU GET TO THE MICROPHONE, SIR.

OKAY.

I'LL JUST WRITE THAT YOU'VE SPOKE.

YES.

OKAY, THEN THAT WORKS.

WHAT I NEED, JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, THEN YOU CAN SPEAK.

OKAY.

MY NAME IS ROBERT BARKERS.

6 9 1 5 BRIDGE MARKER.

DRIVE.

FIRST I WANT TO APOLOGIZE.

I DIDN'T PLAN ON SPEAKING AND IF THIS DIDN'T GO OUT ON NEXT DOOR.

SO I THINK WHOEVER PUT THIS ON NEXT DOOR, UH, I SURE WOULDN'T HAVE SHOWED UP.

THIS WAS LIKE THE LAST, LIKE FIVE MINUTES BEFORE I HAD TO GET OUT THE HOUSE AND I WAS LIKE, I ASKED MY WIFE, WIFE SAID, OKAY.

SO I GOT THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO.

I DO APOLOGIZE FOR NOT COMING IN MY SUNDAY'S.

BEST TO SPEAK.

WITH THAT BEING SAID, UH, I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT IT'S MOVING, BUT THE SAD PART IS, IS THAT SINCE IT CAME UP TODAY, I, I WON'T BE ABLE TO MAKE IT ON THE NINTH.

SO I WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND, AND SPEAK ON THE SOUTH SIDE, UH, REAL QUICK.

AND I, AND I JUST ASKED, YOU KNOW, THAT IT, THE, UH, KNOWING THAT AREA, THE, YOU KNOW, THE MIXED HOME, I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT HE'S TAKING THAT AWAY.

BUT I DO SAY IN THE FUTURE I ASK THAT A VISION PLAN BE DONE FOR THE SOUTH SIDE BECAUSE I THINK THE SOUTH SIDE GOT LUMPED INTO NORTH OF JOE POOL LAKE AS WELL.

AND IT SHOWS THAT THE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS, IS, YOU KNOW, AND ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS.

I THINK ANOTHER CASE NEEDS TO BE DONE BECAUSE I SEE MORE HOUSING GETTING PUT UP AND LIKE THE GENTLEMAN SAID EARLIER, THE SCHOOLS ARE PACKED, BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT THE LAKE RIDGE IS A PART OF CEDAR HILL AND NOT A PART OF MANSFIELD.

THE THING THAT CONCERNS ME THOUGH IS WHAT GETS PUT DOWN THERE IN THAT ZONING.

SO NOT ONLY LAKE RIDGE ONE, UH, BEING, UH, RECLASSIFIED ON THE STRINGENT NATURE OF WHAT GOES THERE.

I ASK THAT THE CONSIDERATION BE DONE FOR LAKERIDGE TWO IF IT'S NOT A COMMUNITY CENTER OR GREEN SPACE AS SPOKE ON.

AND THE REASON WHY I SAY THAT IS BECAUSE JUST ACROSS THE STREET FROM WHERE DRAFTS IS IS WHERE THE GENTLEMAN WAS TALKING ABOUT.

WE HAVE ANOTHER BAR GOING ACROSS THE STREET AND ACROSS FROM, OR JUST ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT, THERE'S A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH A LIQUOR STORE.

AND GUESS WHAT'S ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT? ANOTHER CONVENIENCE STORE IS GOING UP ON THE CORNER, WHICH IS RIGHT BESIDE A HOLLOW MARKET, WHICH IS, I DON'T MIND THE HOLLOW MARKET THIS, YOU KNOW, HEY, IT'S OKAY.

BUT WHAT I DO MIND IS THAT WE GET TOO MUCH OF THE SAME THING IN ONE CONCENTRATED AREA AND WHEN WE MOVE DOWN THERE, YOU MOVE DOWN THERE FOR SOMETHING NICE.

MOST OF THE HOMES THAT ARE GOING FOR SALE RIGHT NOW BY TEXAS FIRST OR TEXAS HOME OR WHATEVER THE NAME OF THE BUILDER IS, IS GOING FOR A MILLION DOLLARS.

YET, WHEN YOU START LOOKING AT WHAT THEY'RE PUTTING DOWN IN THE SUPPORT OF US DOWN THERE, WE'RE GETTING GAS STATIONS AND LIQUOR STORES OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

AND THEN WE GET APARTMENTS RIGHT DOWN THE STREET AND RIGHT THERE BY PRIMROSE, IF YOU GO A LITTLE BIT FURTHER NORTH, THERE'S MORE HOUSING THAT GOES IN, WHICH THEN GOES TO MY GENTLEMAN'S, YOU KNOW, CASE OF WE'RE GETTING CROWDED DOWN THERE ON ZERO POOL ON THE PENINSULA, WHICH THEN GOES INTO SAID, 'CAUSE I KNOW IN THE FUTURE WE DID TALK ABOUT, I WANT TO SAY TWO YEARS WHEN I MOVED HERE, I WANNA SAY 2019, THEY DID A VISION PLAN AND THEY SAID, HEY, WHAT DOES EVERYBODY WANT? AND THEN THEY DIDN'T TALK TO US ANYMORE.

AND THAT WAS FOR THAT GREAT SPACE THAT GOES RIGHT THERE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT JOE POOL LAKE AREA THAT THE ARMY WON'T LET GO OF THAT SAYS THAT YOU CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING THERE.

THANK GOODNESS THAT THEY HAVEN'T ALLOWED ANYTHING TO GO THERE.

BUT I JUST ASK THAT IN THE ZONING OF ALL OF THIS, PLEASE HAVE CONSIDERATION OF, IT'LL BE NICE JUST TO HAVE PLACES WHERE WE DON'T HAVE TO STUFF IN MORE HOUSING JUST TO GET MORE DOLLARS FOR PROPERTY TAX REVENUE THAT WE REALLY START CONSIDERING THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE DOWN THERE WHO WOULD JUST LIKE A PARK, SOMETHING GREEN SPACE, SOMETHING TO BE ABLE TO GET OUT THE HOUSE.

IT WOULD JUST BE NICE TO HAVE THAT CONSIDERATION.

AND I KNOW I'M SHORT ON TIME AND I DIDN'T PLAN ON REALLY SPEAKING JUST BECAUSE I KNOW FORD GOT MOVED TO SEPTEMBER 9TH, SO I DO APOLOGIZE MM-HMM .

BUT I DO ASK ON EVERYBODY ON THE SOUTH SIDE, THAT CONSIDERATION BE DONE BY THE ZONING TO PLEASE LIMIT.

WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER DUNKING DONUTS OR A STRIP MALL.

WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER GAS STATION OR CONVENIENCE STORE.

IT'S JUST GETTING TO A POINT DOWN THERE WHERE, I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY NAIL SALONS YOU REALLY NEED TO DO YOUR NAILS.

THEY ARE ON ALL UP AND DOWN, BROAD AND ALL UP AND DOWN LAKE RIDGE AND MM-HMM .

TRUST ME, WE, YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND EVERYBODY NEEDS A JOB.

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT.

MM-HMM .

BUT I DO WANT THIS CONSIDERATION ON THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON THAT PENINSULA THAT WELL, SIR, WOULD BE NICE.

SIR, YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELL TAKEN AND WE HEAR YOU NOW.

