* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. READY [00:00:01] TO ROLL. WELCOME [Planning & Zoning Briefing 06232025] TO THE STAFF BRIEFING OF THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE MEETING OF JUNE 23RD, 2025. I'M CHERYL SMITH, CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THIS STAFF A BRIEFING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING IS HERE BY COLLEGE TO ORDER AT 5:30 PM THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS WHERE THE STAFF BRIEFS THE COMMISSION AND PREVIEWS THE CASES ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA COMMISSION MEMBERS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT MAY FACILITATE THE MEETING AND THE PRESENTATION OF THE CASES. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN DURING THE BRIEFING. PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACE DURING THE REGULAR MEETING, WHICH WILL BEGIN EARLIER THAN 6:30 PM I NOT CONDUCTED. ROLL CALL MEMBERS TO CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AND RECALL YOUR NAME, PLEASE SAY HERE. CHERYL SMITH. HERE. TY CHAPMAN. MICHELLE MADDEN. CHRISTOPHER OLLEY. DO FRANK GONZALEZ. HERE. JAMIE MENDEZ. ARI VICTOR MEDINA. JOHN FICO. HERE. ANGELA VONNE. HERE, LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT EXCEPT FOR TODD CHAPMAN, MICHELLE MADDEN, JAMIE MENDEZ, ARI AND VICTOR MEDINA. ARE THERE ANY ITEMS FOR THE EXECUTIVE SESSION? NO MA'AM. STAFF DIRECTLY PRESENT. I KNOW EVERYBODY. LUCKY EVENING . ALRIGHT, OUR FIRST ITEM NUMBER TWO SUP 2 5 0 6 0 0 2 0 IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A CONTRACTOR. SHOP OUTSIDE STORAGE WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT LOCATED AT 5 0 2 WEST OAKDALE ROAD. AS I SAID, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CONTRACTOR SHOP WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND IT IS WITHIN THE SH 1 61 CORRIDOR OVERLAY. HERE'S AN AERIAL OF OUR PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS THAT INCLUDE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES SURROUNDING LAND USES INCLUDE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES, TRUCKING FACILITIES, OUTSIDE STORAGE, AND INDUSTRIAL USES. AND OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED AND CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY ZACHARY CONSTRUCTION. HERE'S A STREET VIEW OF THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. SO WE HAVE MEI INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS MOVING FROM ANOTHER CITY AND WANTING TO OPERATE THE CONTRACTOR. SHOP OUTSIDE STORAGE AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT. AT THIS LOCATION, THEY'RE A SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR THAT SPECIALIZES IN MACHINERY, MOVING, SPECIALTY, CREATING AND PACKAGING SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES. ZACHARY CONSTRUCTION IS CONSOLIDATING ITS BUSINESS OPERATIONS TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND MEI INTENDS ON LOCATING ITS OPERATIONS AT THE FRONT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE AREA OUTLINED IN RED IS THE AREA THAT MEI PROPOSES TO USE. PLANNED SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INTERIOR FENCING AND GATING AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING OFFICE TRAILERS. MEI WILL ACCESS THE SITE THROUGH THE PRIMARY ACCESS POINT, WHICH IS KIND OF CENTRALLY LOCATED THERE. THERE IS AN EXISTING EIGHT FOOT SOLID WOOD WOOD FENCE THAT SCREENS THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY FROM OAKDALE ROAD. WE SENT OUT 12 NOTICES. TWO WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR, ZERO RETURNED OPPOSED. OUR IN FAVOR, UH, NOTICES ARE HIGHLIGHTED THERE IN GREEN, DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SITE AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDATION FROM OUR DRC COMMITTEE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY AND DELINEATION OF UNI USES GENERALLY COMPLY WITH THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MEASURING A MINIMUM OF 12 FEET BY 12 FEET INSIDE. THAT COMPLIES WITH ARTICLE EIGHT OF RUDC. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONERS COMMISSION. IS MEI THE APPLICANT OR IS ZACH THE APPLICANT? MEI THE APPLICANT. OKAY, SO THEY'LL JUST BE A TENANT. THEY WILL BE, YES, THAT'S CORRECT. I ONLY HAVE ONE QUESTION. I NOTICED THAT THIS GROUP WAS MOVING FROM MY GRAPEVINE. GRAPEVINE, YES. AND SO WHAT IS THE TIMEFRAME FOR THE STAGING? BECAUSE THEY SAID GETTING, GETTING EQUIPMENT, BRINGING IT IN AND STAGING AND THEN IT GOING OUT. IS THERE LIKE A TIMEFRAME OR IS THAT IT JUST DEPENDS ON THE, THE SPECIFIC JOB. I THINK IT DEPENDS ON THE SPECIFIC JOB. GOT TO A POINT WHERE IT GOT TOO BUSY. UNLESS THEY WON'T OVERBOOK, I GUESS THE, THE APPLICANT'S GONNA BE HERE TONIGHT. CHAIR. I THINK THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION FOR THEM. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THIS REPRESENTATION? OKAY, THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER THREE, WE HAVE ANOTHER SUP REQUEST, SUP 25 0 5 0 0 1 16. [00:05:03] THIS IS FOR AN EXISTING USE RIOS BREWING COMPANY, LOCATED AT 10 15 IKEA PLACE IN SUITE 500. SO THIS REQUEST IS FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOL SALES, INCLUDING ENTERTAINMENT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 2 94. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ALSO IN THE SAME PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2 94 LAND USES INCLUDE IKEA, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES UNDEVELOPED LAND AND THE FUTURE TOP GOLF SITE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED WITH RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES. HERE IS OUR SUBJECT PROPERTY. SO RIOS BREWING COMPANY IS A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT. IT IS OPEN AND OPERATING TODAY. THE PURPOSE OF THEIR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS TO ALLOW FOR A 25 SQUARE FOOT AREA THAT IS STANDING ROOM ONLY. THERE WILL NOT BE FIXTURES OR FURNITURE, UM, TO ALLOW FOR LIVE MUSICIANS OR DJS. THE CURRENT BUSINESS HOURS ARE 11:00 AM TO 11:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY. UM, THEY'LL HAVE LIVE MUSIC ON WEEKENDS ONLY AND THE LIVE MUSIC AND DJ OPERATIONS WILL ONLY BE INSIDE THE RESTAURANT. SIX NOTICES WERE SENT. ZERO RETURNED IN FAVOR AND SERIAL RETURNED OPPOSED. AND STAFF WOULD LIKE TO FOLLOW THE DRC RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT OPERATIONS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TEXAS FOOD ESTABLISHMENT RULES AND LOCAL ORDINANCES REGARDING FOOD SERVICE AND THAT NO LIVE MUSIC BE ALLOWED OUTDOORS. LIVE MUSIC PLAYED INDOORS SHALL NOT BE AMPLIFIED ON OUTDOOR SPEAKERS. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. ? YES. THANK YOU. UM, DO YOU THINK THERE ARE A TENANT ALREADY THERE OR HOW, WHAT'S THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EXISTING TENANT AND AND RIOS GROUP? IS THAT TWO DIFFERENT THINGS? THAT RIGHT. IT'S THE SAME TENANT. IT'S MR. RIOS. YEAH. OKAY. AND, AND THE REASON I PAUSED FOR A MOMENT ON THIS SLIDE IS I, I MADE AN ERROR THERE ON THE BUSINESS HOURS. SO THEY ARE OPEN MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY, 11:00 AM TO 11:00 PM PLEASE DISREGARD THE SATURDAY AND SUNDAY. I'LL REMOVE THAT. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? UH, THIS A TE QUESTION. DOES AMPLIFY MEAN THE SAME AS PLAYING? CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THE MUSIC? IT DOES, YES. SO, AND THEY CAN'T PUT THE MUSIC OUTSIDE? NO, SIR. OKAY. SOME INDOOR VENUES WILL PLAY WHATEVER'S PLAYING OUTSIDE AND PLAY, BUT YOU'RE THAT FINE. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? LOOKS GREAT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I SEE. GOOD EVENING. I HAVE A COMPANION ITEM. THIS IS, UM, ITEM FOUR. THIS IS A COMPANION ITEM FOR NUMBER FIVE AS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT. SO THE REQUEST HERE IS TO AMEND THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN ON MAP FOR THE REMOVAL OF A COLLECTOR TWO LANE UNDIVIDED ROADWAY. THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE ROADWAY. IT'S LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF THE, UH, INTERSTATE 30 EASTBOUND FRONTAGE ROADS. I REALIZE I PUT WESTBOUND ON THERE, UM, NORTH OF EAST TARN DRIVE AND EAST OF STADIUM DRIVE. UH, THE REASON THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS IS BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT IN QUESTION, UH, SHOWED IN THE RED OUTLINE, UH, IS NOT PROPOSING TO BUILD THE ROADWAY AS PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT. THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT ROADWAY BE REMOVED SO THEY COULD DEVELOP THE SITE AS THEY'VE ENVISIONED. AND, UH, THE REASON WE'RE NOT SHIFTING THE ROADWAY AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY IS THEN IT WOULD SHIFT THAT BURDEN ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, UH, UNNECESSARILY. SO WE'RE JUST MOVING AHEAD WITH THE, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. PRODUCT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WAS DONE, UH, TO ANALYZE THE IMPACTS OF REMOVING THE ROADWAY. WHAT THEY DID IS THEY ASSUMED A 3% TRAFFIC GROWTH, UH, YEAR OVER YEAR. AND THEY ALSO ASSUMED THAT ALL OF THE USES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WERE CONSTRUCTED AND ESTIMATES WERE GIVEN AS WELL AS THE EXTENSION OF FIFTH STREET SHOWN BY THE BLACK LINES ON THE EAST WITH A OTHER CONNECTOR OVER TO BELTLINE. AS WE HAVE IN OUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN. THE RED LINE IN QUESTION IS THE ONE THAT THEY'RE WANTING TO REMOVE. SO YOU CAN SEE HOW IT FITS IN TO THE, THE STUDY AREA. AND WHAT THEY DID WAS A 10 YEAR BUILD VERSUS NO BUILD SCENARIO. SO WHAT WOULD THE AREA LOOK LIKE WITH THE ROAD, WHAT THE AREA LOOKS LIKE WITHOUT THE ROAD. SO ESSENTIALLY THE RED LINE THERE IS WHAT ENDED UP LOOKING LIKE THE NO BUILD SCENARIO. SO THEY WOULD HAVE A SHARED ACCESS BETWEEN THEIR PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE TO REALLY HELP MOVE TRAFFIC ONTO THE FRONTAGE ROAD INSTEAD OF HAVING IT GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO TARRANT. [00:10:02] SO YOU CAN SEE THE RESULTS, UM, THERE ON, IN THE BOX ON THE TOP LEFT OF THE IMAGE, YOU CAN SEE THAT'S THE SHARED ACCESS THAT WOULD ESSENTIALLY REPLACE THE ROADS FUNCTION. IT JUST DOESN'T GO ALL THE WAY SOUTH. AND THEN THEY HAVE AN EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY. UH, THEY'RE OFF TARANT TO PREVENT TRAFFIC FROM USING THAT AS AN INSURANCE, NOT MIXING THE SCHOOL TRAFFIC. UH, BUT OVERALL THE AREA IT IS SLIGHTLY WORSE WITH IN TERMS OF DELAY BECAUSE WE'RE, WE'RE REMOVING A ROADWAY, BUT THE EFFECTS ARE NEGLIGIBLE. SO, UM, OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT, UM, THE PROPOSED SUP SITE FLAM FOR A MULTI STANLEY PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED SO THAT THE REMOVAL OF THE ROAD IS NECESSARY WHILE STOP LEAVES THE AREA WOULD BE BETTER WITH THE ROAD. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS STATES THAT THE REMOVAL OF THIS PROPOSED MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN ROAD FROM THE PLAN WOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE AREA. DANG, , THAT'S A MOUTHFUL. SO LIKE I SAID, THIS IS A COMPANION ITEM FOR THE NEXT ITEM, BUT DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS SPECIFIC TO THIS? I JUST HAVE ONE WITH REGARD TO THE ROAD. WHEN YOU, ON THE ROAD THAT I GUESS AFFECTS ALL THE TRAFFIC, THE MAPS GO AND ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS. HOW'S THAT? DOES THAT GET TO REPORT INTO THE STATE OR THE COUNTY OR ANYTHING ABOUT THE ? NO. SO THE ROAD DOESN'T EXIST TODAY. OH. UM, IT'S JUST VACANT LAND THAT, THAT IT WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OKAY. RUNNING THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THIS AREA. THE WAY THAT THEY'RE WANTING TO JOIN THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE THERE TODAY. NEVER AN OFFICIAL ROAD. NO. BUT IF THEY WANTED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SITE, THEY WOULD EITHER BE DEDICATING THE RIGHT OF WAY OR BUILDING THE ROAD AS PART OF THE PROJECT, BUT THEN YOU'RE WORRYING ABOUT SETBACKS RIGHT OF WAY, WHICH IS WIDER THAN YOU WOULD NEED FOR AN INTERNAL ACCESS DRIVE. SO IT REALLY DOESN'T MAKE THEIR PROJECT FEASIBLE. NO, I GET THAT. I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THE EVIDENCE. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? BE CLEAR RIGHT? THAT WE'RE SAYING THAT, UH, THE ROADWAY WILL BE ELIMINATED HALFWAY, RIGHT? IT SEEMS LIKE HE'S GONNA REROUTE IT. IS THAT THE PLAN? SO ESSENTIALLY, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WERE LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN THAT, THAT SAVANNAH WILL BE PRESENTING HERE SHORTLY, REALLY THE ROAD WOULD, ACCORDING TO OUR PLAN, CUT THROUGH THIS PROPERTY AND GO ALL THE WAY TO TARRAN MM-HMM . SO NOW THE PROPERTY'S STILL GONNA BE ABLE TO HAVE SOME ACCESS BETWEEN THIS AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES LIKE THE ROAD WOULD DO. UM, YOU JUST WON'T HAVE THAT FULL THROUGH MOVEMENT, RIGHT? SO SOME OF THE TRAFFIC FROM TARRANT INSTEAD OF BEING ABLE TO CUT THROUGH, JUST GOES OVER TO STADIUM OR GOES OVER TO BELTLINE OR FUTURE EXTENSION OF FIFTH IF, IF WE WERE ABLE TO EVER DO THAT. SO THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF DELAY THERE THAT WE'RE HAVING TO WORK WITH. ANY HAVE QUESTIONS ON THAT? OKAY, THANKS. THAT WAS A MOUTH. I DON'T THINK I'VE EVER HAD ANYONE LIKE THAT. YOU HAVEN'T PRESENTED LIKE THAT. NOT REALLY. . ALRIGHT. NOW THIS ITEM IS THE RELATED, UH, PROJECT TO THE, UH, MTP AMENDMENT THAT BRETT JUST PRESENTED ON. SO IT'S A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AND A SITE PLAN FOR A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. YOU CAN SEE LOCATION OUTLINED IN YELLOW ON THE SCREEN. UH, IT IS ZONE PD TWO 17, WHICH DOES ALLOW MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS WITH CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO THIS IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE TYPICALLY SEE WITH MULTIFAMILY. UH, ON THIS SCREEN YOU CAN SEE THE SITE PLAN. UH, THEY'RE PROPOSING 301 UNITS ACROSS SEVEN BUILDINGS. AND AGAIN, AS BRETT MENTIONED, THEY'RE PROPOSING ACCESS OFF OF MUTUAL VOLT DRIVE OFF OF I 30 FRONTAGE ROAD. UM, SO THEY ARE MEETING, UM, SOME OF OUR DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THEY ARE REQUESTING SOME VARIANCES, UH, NAMELY THEIR SETBACK FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WHICH IS TO THE EAST, AND THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OR MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE, UH, BEDROOM UNITS. AND THEY ARE MEETING OUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. UH, THEY ARE REQUESTING SOME, UH, VARIANCES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. UH, THE FIRST IS TO THE SITE TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED. UH, THEY'RE PROPOSING 77 TREES WHEN 203 ARE REQUIRED. AND THEN SINCE THEY ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE EAST, WE DO REQUIRE A MASONRY SCREENING WALL. UM, THEY'RE PROPOSING A WROUGHT IRON FENCE. UH, THESE ARE THEIR PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THE MATERIALS INCLUDE A FIBER, CEMENT, SIDING, AND BRICK. AND OUR APPENDIX W REGULATIONS MAKE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT THE DESIGN. UH, ONE OF THOSE IS THAT 60%, UM, CANNOT, UH, OR A SINGLE MATERIAL OR COLOR COUNT ACCOUNT FOR 60%. SO THEY DO HAVE SOME, UM, FACADES THAT HAVE FIBER CEMENT THAT ACCOUNTS FOR MORE THAN THAT. AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT THEY HAVE TO MEET ALL OF OUR AMENITY REQUIREMENTS. UH, SO THIS IS A RENDERING OF THE PROJECT. YOU CAN SEE THE CLUBHOUSE AND THE MULTIFAMILY. UH, THE ROAD IN THE PICTURE WOULD BE THE, UH, MUTUAL ACCESS, UH, ROAD OFF OF I 30. UM, SINCE THEY ARE ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY, THEY DID PROVIDE THIS KIND OF LINE OF SIGHT EXHIBIT, UH, SHOWING THE, [00:15:01] UM, THE APARTMENT BUILDING, UH, THE SPACE IN BETWEEN AND THEN THE HOUSE. UM, SO YOU CAN SEE KIND OF AT THE BOTTOM, THAT LINE IS KIND OF THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE. UH, THE APPLICANT WILL MENTION THAT