WE'RE GONNA LET OUR DIRECTOR SPEAK TO THAT.

WE WILL LET HIM GIVE IT AN OVERVIEW OF THAT.

YOU CAN, YES.

JUST, JUST TO NOTE, AL, KEEP IN MIND MUCH OF THE THINGS THAT YOU HAVE NOTED WITH REGARD TO THE ZONING THAT'S NOT CITY OWNED PROPERTY.

SO THE ZONING'S IN PLACE AND THOSE DEVELOPERS

[00:35:01]

ARE BUILDING AND BRINGING IN USAGE THAT THEY'RE ALLOWED TO BRING IN.

NOW THAT'S NOT WITHOUT INPUT FROM CITY STAFF COUNCIL.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE ZIP CODE DOWN THERE IS ONE OF THE MOST AFFLUENT IN THE STATE AND THE HOMES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE THAT ARE GOING IN ARE HIGH END.

UH, WE'VE TRIED TO GET SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS, WE'VE TRIED TO INITIATE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT PORTION THAT THE COURTS HAS UNDER CONTROL CULTURAL ENGINEERS.

UM, THINGS JUST ARE STAGNANT BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC.

THERE'S NOT ENOUGH TRAFFIC BASED ON THE MARKET FROM WHAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD.

NOW I'M GETTING INTO SOME OF THE WEEDS, BUT YOU MENTIONED THE LONG RANGE PLAN THAT WAS DONE IN 2019.

MM-HMM .

WE'RE GETTING READY TO INITIATE A NEW ONE.

SO IT'S PERFECT TIMING AND WE'VE STARTED THAT.

NOW THIS, AGAIN, IT'S A COMP PLAN UPDATE.

WE CALL IT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, AND IT'S THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP THAT GETS REVISED.

DEVELOPMENT INTENT IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, NOT ZONING.

WE CAN STILL USE THAT AS A GUIDE TO SAY, DEVELOPER PROPERTY OWNER, THIS IS WHAT THE CITIZENS WANT.

AND IF YOU COULD, CAN YOU DEVELOP ACCORDING TO THIS? OR AT LEAST IT SWAYS WHAT THEY PROPOSED TO DEVELOP.

BUT THE ZONING IS STILL THE ZONING.

SOME OF THESE ZONINGS HAVE BEEN DONE AND THEY WERE DONE BACK IN THE SEVENTIES, EIGHTIES, AND NINETIES, AND THEY'RE JUST NOT COMING THROUGH.

SO MUCH OF WHAT Y'ALL ARE SEEING HAS BEEN OUT OF THE CITY'S CONTROL, BUT BASED ON OUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, IT'S BEEN HIGH END BECAUSE OF WHAT WE PUT IN PLACE FROM THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.

BUT I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU THAT LITTLE TIDBIT.

NOW, I WILL SAY YOU MENTIONED SEPTEMBER 9TH, PNZ, IT WILL BE BACK SEPTEMBER 9TH, BUT YOU STILL HAVE A CHANCE, UH, IF THAT'S APPROVED BY PNZ.

UM, THE FINAL SAY WILL BE SEPTEMBER 16TH AT CITY COUNCIL.

SO YOU CAN, IF YOU CAN ATTEND THAT MEETING AND YOU WANNA PROVIDE SOME INPUT, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO.

OKAY.

AND JUST ON THAT, UH, I'M, I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT UP THE PLAN FROM 2019 MM-HMM .

BUT IT SEEMS LIKE IF THE PLA PLAN DIDN'T, WASN'T LISTENED TO AND THE PLAN THAT 2019 WASN'T LISTENED TO, THAT IF WE DO IT AGAIN AND IT DOESN'T GET LISTENED TO, THEN THE DEVELOPERS WOULD DO WHAT THEY WANT.

AND YES, THEY CAN BUILD NICE FACADES, BUT A VAPE SHOP, A NAIL SALON THAT GOES IN IT, THE THINGS THAT GO IN IT, I AGREE.

IT WOULD BE, AND I, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU, UH, AND I, AND I DO, AND AGAIN, I'M NOT GONNA TAKE ANY MORE TIME.

NO, I JUST, IT'S FINE.

UH, AND, AND AGAIN, THANK Y'ALL FOR JUST HEARING MY HEART ON THIS, IS THAT IT WOULD JUST BE NICE ON THE SOUTH SIDE THAT ALLOW THEM TO DO ANOTHER STUDY ON THAT AREA.

LIKE YOU SAID, IT'S THE MOST AFFLUENT IN ALL OF TEXAS, BUT YET WE LOOK LIKE WE ARE NOT TREATED LIKE THAT AS SUCH.

THERE IS GONNA BE AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT OF THIS COMP PLAN UPDATE SO THAT MARKET WILL BE UPDATED, THAT MARKET INFORMATION WILL BE UPDATED AND USED IN ORDER TO GARNER MORE INTEREST TO THE AREA.

THAT WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE.

I DO.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

NO PROBLEM.

PROBLEM.

THANK YOU, SIR.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU.

ANY MORE SPEAKER CARDS? THAT'S, I DON'T BELIEVE SO, MA'AM.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THAT BEING SAID, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION BEFORE WE, UH, COMMISSIONER LUCKY THIS IS, UM, DISTRICT, THIS IS WITHDRAWN TO NO, WELL, THAT'S RIGHT.

THAT'S RIGHT.

I'M, SO, I'M I'LL NOT HERE TODAY, I APOLOGIZE.

THAT'S OKAY.

OKAY.

SO, UH, NEXT CASE PLEASE.

[Items 5 & 6]

SORRY, NEXT CASE IS NOT AS EXCITING.

.

SO ITEM NUMBER FIVE AND ITEM NUMBER SIX ARE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FROM COMMERCIAL TO SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED LOCATED AT ONE 18 NORTHEAST 11TH STREET.

SO ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 25 0 7 0 0 1 5.

SO EXISTING PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY OWNER ALREADY HAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME, HOME ON THE SOUTHERN PART.

HE WISHES TO CONSTRUCT A DUPLEX TO THE NORTHERN PORTION.

HOWEVER, THE CURRENT ZONING DOES NOT ALLOW THAT.

SO WITH THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST, WE HAVE TO ALSO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS THE CURRENT FUTURE AND LAND USE MAP AGAINST THIS AREA AS COMMERCIAL RETAIL OFFICE.

PART OF THE REASON MIGHT BE THAT IT'S PROXIMITY TO MAIN STREET, BUT YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S ALREADY A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL, UM, FUTURE LAND USE TO THE NORTH AND, UH, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES AS NOTED DURING THE BRIEFING.

SO STEP IS ENABLED TO SUPPORT AN AMENDMENT BECAUSE THE PURPOSE USE DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS.

ONE, THE SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY USED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE THAT IS NOW DEMOLISHED.

THE PROPOSED USE IS GENERALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING LANE USE TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE NORTH.

AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE A REPL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

THE

[00:40:01]

COMPANION ITEM IS A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST ITEM NUMBER SIX CON 25 0 7 0 0 2 4.

SO AGAIN, THE EXISTING ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL ZONING.

THE APPLICANT RESISTS TO REQUEST A ZONE CHANGE TO THE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, WHICH WILL ALLOW A CONSTRUCTION ABLE DUPLEX.

UM, AS NOTED DURING THE UH, PREVIOUS CASE, THERE ARE ALREADY A LOT OF EXISTING, UH, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AROUND IT.

STAFF FEELS THAT THIS DUPLEX WILL BE COMPATIBLE TO THE EXISTING FABRIC OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AGAIN, THE ZONING RULE NEED TO BE CHANGED TO SINGLE FAMILY.

AND HERE'S A PROPOSED DUPLEX FLOOR PLAN AND THE, UM, ELEVATION.

THEY'RE PROPOSING A SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX TO FIT IN.

UM, I THINK MOST OF THE EXISTING HOMES ARE ABOUT SINGLE, UH, ONE STORY IN THAT AREA.

SO AGAIN, THE STAFFER RECOMMENDATION, WE HAVE TO NOTE THE SAME INFORMATION THAT THE, UH, FUTURE LAND MAP DOES NOT ALIGN WITH IT.

HOWEVER, IF THE CPA IS APPROVED THAT THE SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY USED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND IT IS COMPATIBLE, UM, AND THEN WILL REPL, THE STAFF DOES NOT, UM, HAVE SIGNIFICANT CONCERN TO IT.

WE ONLY JUST WOULD LIKE TO ADD A CONDITION IF THE PNZ RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL, UH, PLEASE ADD A CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL WILL APPLY THE PROPERTY AND FILE WITH THE COUNTY BEFORE ISSUANCE.

SO IF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, UM, AS I HAVE NOTED, THIS PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY ONE LOT RIGHT NOW.

UM, TO KEEP THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME, THERE'S JUST GONNA HAVE TO DRAW A LOT LINE, JUST SPLITTING IT SO THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME CAN REMAIN ON THEIR OWN ONE LOT.

AND ON THE NEWLY CREATED LOT, THEY CAN GO INTO DUPLEX CONSTRUCTION WITH JUST THE BUILDING PERMIT.

THAT WOULD BE THE MOST APPROPRIATE WAY.

THAT WAY WE DON'T END UP WITH, UH, THREE DWELLING UNITS ON ONE LOT.

THAT IS OUR RECOMMENDATION IS, IS THERE ANY QUESTION FOR STAFF? THE APPLICANT WISHED TO BE HERE, BUT HE WAS TRAVELING AND HE SAID HE WILL TRY TO, UH, HE WILL BE AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

GREAT.

PRESENTATION SPEAKER CARDS.

WE DO NOT HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM.

NO SPEAKER CARDS.

UM, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? UH, COMMISSIONERS, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? JANIE, THIS IS, UH, YOUR AREA COMMISSIONER, UM, ARI.

ARI, UH, DO YOU WANNA DISCUSS IT A LITTLE BIT BEFORE YOU MAKE YOUR MOTION? DO YOU HAVE ANY CONCERNS? WELL, I MEAN, IT'S JUST A, A LOT OF THE, THE STUFF AROUND IT WAS INDUSTRIAL.

I DIDN'T COGNIZE THE AREA, BUT, UM, I KNOW IT'S OFF OF MAIN.

WHAT ARE YOU THINK? ARE YOU THINKING, ARE YOU THINKING THERE'S SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD, UH, DENY? I MEAN, IT'S, IT'S YOUR CALL.

THE MOTION YOU MAKE IS THE MOTION YOU MAKE BASED ON, ON YOUR CONCERNS.

AND THEN EACH COMMISSIONER HAS A, A DUTY TO DECIDE IF THEY WANT AGREE WITH IT OR NOT.

SO IT'S, IT'S NOT YOUR SOLE DECISION, BUT YOU, YOU MAKE THE MOTION AS TO WHAT YOU, SINCE THAT YOU LIVE IN THAT DISTRICT, WHAT, WHAT YOUR FEELINGS ARE.

AND IF WE NEED TO DISCUSS IT, WE CAN DISCUSS IT.

YOU'D LIKE TO, UM, I GUESS 'CAUSE BEHIND IT, IT'S NOT HOUSES.

THOSE ARE ALL BUSINESSES ON RICE.

MM-HMM .

OH, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT TO THE SOUTH AND THE YEAH, SO TO THE SOUTH IS MULTIFAMILY, I BELIEVE.

OH, OKAY.

OH, OKAY.

I THINK SO.

HOTEL, SO IT'S NOT THAT FAR OFF.

OH, RICE STREET.

OH, SO THE, ALONG THE RIGHT STREET, THOSE ARE DUPLEXES OR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

OH, OKAY.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

I WAS THINKING, I THINK EVEN THOUGH, EVEN THOUGH THAT, UH, FLUME IS NOT, DOESN'T MATCH FLUME, BUT THERE ARE OTHER COMPATIBLE HOUSING THERE, RIGHT.

THAT IT WOULD FIT AS I THINK IS WHAT SHE'S TRYING TO SAY.

OH, OKAY.

YEAH.

THAT'S WHAT, YEAH.

CAN YOU JUST RESTATE THAT, JIM? OF COURSE.

YES, I'D BE HAPPY TO.

SORRY.

SO LET ME, SO CURRENTLY THESE, UM, TO THE NORTH ALONG RIGHT STREET, THEY ARE ACTUALLY ZONED, UM, WHAT WE CALL TWO FAMILY ZONING, WHICH ALLOWS DUPLEXES.

SO THE, UH, ALONG THIS RICE ROAD, THERE ARE MOSTLY EITHER DUPLEXES OR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES.

UM, I BELIEVE I NOTED THIS ACTUALLY TO THE SOUTH IS A MOTEL AND ALSO THIS IS A HOTEL.

BUT AGAIN, I THINK WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS, HEY, IT'S LIKELY THAT, UM, HAVING A SINGLE FAMILY HOME BETWEEN A DUPLEX AND THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME IS PROBABLY PROBABLE THAN TRYING TO FIT IN A NON-RESIDENTIAL USE BETWEEN AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

I THINK THAT'S WHY STEPH DID NOT HAVE CONCERNS FOR HIS REQUEST FOR DUPLEX.

MM-HMM .

AND ACROSS THE STREET IS ALSO A SINGLE FAMILY ALONG NORTHEAST 11TH STREET.

THANK YOU, JUNE.

OF COURSE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR JUNE SINCE THE APPLICANT IS NOT HERE? NO OTHER QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

DID Y'ALL HAVE ANY DISCUSSION, , AND DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY CONCERNS THEY'D LIKE TO STATE TO COMMISSIONER ARI BEFORE SHE MAKES HER MOTION? YOUR OPINION? , I'M KIND OF MIXED ON

[00:45:01]

THIS.

I KIND OF AM OKAY WITH, UM, THE DUPLEX BEING THERE, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, UM, UH, I ALWAYS LIKE TO TRY TO, WHEN I CAN ADHERE TO FLU, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, THE CITY WANTS TO GO IN A CERTAIN DIRECTION, YOU KNOW, BUT IT, IT'S, IT'S OKAY THOUGH.

IT'S OKAY.

I'M OKAY WITH IT.

YEAH, SAME HERE.

GO AHEAD AND SPEAK.

YEAH, SAME HERE.