DURING THEIR PRESENTATION AS, UM, SOME RATIONALE FOR SOME OF THE VARIANCES THAT THEY'RE REQUESTING. UM, SO AGAIN, I COVERED THE MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE BEDROOM UNITS. THEY'RE REQUESTING 74.4%. UH, THE UDC CAPS THAT AT 60% THE SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, UH, THEY'RE PROPOSING A VARIABLE WITH SETBACK. UH, ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE RANGES FROM 51.5 FEET TO 100 FEET. UH, PD TWO 17 DOES NOT HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT, BUT IT DOES STATE THAT FOR EVERY, UH, ONE FOOT IN HEIGHT, THERE HAS TO BE TWO FEET IN SETBACK, UM, FROM A LOT IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. UH, SO 102 FEET WOULD BE REQUIRED. UH, AGAIN, THEY'RE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO THE SITE TREES. UM, THEY'RE PROPOSING 77 WHEN 203 ARE REQUIRED. AND THEN FOR THE FENCE ADJACENT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, THEY'RE PROPOSING A ROT IRON FENCE INSTEAD OF A MASONRY SCREENING WALL. AND WE DID RECEIVE WRITTEN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST. UH, THIS IS FROM A ADJACENT PROPERTY, ONE OF THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LOCATED AT 8 0 1 WALTER HILL DRIVE. UM, SO THIS IS PART OF THE GATEWAY MASTER PLAN AREA. UM, THIS PLAN WAS A CITY INITIATED MASTER PLAN FOR THE I 30 AND BELTLINE CORRIDORS. UH, THE PLAN WAS DONE IN 2017 AND MANAGED BY OUR CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN IS TO CREATE A UNIQUE AND APPEALING MIXED USE AND LIFESTYLE ENVIRONMENT. UH, SO THE PLAN INCLUDES ABOUT 124 ACRES AND DEPICTS RETAIL MULTIFAMILY OFFICE AND HOTEL USES. UM, SO THE PD, WHICH IS THE UNDERLYING ZONING FOR THE REQUEST, WAS CREATED IN 1996 AND DOES ALLOW MULTIFAMILY USE WITH CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO THE GATEWAY PLAN IS A LITTLE BIT MORE RECENT VISION FOR THAT AREA. AND THE PROPERTY DOES, UM, ALIGN WITH THAT GATEWAY PLAN. UM, SO YOU CAN SEE THE MULTIFAMILY AND YELLOW NUMBER NINE. AND THEN THE OFFICE AND RETAIL FIVE AND 11 ARE THE LOCATIONS OF THE THE PROJECT. UM, SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY REQUIRES AN SUP FOR MULTIFAMILY USES PER PD TWO 17. THE PROPOSED USES ALIGNED WITH THE GENERAL LOCATION OF MULTIFAMILY, UH, PER THE GATEWAY MASTER PLAN, BUT THE ELEVATIONS ARE SOMEWHAT INCONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN GOALS FOR THE, UH, GATEWAY PLAN AREA. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHOOSES TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SUB SLASH SITE PLAN. UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL. NUMBER ONE, THE PROJECT SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE TREES. AND NUMBER TWO, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND MITIGATION PLAN WITH THE APPLICATION FOR THEIR FINAL PLAT. UM, THIS IS WHAT THE PLAN, UH, THE DEVELOPER PLANS TO DO. BUT AGAIN, UH, STAFF JUST WANTED TO ARTICULATE THAT REQUIREMENT FOR THE TREE SURVEY AND MITIGATION PLAN SINCE THIS IS TYPICALLY REVIEWED AT THE SITE PLAN. AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. MR. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE? I, I HAVE A QUESTION. UM, WHY SO MANY? I KNOW WHY WE SO MANY VARIANCES. IT SEEMS A LOT CONSIDERING WE ARE ALREADY MOVING THE ROAD. IT SEEMS LIKE THEY'RE ASKING A LOT AND THE, THE DEVELOPER WILL BE HERE AND KIND OF GO INTO A BIT OF THEIR REASONING BEHIND, UM, SOME OF THESE VARIANCES. BUT I WILL NOTE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE MAKES IT CHALLENGING. IT'S NOT A FLAT SITE WHERE THEY COULD PUT THE BUILDINGS ANYWHERE. AND SO PART OF THAT HAS PLAYED INTO THEIR DESIGN, BUT I'LL LET THE APPLICANT FULLY ANSWER THAT QUESTION DURING THE MEETING COMMISSIONS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, LES? YES. UH, SO WHAT IS THE, UH, STAFF, UH, AT LEAST ALIGNED WITH THE SETBACK? UM, IS THAT ALSO A RECOMMENDATION OR THAT'S A VARIANCE REQUEST. UM, AND ULTIMATELY IT'S UP TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. I WILL NOTE THAT THE PD TWO 17 CALCULATES