SINCE IT'S GOT THE HOUSING TO THE NORTH AND TO THE, UH, WEST OF IT, I ALSO FEEL LIKE IT'S, UM, WOULD ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS LIKE TO SPEAK ON IT? ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON IT? I THINK THAT, UH, THERE'S NO OPPOSITION APPARENTLY.

OKAY.

NO, NO.

THIS IS WHAT, NO, THIS IS ANGELA THAT YOU WANTED TO SPEAK ON IT, MADAM CHAIR.

I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T HAVE A COMMENT TO SPEAK ON THAT ONE, BUT, UM, I DID HAVE A ROB RU OR WHEN WE WAS ON DISTRICT SIX, I WAS HOPING THAT STAFF COULD GET THE TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF THE INDIVIDUALS THAT CAME OUT TO SPEAK TO LOUD COUNCILMAN JOHNSON TO BE ABLE TO CONTACT THEM.

WE, WE CAN DEAL WITH THAT.

UH, GO AHEAD.

UH, RASHAD, UH, WE'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO GET THAT INFORMATION.

IT'S NOT, THEY'RE ONLY REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THAT'S REQUIRED TO SPEAK.

SO THEIR PHONE NUMBERS, I MEAN, WE CAN FORWARD THE ADDRESSES, BUT NOT THEIR PHONE NUMBERS.

MM-HMM .

YEAH, THAT'S, THAT'S, UH, THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL HAVE TO DEAL WITH OUTSIDE OF THE MEETING, BUT THANK YOU FOR THAT, FOR THAT, UH, CONCERN.

THAT'S A VALID CONCERN.

UM, SO WE'RE STILL ON, WE'RE, UM, YEAH, MADAM CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, DO WE NEED TO DO FIVE AND SIX TOGETHER? YEAH.

YES.

OKAY.

CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM FIVE AND SIX AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST PER STAFF'S REC, UH, CONDITION FOR CPA TO 5 0 7 0 0 1 5.

AND ITEM NUMBER SIX ZERO N 2 5 0 7 0 0 2 4.

I SECOND THAT.

YEAH, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE ITEMS FIVE AND SIX AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER FRANK GONZALEZ.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE PLEASE.

[Items 7 & 8]

YES.

THE NEXT ITEM IS A, ANOTHER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST.

IT HAS ITEM NUMBER SEVEN AND ITEM NUMBER EIGHT TOGETHER.

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS CPA 25 0 7 0 0 1 4.

SO APPLICANT WISHES TO CH REQUEST, UM, ZONE CHANGE FROM A SINGLE FAMILY ONE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

IN ORDER TO DO SO, WE HAVE TO AMEND THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO THE CURRENT ONE SHOWS THIS AREA BEING DESIGNATED FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL IN AN OFFICE AND THE APPLICANT RESIST CHANGE THAT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW THE ZONE CHANGE.

SO AGAIN, STEP IS NOTABLE TO SUPPORT, UH, BECAUSE OF THE PROPOSED, UM, USE NOT ALIGN WITH THE FUTURE LEAN USE MAP.

HOWEVER, THIS ACTUALLY BATCHES THE PREDOMINANT USE OF THE AREA.

IT'S THE AREA ALONG HARD ROCK HAS ALREADY BEEN USED BY OTHER INDUSTRIAL USERS AND WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF, UH, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN WAREHOUSES COMING IN THAT AREA.

THE ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS A JOINT ITEM Z, UM, ZON 25 0 7 0 0 2 5, WHICH IS A ZONE CHANGE.

AGAIN, THE APPLICANT WISHES TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF THIS PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY ONE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

AND, UM, IF THE ZONING IS APPROVED, THEY WILL COME BACK WITH A SITE PLAN SHOWING A, UH, INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES FOR A CONTRACTOR SHOP.

AGAIN, AS I HAVE NOTED, THE AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES RIGHT NOW.

THEY JUST WOULD LIKE TO TEAR DOWN SOME OF THE OLDER, UM, STRUCTURES THERE AND BUILD A BRAND NEW INDUSTRIAL FACILITY.

THE, UM, IF THE ZONING IS APPROVED, THEY'LL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATION DURING THE SITE PLAN.

AND STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT, UM, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WE'RE NOT ABLE TO SUPPORT DUE TO THE OB ALIGNMENT WITH THE UMAB.

HOWEVER THE CPA IS APPROVED AND THE ZONE CHANGES IS APPROVED.

UH, WE JUST WANNA KNOW THAT WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IS ACTUALLY THE PREDOMINANT USE OF THE AREA AND, UM, WOULD MATCH, TRULY BLEND IN BETTER WITH THE, UM, EXISTING USES.

UH, THIS IS CONCLUDES THAT PRESENTATION.

I DON'T BELIEVE OUR APPLICANT IS HERE, BUT IS THERE ANY, UH, QUESTION FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? OH, DID WE? OKAY.

SORRY.

YES.

SORRY.

THE ENGINEER IS HERE.

MM-HMM .

DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JUNE? COMMISSIONER FOR DARCO? SO JUNE, UM MM-HMM .

I RECOGNIZE THAT THESE PEOPLE, THEY HAD A RESIDENCE OUT THERE BEFORE AND THEN KIND OF 1 61 CAME INTO THEIR BACKYARD MM-HMM .

WHICH DOESN'T MAKE IT A, A GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD MM-HMM

[00:50:01]

.

HOWEVER, IN THAT, IF YOU COULD JUST KEEP THAT AERIAL VIEW UP MM-HMM .

IN THAT LITTLE, UM, NOTCH THAT YOU HAVE MM-HMM .

IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S ANOTHER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE THERE, CORRECT? RIGHT.

SO, MM-HMM .

GO AHEAD.

MM-HMM .

SO, UH, IT'S NOT THE SAME OWNER IF THEY PUT UP THIS CONTRACTOR SHOP MM-HMM .

WHAT KIND OF PROTECTIONS, IF ANY, ARE GONNA BE AFFORDED SURE.

THAT HOUSE? RIGHT.

SO DURING THE SITE PLAN, WE'LL PROBABLY CONSIDER REQUIRING WHAT'S THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT? IS THE SIX FOOT ALLY SCREENING WALL ABUTTING ANY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES? I JUST WANNA NOTE TO YOU THAT SOME OF THESE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, UM, HAVE KIND OF, WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE PROPER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, SOMETIMES CONVERT THE USES FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.

SO I'M NOT SAYING THAT BUILDING IS BEING USED AS NON-RESIDENTIAL RIGHT NOW, BUT IF WE CAN IDENTIFY THAT THERE ARE TRULY A RESIDENTIAL HOME, THEY WE'LL HAVE TO BUILD A SIX POST, UH, MAIN CITY SCREENING WALL ALONG ANY, UH, RESIDENTIAL ZONING ZONED PROPERTY.

AND THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF THAT.

WE DISCUSSED THAT PRIOR TO GOING THROUGH THE, UM, ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION.

SO, SO, UM MM-HMM .

I'M ASSUMING MM-HMM .

THAT HOUSE THAT ADJOINS THIS, THEY WERE GIVEN NOTICE OF THIS? YES.

YES.

MM-HMM .

YES.

EVERYONE AROUND 300 FEET? YES.

MM-HMM .

DID YOU GET ANY, UH, LETTERS? I DON'T REMEMBER ALL THAT.

NOT THAT, NOT UP TO THIS POINT, BUT AGAIN, WE'LL TRY TO KEEP TRACK OF IT UNTIL THE CITY COUNCIL DATE TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY THAT COMES IN AFTER THIS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR JIM? THANK YOU, JIM.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER CARDS? YES.

WE HAVE ONE CARD FROM JIM DEWEY WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

WELCOME.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

GOOD EVENING.

CHAIRWOMAN SMITH, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

I'M JIM DEWEY WITH JDJR ENGINEERS, 2,500 TEXAS DRIVE, SUITE 100, IRVING, TEXAS.

UM, THE GENTLEMAN THAT HAS THIS PROPERTY UNDER CONTRACT OWNS A VERY SUCCESSFUL MECHANICAL SER BUSINESS.

HE CURRENTLY IS AN IRVING, IT'S CALLED SERVICE ONE MECHANICAL.

UH, HE DOES AIR CONDITIONING AND COOLING SYSTEMS, PREDOMINANTLY COMMERCIAL.

HE HAS LARGE NATIONAL CLIENTS LIKE QUICKTRIP AND DIFFERENT THINGS.

DOES A GREAT JOB.

I PERSONALLY HAVE KNOWN HIM FOR MANY YEARS.

HE WANTS TO RELOCATE TO THIS LOCATION EVEN THOUGH HIS SITE AND IRVING HAS ROOM TO EXPAND, BUT HE FEELS LIKE THIS IS A MUCH BETTER LOCATION FOR TRANSPORTATION AND MANY OTHER REASONS.

UH, WE DO REALIZE THAT WE HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY WE WILL BE PUTTING IN.

SHOULD THIS GET APPROVED, WE WILL BE PUTTING IN ALL THE REQUIRED MASONRY SCREENING WALLS.

UM, NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT HIS USE.

HE WANTS TO BUILD A 3000 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING OFFICE BUILDING FOR HIS OFFICE EMPLOYEES, AND THEN A SEPARATE BUILDING THAT'S 10,000 SQUARE FEET.

SO THIS IS NOT LIGHT.

IF YOU LOOK AT AN AERIAL PHOTO OR SOMETHING, THERE'S THESE GIANT WAREHOUSES EVERYWHERE.

I DON'T CONSIDER IT WAREHOUSING.

MAYBE YOU DISAGREE WITH ME.

TO ME, WAREHOUSING, THEY BRING STUFF IN AND BULK AND THEN THEY SHIP IT, YOU KNOW, DROP SHIPPING AND AMAZON AND THAT TYPE OF THING.

AND THEY, HE WILL ONLY STORE PRODUCTS HE USES IN HIS BUSINESS IN THAT BUILDING.

THE AIR CONDITIONING UNITS, DUCT WORK, STUFF LIKE THAT.

HE DOESN'T SELL ANY PRODUCTS.

THERE'LL BE NO RETAIL SALES.

IT'S JUST THEY BRING IN THE PRODUCT, THEY LEAVE ON THEIR TRUCKS AND GO DO THEIR JOB.

AND THAT'S ALL THAT'S GONNA BE IN THAT BUILDING.

SO I DON'T REALLY CONSIDER IT A WAREHOUSE MORE AS STORAGE, BUT, UM, YOU'LL MAKE A GREAT CORPORATE CITIZEN AND I WOULD LIKE TO HAND OUT SOMETHING REAL QUICK.

I DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO GIVE IT TO THE CITY.

WHAT I'M SHOWING YOU THERE IS SIMPLY YOUR OWN ZONING MAP.

I DON'T KNOW IF ONE WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET, BUT FOR WHATEVER REASON, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS JUST NOT TAKEN OFF IN THIS LOCATION, EVEN THOUGH IT'S ON YOUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

IF YOU LOOK AT THESE MAPS, PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS IN THE CENTER OF THE PAGE IN RED.

THE ALLI ZONING IS IN GRAY.

AND THEN THAT LARGE PD 2 21 THAT'S ACROSS THE HIGHWAY IS ALSOI JUST THROUGH A PD.

SO THIS WOULD BE A VERY COMPATIBLE USE WITH WHAT'S OUT THERE.

IT'S A SMALL BUSINESS, SEXUAL BUSINESS THAT HE WANTS TO MOVE TO GRAND PRAIRIE.

SO WITH THAT, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT THIS REQUEST.

THANK YOU FOR THAT, SIR.

COMMISSIONER CHARE? YES.

UM, SORRY.

OKAY.

UM, THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.

MM-HMM .

UM, DO YOU THINK THERE'S POTENTIAL TO HAVE NEW EMPLOYEES BROUGHT HERE? YES.

TO GRAND PRAIRIE? MM-HMM .

DO YOU KNOW APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY? I DON'T KNOW THAT HE ALREADY EMPLOYEES.

MANY, SEVERAL, MANY EMPLOYEES.

GOTCHA.

HE HAS HAS SEVERAL TRUCKS AND CREWS.

HE'S CURRENTLY USING A 5,000

[00:55:01]

SQUARE FOOT BUILDING AND HE IS JUST BUSTING OUT THE SEAMS. GOTCHA.

AND SO HE, HE WILL BE BRINGING ON NEW CREWS.

THEY NEED MORE CREWS AND HE WILL BE ADDING EMPLOYEES.

AWESOME.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT, THAT BACKGROUND BECAUSE THAT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU KNOW, THAT HE HAS A THRIVING BUSINESS IN IRVING, BUT WANTS TO MOVE TO GRAND PRAIRIE.

MM-HMM .

THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES.

ANOTHER THING THAT SPEAKS TO ME IS THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT GONNA BE, UH, LIKE A REGULAR WAREHOUSE, LIKE YOU SAID, A LOT OF MOVEMENT OF TRUCKS AND, AND UH, UH, DELIVERIES AND ALL OF THAT.

RIGHT.

AND 90% OF THEIR BUSINESS IS DURING WORK HOURS DURING THE DAY, SO MM-HMM .

THEY DON'T DO MUCH WORK IN THE EVENINGS OR LATE AT NIGHT, OF COURSE.

MM-HMM .

AND HOW MANY YEARS HAS THIS PERSON BEEN IN BUSINESS? AT LEAST 20.

MM-HMM .

VERY GOOD.

COMMISSIONERS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR CONCERN? COMMISSIONER FOR DARCO? YEAH, MADAM CHAIR.

THIS IS MY DISTRICT.

I WAS JUST GONNA SAY, I, LIKE I SAID, 1 61 HAS BROUGHT TREMENDOUS CHANGE TO WHAT USED TO BE PASTURE LAND OUT THERE, SO I CAN UNDERSTAND HOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CHANGING, BUT WHEN YOUR CLIENT, OR WHEN THIS COMES BEFORE US, I JUST DO WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THE ADJOINING RESIDENCE IS, 'CAUSE HE'S, HE'S NOT NECESSARILY PART OF YOUR BUSINESS AND HIS RIGHTS AS A RESIDENT NEEDS TO BE PROTECTED THERE.

ABSOLUTELY.

BUT I WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW, EVEN IF THAT'S, THIS IS HIS STATED PLAN RIGHT NOW MM-HMM .