A GREATER SETBACK REQUIREMENT THAN OUR MULTIFAMILY THREE ZONING DISTRICT. UM, SO IF YOU WERE CALCULATING THE SETBACKS BASED ON A MULTIFAMILY THREE REQUIREMENT, THEY WOULD MEET IT FOR MOST OF THE BUILDINGS. THERE WOULD BE JUST ONE EXCEPTION. UM, AND THAT, THAT BUILDING IS THE CLOSEST TO I 30. OKAY. AND THEN THE OTHER QUESTION WOULD BE ON THE MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE BIT UNITS MM-HMM . YOU KNOW, IT SAYS 60% VERSUS 74. DID THEY SAY WHY THEY WANT TO DO THAT? THIS IS A FAIRLY COMMON, UH, VARIANCE REQUEST. IT, IT REALLY DEPENDS ON KIND OF, UM, WHO THEY'RE MARKETING THEIR, THEIR PROJECT TO, UH, SINGLE FAMILY, OR EXCUSE ME, SINGLE BEDROOM UNITS. UM, WE PROBABLY SEE THIS, YOU KNOW, EVERY OTHER MULTIFAMILY REQUEST. AND THEN I THIS QUESTION, UM, ABOUT THE FENCING? YES. WHY WR IRON OPPOSED TO, AND, AND THE STAFF AGREE WITH THAT. SO A AGAIN, THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE AND, AND CAN WALK YOU THROUGH THE RATIONALE BEHIND ALL OF THOSE. I DO HAVE THEIR LINE OF SIGHT, UH, EXHIBIT PULLED UP ON THE SCREEN, WHICH SHOWS THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE. SO YOU CAN [00:20:01] SEE, UH, THE DASH LINE KIND OF IN THE MIDDLE. UM, LET'S SEE RIGHT HERE. THIS IS WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS, AND THIS IS KIND OF THAT ELEVATION AT THAT LOCATION. UM, SO A, UH, A WALL, UH, WOULD GO PROBABLY UP TO HERE. UM, SO IT, IT, IT DIPS DOWN. AND, UM, AGAIN, I'LL LET THEM EXPLAIN, BUT THEIR, THEIR REASONING IS THAT IT'S NOT GONNA MAKE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE GIVEN THAT TOPOGRAPHY. THANK YOU. SAVANNAH, COULD YOU GO TO THAT BIRD EYE VIEW THAT THIS YES. OKAY. SO, UM, ARE THEY THE DEVELOPER OF THAT ENTIRE PROJECT OR JUST THE MULTIFAMILY? JUST THE MULTIFAMILY. AND THIS IMAGE ON THE SCREEN WAS A VISIONING, UH, A CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE CORRIDOR THAT WAS PART OF THE GATEWAY PLAN THAT, THAT THE CITY DID. OKAY. SO THAT'S NOT FROM ANY, THAT THIS IS NOT FROM ANY DEVELOPER. OKAY, GOTCHA. BUT THIS IS SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN USING AS A BENCHMARK TO EVALUATE THESE PROJECTS AS THEY COME FORWARD. SO THEY HAVEN'T PRESENTED YOU WITH ANYTHING, I MEAN ANY, ANY PAPERWORK, ANY, ANY DESIGN OF ANYTHING. THE, THE DEVELOPER FOR THE MULTIFAMILY. FOR THE MULTIFAMILY, YEAH. THE, THIS GATEWAY CORRIDOR ENCOMPASSES ABOUT 124 ACRES, AND IT'S MULTIPLE PROPERTY OWNERS. SO, UH, WE WILL SEE THESE INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS COME THROUGH AS THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS DECIDE TO BEGIN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. IT WON'T BE EVERYTHING IS DONE AT ONE TIME. IT REQUIRED TO DO THAT YET, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? CORRECT. THIS IS SIMILAR TO ANY OTHER INSTANCE WHERE YOU HAVE DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS ON DIFFERENT TIMETABLES. AGAIN, THIS WAS JUST KIND OF A, A VISION FOR THE CORRIDOR THAT WAS PUT TOGETHER IN 2017. IS IT FAIR TO SAY, OR MAYBE YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT SO WHAT, I MEAN, I, I'M SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH THIS GATEWAY VISION OR PLAN, BUT IF THEY TAKE THE MULTI-FAMILY SPACES, DOES THAT MEAN THAT LIKE IF SOMEBODY WAS TO COME AND DEVELOP TWO YEARS LATER THAT THEY'RE NOT, IT'S, IT'S NOT MEANT FOR MULTIFAMILY, IT'S GONNA BE MORE FOR OFFICE AND STUFF. YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING? LIKE TAKING THAT? YES. SO IT ALLOTMENT, WE WOULD REFER BACK TO THE PD TWO 17 ZONING, WHICH AGAIN ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY WITH APPROVAL OF AN SUP. THIS IS JUST ONE OTHER COMPONENT OF THE VISION FOR THAT CORRIDOR. NOW THEY, THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO MULTIFAMILY, UM, ANYWHERE IN PD TWO 17 THAT ALLOWS IT WITH APPROVAL OF A AN SUP. SO THIS GATEWAY PLAN HAS BEEN USED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO HELP GUIDE DEVELOPERS REQUEST AN INCREASE IN THIS AREA WITH A LONG TERM VISION TO CREATE A UPTOWN TYPE