CHANGING THE ZONING, JUST THEY COULD SELL IT TWO YEARS FROM NOW.

I'M NOT SAYING THAT THEY WOULD, BUT IT, WE JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT IT COMES WITH ALL THE RESTRICTIONS THAT IT, IT SHOULD AND YES, WE'LL DO THAT.

WE HAD A LENGTHY PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING WITH THE CITY WHERE WE ARE AWARE OF ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS WHEN THE OVERLAID DISTRICT AS WELL AS THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING STANDARDS, THE SCREENING STANDARDS, ALL THE LANDSCAPING.

WE HAD HAVE NO INTENTION OF TRYING TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE.

WE'RE GONNA BE COMPLYING WITH ALL OF THE CITY REGULATION.

VERY GOOD QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER FOR DARCO.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? COMMISSIONER CHAPMAN? UM, MR. DEWEY, YOU SAID YOUR CLIENT HAS THE PROPERTY UNDER CONTRACT, CORRECT? HE DOESN'T YET OWN IT.

HE DOES NOT OWN IT.

OKAY.

AND IS THIS APPROVAL CONTINGENT UPON HIM ACTUALLY GOING THROUGH WITH THE PURCHASE OR WOULD HE DECIDE YES.

IF HE CAN'T USE IT FOR HIS INTENTION FOR HIS BUSINESS, THEN HE HAS NO INTENTION OF BUYING.

CERTAINLY, SIR.

I UNDERSTAND.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? MS. DE? THANK YOU, SIR.

THANK YOU FOR COMING.

DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKER CARDS? NO, MA'AM.

OKAY.

NO MORE SPEAKER CARDS.

UH, COMMISSIONER ERCO, THIS IS YOUR AREA.

DO WE NEED TO HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS? HOW DO YOU, HOW ARE YOU FEELING ON THIS? ARE YOU, UH, AS I STATED, THIS ALL USED TO BE PASTURE LAND.

I REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS 1, 6, 2, 1 CHANGED ALL OF THAT.

UH, SO THE HIGHWAY REALLY BROUGHT THE CHANGE TO THIS AREA.

I DON'T LIKE TO SEE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES GO AWAY, BUT YOU GOTTA, YOU KNOW, CIRCUMSTANCES HAVE CHANGED OUT THERE.

I JUST, AGAIN, MY ONLY CONCERN IS I'LL PROBABLY A LOT MORE FASTIDIOUS IN LOOKING AT WHEN THE SITE PLAN COMES UP, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ADJOINING LIVING THERE RESIDENT IS PROTECTED FROM WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING.

THANK YOU.

WE RELY ON YOU FOR THAT BECAUSE THIS IS YOUR DISTRICT AND, UM, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT AS, AS WELL.

YOU, LIKE I SAID, BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY PRETTY MUCH THAT.

UM, IS THAT NOT BEING ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? COMMISSIONER WOULD LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION.

YES, MADAM CHAIR.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE, UM, CLOSE THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION AND VOTE TO APPROVE BOTH ITEM SIX AND ITEM SEVEN AS PRESENT.

I GIMME SECOND.

SECOND.

SEVEN.

EIGHT.

SEVEN AND EIGHT.

OH, I'M SORRY.

SEVEN AND EIGHT.

MM-HMM .

CAN I GET A SECOND? OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE ITEM SEVEN AND EIGHT BY COMMISSIONER DUCO AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.

ANGELA LUCK VN.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE.

[9. TAM-25-08-0003 - Text Amendment. An Ordinance of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas, amending portions of Article 1: General Provisions and Procedures, Article 4: Permissible Uses, Article 6: Density and Dimensional Requirements, Article 7: Special Districts, Article 10: Parking and Loading Standards, Article 12: Subdivision and Utilities, Article 13: Building Permits & Construction, Article 16: Site Plan Approval, Article 22: Fee Schedule, Article 23: Master Transportation Plan, Article 26: Mobile/Manufactured/Modular Home and Recreational Vehicle Regulations, Article 30: Definitions, and Appendix W: Residential Development Standards, of the Grand Prairie Unified Development Code (UDC) for the purposes of aligning the UDC with recent changes to state law related to mixed used residential and multifamily development rights; zoning protests and notice requirements; regulation of home-based businesses; small residential lot development rights (“tiny lots”); HUD-Code manufactured housing; approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees; and regulation of the conversion of office buildings or non-residential buildings to mixed-use and multifamily residential uses; Repealing all Ordinances or Parts of Ordinances in Conflict Herewith; Containing a Savings Clause and a Severability Clause; Containing a Penalty Clause, and Establishing an Effective Date]

ALL RIGHT.

THIS NEXT ITEM IS A TEXT AMENDMENT, UH, TO MO MULTIPLE ARTICLES IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCLUDING ARTICLE 1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 16, 22, 23, 26, 30, AS WELL AS APPENDIX W.

UM, THIS REQUEST IS TO ALIGN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH RECENT CHANGES TO STATE LAW.

UH, THAT INCLUDES MIXED USE AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS, ZONING, PROTESTS, AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS, REGULATION OF HOME-BASED BUSINESS, SMALL LOT, SMALL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT, HEAD CODE, UH, MANUFACTURE, UH, RESIDENCES, APPROVAL OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND FACT FEES AND CONVERSION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS TO MIXED USE AND MULTIFAMILY USE.

IN YOUR PACKET, I INCLUDED A TABLE SUMMARIZING, UH, EACH BILL AND THE, UH, CORRESPONDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ARTICLES WITHIN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE.

I'M NOT GONNA GO THROUGH THIS TABLE, BUT RATHER I DO WANNA FOCUS ON A COUPLE OF BILLS.

UH, THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE PRESENTATION

[01:00:01]

ON THE, UH, WHAT'S CONTAINED IN THOSE BILLS, BUT RATHER A SUMMARY OF THE MOST IMPACTFUL, UH, CHANGES, UH, THAT EXPLAIN WHY WE ARE AMENDING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE THE WAY WE ARE.

UH, SO THE FIRST BILL THAT I'M GONNA COVER IS SB EIGHT 40.

UH, IT STATES THAT A MUNICIPALITY SHALL ALLOW MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT, OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT, AND A ZONING CLASSIFICATION THAT ALLOWS OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, RETAIL WAREHOUSE, OR MIXED USE OR DEVELOPMENT AS AN ALLOWED USE UNDER THE CLASSIFICATION.

UH, SO RIGHT NOW, UH, MULTIFAMILY USE CAN ONLY OCCUR IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS OR MULTIFAMILY ZONED, UH, DISTRICTS.

THIS LAW OPENS IT UP TO, UH, UH, ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW THE OFFICE COMMERCIAL RETAIL WAREHOUSE.

UH, THE SECOND PART OF THAT BILL THAT I'D LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT IS THAT IT STATES THAT A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT ADOPT OR ENFORCE AN ORDINANCE ZONING RESTRICTION OR OTHER REGULATION THAT IMPOSES A LIMIT ON THE DENSITY, HEIGHT, SETBACK, OR BUFFER REQUIREMENT THAT IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN WHAT THE STATE LAW ALLOWS.

REQUIRES MORE THAN ONE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT OR MULTI-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE RESTRICTS.

THE FAR REQUIRES A DEVELOPMENT TO CONTAIN NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, AND THIS COMPONENT COMPLIES OR APPLIES TO ALL MULTIFAMILY OR MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USES.

UH, THE THIRD ELEMENT THAT I'D LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT IS THAT IT STATES OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS LAND REGULATIONS AND ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER TWO 18.

THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVE THE PERMIT OR OTHER AUTHORIZATION AND MAY NOT REQUIRE FURTHER ACTION BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF MUNICIPALITY.

UH, SO THIS MEANS WE ARE CHANGING OUR PROCEDURES TO TAKE CARE OF THE MULTI-FAMILY OR MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE SITE PLANS.

UH, ADMINISTRATIVELY, UH, SENATE BILL 15 APPLIES TO ATTRACTIVE LAND THAT WILL BE PLATTED AND LOCATED IN AREA ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IS FIVE ACRES OR MORE, AND HAS NO RECORDED PLAT STATES THAT A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT ADOPT OR ENFORCE AN ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRES RESIDENTIAL LOT TO BE LARGER THAN 3000 SQUARE FEET, WIDER THAN 30 FEET, OR DEEPER THAN 75 FEET.

UH, IT ALSO PLACES LIMITS ON WHAT THE CITY CAN REGULATE.

UH, WE CANNOT REQUIRE A SMALL LOT TO HAVE A SETBACK GREATER THAN 15 FEET FROM THE FRONT, 10 FEET FROM THE BACK, OR FIVE FEET FROM THE SIDE.

CANNOT REQUIRE COVERED PARKING OR MORE THAN ONE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT CANNOT REQUIRE MORE THAN 30% OPEN SPACE OR PERMEABLE SURFACE, UH, FEWER THAN THREE FULL STORIES, NOT EXCEEDING 10 FEET IN HEIGHT, MAXIMUM BUILDING BULK OR WALL ARTICULATION.

UH, WITH THAT, I'M GONNA GO THROUGH EACH ARTICLE OF THOSE CHANGES.

I WILL, UM, SPEND MORE TIME ON THE, THE ARTICLES THAT REQUIRED MORE CHANGES AND TRY TO, TO HIT THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THE INITIAL ARTICLES.

SO, ARTICLE ONE ARE GENERAL PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES.

UH, WE ARE CHANGING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR, UH, ZONING SIGNS TO BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY.

WE CURRENTLY REQUIRE MORE THAN ONE, DEPENDING ON THE, THE FEET OF THE FRONTAGE.

UH, WE ARE CHANGING THAT TO REQUIRE ONE SIGN PER STREET FRONTAGE.

UH, STATE LAW HAS INCREASED OR, OR HAS STATED THAT, UH, WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM SIZE OF THE SIGN.

YOU CAN SEE THAT SIDE IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM.

IT'S VERY LARGE.

UM, SO WE ARE JUST CHANGING THAT REQUIREMENT TO BE ONE PER STREET FRONTAGE.

WE ARE ADDING ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE, REQUIRING LEGAL NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE.

WE CURRENTLY, UH, PUBLISH PUBLISHED LEGAL NOTICE WITH THE FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM.

WE'LL BE ADDING THOSE NOTICES TO THE CITY'S WEBSITE.

AND THEN WE'VE UPDATED OUR ZONING PROTEST LANGUAGE TO ALIGN WITH THE STATE LAW.

ARTICLE SEVEN.

WE ARE REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT FOR CONCEPT PLANS FOR PDS WITHOUT A CONCEPT PLAN TO ALIGN WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE JURORS WITH STATE LAW AND TO KEEP PROCEDURES CONSISTENT ACROSS DEVELOPMENT TYPES.

AND ARTICLE 10 PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS.

UH, WE'VE MODIFIED OUR, UH, PARKING TABLE, UH, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW, WHICH, UH, FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPED UNDER SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT.

UH, WE ARE REQUIRING ONE OFF STREET PARKING SPACE THAT'S ACCESSED FROM A REAR LOADED ALLEY.

UH, FOR MULTIFAMILY.

WE HAVE LEFT IN OUR PREFERRED PARKING STANDARDS, WHICH WE ARE, UH, CALLING IT NOW, WHICH REQUIRES 1.5 SPACES PER ONE BEDROOM UNIT AND TWO SPACES PER TWO PLUS, UH, BEDROOMS. UH, WE WERE ADDED A, A LEASING OFFICE CALCULATION REQUIREMENT, AND THEN WE'VE, UH, ADJUSTED THE REQUIRED, UH, PARKING STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL, UH, TO ALIGN WITH STATE LAW, WHICH STATES WE CANNOT REQUIRE ONE MORE THAN ONE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT.

UH, IN THAT WE'VE ADDED THE CLUBHOUSE PARKING REQUIREMENT AT ONE SPACE PER 300 SQUARE FEET.

UH, THE LEASING OFFICE, UH, PARKING REQUIREMENT AS WELL.

AND ARTICLE 12 SUBDIVISIONS AND UTILITIES.

UH, WE'VE ADDED A SMALL LOT DISCLAIMER TO BE ADDED TO PLATS.

IT ESSENTIALLY SAYS THAT IF THIS PROPERTY IS BEING DEVELOPED UNDER THE SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT, UM, IT FOR STATE LAW MUST COMPLY

[01:05:01]

WITH THESE THINGS.

UH, THIS WILL ASSIST STAFF IN EVALUATING THE PLATS, BUT ALSO WHEN THE BUILDING PERMITS COME THROUGH, UH, WE'VE ADDED THE REQUIREMENT, THE SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT INTENDED FOR FIVE OR MORE LOTS TO HAVE A MINIMUM 30 FOOT, 31 FOOT WIDE STREET WITH AN ALLEY.

AND AGAIN, THAT ONE REQUIRED PARKING SPACE WILL BE ACCESSED OFF OF THAT ALLEY.

IN ARTICLE 13, BUILDING PERMITS AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, UH, WE'VE ADDED SOME CLARIFYING LANGUAGE, MAKING SURE THAT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT, THE PROPERTY, UH, MUST BE PLOTTED AND ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS OBTAINED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS, SITE PLANS, UM, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT EVEN THOUGH, UH, THOSE ACTIONS ARE NOW ADMINISTRATIVELY UNDER THE LAW, UH, THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THOSE APPROVALS.

IN ARTICLE 16 SITE PLAN APPROVAL, UH, WE'VE ADDED THAT SITE PLANS FOR MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND ACTED UPON BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, OR DESIGNEE UPON A RECOMMENDATION BY THE DRC, UM, PURSUANT TO OUR PROCEDURES.

AND THEN THOSE SITE PLANS FOR MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE EDC, EXCLUDING WHAT IS ALLOWED UNDER STATE LAW, UH, SHALL BE DENIED.

AND A ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN SHALL REQUEST SHALL BE REQUIRED.

WE HAVE MODIFIED ARTICLE 22 OF OUR FEE SCHEDULE, UM, KEEPING THE 400, UM, FEE FOR A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT.

UM, WE'VE, UM, UPDATED, UH, IT TO INCLUDE A MULTIFAMILY ADMINISTRATIVE, UH, WHICH IS 1000 PLUS 40 PER ACRE, WHICH IS THE SAME, UH, FEE FOR A REGULAR SITE PLAN.