VIBE. MM-HMM . AROUND LONE STAR PARK. UH, WITH THAT, THEY INCLUDED NOW TO THE DETAIL OFFICE, SQUARE FOOTAGE, MULTIFAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS FOR EACH ONE OF THESE. AND SO WHEN A DEVELOPER COMES IN, WE USE THIS AS JUST A REFERENCE TO SAY, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT COUNCIL AGREED TO WITH REGARD TO RESOLUTION. AND THEN WE HAVE TO LOOK AT, OKAY, THE ZONING WAS INTERESTING HERE IS THIS PENSION WAS DONE DEVELOP, BUT DID NOT NECESSARILY INCLUDE PLANNING. WE'RE USED TO ENFORCE IT OR GUIDE USED IT AS A GUIDE, BUT THE ZONING WAS NEVER CHANGED TO REFLECT THIS. SO THE ZONING IS FROM 1990S AND THIS IS 2017. OH, WOW. SO, AND, AND RASHAN, I I THINK THAT I, I I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I'M JUST NOT WORRIED. I DON I WANNA SAY IT THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT'S HOW PEOPLE SEE GRAND PRAIRIE. THAT'S ON I 30. A LOT OF EYEBALLS SEE THEIR DIRT. AGREED. AND IT WOULD BE NICE IF IN THE FUTURE THOUGH WE'RE NOT, WE CAN'T CONTROL IT, THAT IT ISN'T LIKE YOU'RE SAYING A TRUE MIXED USE KIND OF THING AS OPPOSED TO NOTHING BUT APARTMENTS RIGHT. ALONG I 30, WHICH SOUNDS LIKE IT COULD BECOME NOTHING BUT APARTMENTS BECAUSE IF I UNDERSTOOD WHAT SAVANNAH SAID, THE NEXT APPLICANT TWO YEARS LATER COULD COME AND SAY, YES, THAT WAS THE PLAN OF GATEWAY, BUT WE'D LIKE TO HAVE AN SUP FOR MORE MULTIFAMILY THERE. YES, YES. THIS ISN'T NECESSARILY BINDING AS A GUIDE, BUT IT'S LEFT UP AT DZ AND COUNCIL TO SAY, LOOK, THIS IS WHAT WE WANT AND SAY NO TO THE SUP OF THE UNDERLYING ZONE PR THE FLOW. WHAT WAS THAT DONE? SO THIS WAS DONE BEFORE THE FLOW, I GUESS, BECAUSE THAT WOULD'VE BEEN THE MEASURE THEY WOULD'VE BEEN ABLE TO USE AGAINST THAT, RIGHT? YES. SO THE PHONE LOOKS LIKE IT WAS ADJUSTED BASED ON THIS TO EXCUSE. SO, BUT THIS IS HORIZONTAL EXCUSE. SO THE WAY IT'S SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS YOU HAVE TO PINPOINT LOCATIONS FOR MULTIFAMILY, BUT THEN OFFICER RETAIL ON DIFFERENT PARCELS. IT'S NOT A, A VERTICAL USE WHERE YOU HAVE LIKE LOWER LEVEL [00:25:01] RETAIL AND THEN MULTIFAMILY AT TOP. SO SOMEBODY CAN COME IN AND SAY, ON THIS PARCEL, I JUST WANNA DO THE MULTIFAMILY PART. AND THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE HERE. AND THEN ON THE PARCEL NEXT TO IT, WE HAVE THE OFFICE WITH THE PARKING GARAGE. HOPEFULLY WE GET SOMEBODY TO DO THAT. AND I GUESS THE BEAUTY OF IT'S GETTING IT DEVELOPED, GETTING SOMETHING DEVELOPED THERE, I GUESS, BUT HOPEFULLY NOT ALL APARTMENTS, BUT THE MISSION SAYS, I KNOW, WE KNOW WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT, BUT YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. THIS BRINGS US TO THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS A ZONING CHANGE IN CONCEPT PLAN FOR MILLER ROAD DEVELOPMENT. UH, THIS REQUEST IS TO CREATE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WITH DATA CENTER USE. IT'S ABOUT 157 ACRES IN OUR SOUTH SECTOR. YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW ON THE SCREEN, AND THEN THE STAR ON THE MAP SHOWING IT. IT'S AT THE VERY, UM, UH, SOUTHERN POINT OF THE CITY. UM, SO THE, TO GIVE YOU A, A LITTLE BIT OF, UH, UNDERSTANDING OF WHERE YOU ARE, UM, THE PRAIRIE RIDGE PROVIDENCE CAME THROUGH AND ZONED THIS AREA TO THEIR, UH, PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND SO THIS IS ADJACENT TO THAT. UH, THEIR CONCEPT PLAN DEPICTS SIX DATA CENTER BUILDINGS WITH A PROPOSED ELECTRIC SUBSTATION ACCESS WOULD BE OFF OF MILLER. THESE ARE THEIR CONCEPTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND THEN THEIR PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS ACCOMPLISHES A FEW THINGS. UH, FIRST IT ESTABLISHES LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AS THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY'S CURRENTLY IN THE CITY'S EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. THEY'RE PURSUING ANNEXATION. AND THIS WILL BE ON THE 14TH, JULY 14TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING. UH, THE ANNEXATION WILL BE HEARD FIRST FOLLOWED BY THE ZONING LATER ON