UH, WE HAD SOME DUPLICATE TABLES THAT WE'VE REMOVED.

WE'RE ALSO REMOVING A STAFF FILING FEE FOR PLOTS, WHICH IS A SERVICE WE DO NOT OFFER.

UH, WE'VE ADDED A $50 FEE FOR ZONING SIGNS.

UH, THE LARGER SIGNS REQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW ARE MORE EXPENSIVE, AND SO WE ARE ADDING THAT FEE INTO THE, THE COST, UH, FOR THE APPLICANT.

UH, WE'VE ALSO UPDATED OUR ADVISORY COMMITTEE DEFINITION TO MATCH STATE LAW AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL NO LONGER BE A PART OF THAT ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

IN ARTICLE 23, MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN, UH, WE HAVE ADDED LANGUAGE THAT STATES A TIA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE CONVERSION OF BUILDINGS TO MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE.

THAT'S SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATE LAW.

AND THEN ARTICLE 26, MOBILE MANUFACTURED MODULAR HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE REGULATIONS.

UH, WE REVIEW REMOVED THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN SUP, UM, WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL RE ZONING DISTRICT, ALLOWING IT BY RIGHT.

IT STILL DOES REQUIRE, UH, THAT THE PROPERTY BE, UH, 20 ACRES.

IN ARTICLE 30 DEFINITIONS.

WE'VE, UH, REMOVED HOME OCCUPATION AND REPLACED IT WITH HOME-BASED BUSINESS TO MIRROR THE STATE LAW DEFINITION, WHICH INCLUDES, UH, THERE ARE NO IMPACT, A HOME-BASED BUSINESS.

AND WE'VE ALSO ADDED THE SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT DEFINITION IN ARTICLE FOUR PERMISSIBLE USES.

WE'VE ADDED LANGUAGE THAT ADDRESSES MULTI-FAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE.

UM, AND WE'VE UPDATED OUR, OUR LAND USE CHARTS TO REFLECT THE STATE LAW.

WE'VE UPDATED FOOTNOTES AS WELL.

UH, SO ON THE SCREEN IS A SNIPPET, UH, YOU CAN SEE THAT ESSENTIALLY SAYS THAT MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS ARE PERMITTED IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER TWO 18 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AS AMENDED PROVIDED SUCH JESUS HAVE NOT BEEN OTHERWISE, UH, LAW LAWFULLY PROHIBITED OR WAIVED.

UM, SO THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT ARE NOT ADDRESSED IN CHAPTER TWO 18, UM, FALL TO THE MULTIFAMILY THREE DISTRICT FOR MULTIFAMILY OR MIXED USE DISTRICT FOR MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE.

UM, FOR ARTICLE SIX, OUR DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, WE'VE ADDED LANGUAGE THAT ADDRESSES THE SMALL LOT DEVELOPMENT.

IF IT'S, UH, FOR FEWER LOTS, IT WILL, UH, FALL TO SINGLE FAMILY SIX ZONING CO UH, REGULATIONS THAT WE'RE STILL ABLE TO REQUIRE.

IF IT'S FIVE OR MORE, THEN IT FALLS TO APPENDIX W.

WE'VE ADDED A COLUMN IN OUR SUMMARY TABLE FOR THE SMALL OT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

WE'VE ALSO ADDED LANGUAGE FOR MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AGAIN, UM, THAT STATES THAT, UH, THE PROVISIONS NOT CONTAINED IN CHAPTER TWO 18 FALL TO THE MF THREE DISTRICT FOR MULTIFAMILY USE OR THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OR MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL USE.

UH, AND APPENDIX W RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

WE TOOK WHAT WE CURRENTLY REQUIRE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND MODIFIED IT FOR THE SMALL OT DEVELOPMENT.

SO WE'VE ADJUSTED, UM, FOR EXAMPLE THE, UH, AREA AND THE ALLOT WIDTH, UH, TO WHAT THE STATE NOW ALLOWS AND MADE SOME MODIFICATIONS, UM, TO WHAT IS IS POSSIBLE FOR THE SMALLER LOT.

FOR EXAMPLE, UH, WE REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREES BECAUSE ON A LOT THAT SIZE, THERE'S NO ROOM TO PLANT THREE TREES.

UM, FOR THE APPENDIX W RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE

[01:10:01]

MULTIFAMILY AND MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, UH, WE'VE STATED THAT IF YOU'RE IN, UH, ESSENTIALLY THE NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS AND WITHIN OUR CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT, YOU HAVE TO MEET OUR DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS THAT IS NOT, UM, A CHOICE ANYMORE.

UH, OR A CHOICE.

UH, MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS, UH, CURRENTLY HAVE TO PROVIDE AMENITIES AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY MEET THOSE DESIGN RECOMMENDATION DEPENDS ON, UM, HOW MUCH AMENITIES THEY MUST PROVIDE.

SO, UM, MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT PROVIDE OUR, UH, DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS, UM, AND OUR PREFERRED PARKING STANDARDS.

AND ARTICLE 10 CAN SELECT FEATURES FROM TWO OF THREE CATEGORIES AND PROVIDE A CLUBHOUSE OF AT LEAST 3000 SQUARE FEET, EXCLUDING THE LEASING OFFICE.

UH, THE DEVELOPMENTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS MUST PROVIDE AMENITIES FROM ALL THREE CATEGORIES AND A LARGER CLUBHOUSE AT 7,000 SQUARE FEET.

UH, THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION ON ALL THOSE CHANGES.

I KNOW I WENT VERY QUICKLY.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

I JUST WANNA SAY THANK YOU, FIRST OF ALL, BECAUSE YOU HAVE, YOU AND THE STAFF HAVE DONE A TREMENDOUS JOB AND WE'RE GONNA GIVE YOU A HAND FOR THAT.

OH, THANK YOU.

THAT IS A LOT OF WORK.

WHEN LEGISLATION CHANGES, YOU GUYS HAVE TO JUMP AND, AND GO THROUGH ALL THESE HOOPS AND STILL GET YOUR DAY-TO-DAY JOB DONE.

SO WE THANK YOU FOR THE WORK.

THANK YOU VERY, VERY MUCH.

AND LIKE, THIS IS A LOT FOR US TO ABSORB, YOU KNOW, SO THAT'S WHY WE RELY SO HEAVILY ON, ON WHAT YOU DO.

'CAUSE WHAT YOU DO IS IMPORTANT.

IT'S IMPORTANT TO THE CITY.

SO, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR SAVANNAH? I THINK YOU DID AN EXCELLENT JOB.

AND HATS OFF TO YOU, MA'AM.

THANK YOU AGAIN.

LET'S GIVE HER ANOTHER HAND.

OKAY.

DO WE NEED TO HAVE ANY, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? COMMISSIONERS ANY DISCUSSION? THAT BEING SAID, UM, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION, UNLESS SOMEBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IT.

I'LL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NINE TM 25 0 8 0 0 0 3 AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS.

CAN I GET A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

OKAY.

I HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY MYSELF, CHERYL SMITH, TO APPROVE ITEM NINE AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATION.

AND A SECOND BY CHERYL SMITH AND BY SECOND BY JANIE AKARI.

ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THAT BEING THE LAST CASE.

THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 7:44 PM THANK YOU.