IN THE, IN THE MEETING. UM, SO IT ALSO ADDS AND DEFINES A DATA CENTER AS A FACILITY USED TO HOUSE A COLLECTION OF COMPUTER SERVERS AND ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS FOR THE REMOTE STORAGE PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA FOR USE BY OFFSITE END USERS. UM, THEIR PROPOSED STANDARDS ARE, UM, IDENTICAL TO THE STANDARDS THAT WERE ADOPTED FOR THE PROVIDENCE GOODLAND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. UM, AND SO IT, UH, ADDRESSES THE BUILDING DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, SCREENING, PARKING, AND BUILDING HEIGHT. SO STAFFS GENERALLY RECEPTIVE OF THOSE STANDARDS. OUR CURRENT, UH, INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS AND APPENDIX X WAS WRITTEN INTENDED FOR THE TRADITIONAL OFFICE WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT. UM, AND SO THIS IS TAILORED MORE TOWARDS THE DATA CENTER USE. UH, WE DID RECEIVE, UM, FOUR LETTERS OF OPPOSITION REPRESENTING THREE UNIQUE ADDRESSES. AND THOSE PROPERTIES WERE, UM, TO THE EAST OFF OF MILLER ROAD. UM, WITH THAT, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. UH, CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING SHALL BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE USE FROM THE DATA CENTER AND SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? I GUESS WE'RE MOVING ON UP IN THE WORLD IN THE DATA CENTERS. THIS IS THE SECOND ONE, RIGHT? THIS WILL BE THE THIRD ZONING. ZONING FOR, UH, WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY SITE PLANS YET. THERE'S, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF NEEDS. SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S A GOOD SIGN. A QUESTION JUST FOR MY OWN EDIFICATION, WHY THE DIFFERENT TREATMENT FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY AND DATA CENTERS? SO THIS WAS THE PROPOSAL THAT THEY PUT FORWARD. UH, WE'VE SEEN INSTANCES WHERE IT'S CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING WITH, IT'S ALL KIND OF OUTSIDE, UH, NO BUILDING, UH, LESS SCREENING, LESS INVESTMENT IN THE PROPERTY. AND SO, UM, THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION THAT STAFF HAD FOR, I GUESS OUR, OUR SECOND ZONING CASE. CAN WE ALSO NOTED THE ASSOCIATED NOISE WITH CRYPTO MINING CRYPTOCURRENCY MONEY, WHICH AS YOU MENTIONED, A LOT OF IT IS OUTDOOR AND NOT ENC CLOSED. AND THEN THE LARGE SERVERS AND FANS GOING, UH, YOU PULL IT UP, YOU'LL SEE SOME COMPLAINTS. AND I THINK VENUS, NOT, NOT VENUS, UM, IT'S SOME NEIGHBORING COMMUNITY WHERE, UH, IT'S CAUSED SOME NOISE COMPLAINTS. SO, SO THE CRYPTO GUYS DON'T DO THEIR STUFF IN A CLIMATE CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT. ONES THAT WE'VE SEEN. SOME DON'T. WOW. OKAY. YEAH, YEAH. GREAT QUESTION. COMMISSIONER. SOMEONE IDENTIFIED RIGHT NOW? I DON'T BELIEVE SO, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE TONIGHT AND WILL BE ABLE TO, TO CONFIRM. CONFIRM. I THINK THAT'S IT, YOUR HONOR. ALRIGHT, THE NEXT TWO ITEMS ARE RELATED TO THE SAME PROJECT. UM, SO THE FIRST COMPONENT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, UM, TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LANE, USE MAP FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE SLASH DRAINAGE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. UM, SO YOU SHOULD ALSO BE FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROJECT. THEY'VE COME BEFORE, UH, YOU GUYS A FEW TIMES FOR THE ZONING. UH, THEY HAVE PURCHASED ADDITIONAL LAND ABOUT 719 ACRES. AND SO THIS IS TO, UH, CHANGE THE FLUME [00:30:01] TO MATCH WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. THE AREAS OUTLINED IN YELLOW ARE, UH, PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CASE AND REPRESENT THE NEW ACREAGE THAT THEY'VE PURCHASED. UM, SO THAT AREA'S, UH, PROPOSED FOR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AND IT COULD INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOMES AND SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINES, WHICH KIND OF FALL UNDER THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. UH, I WILL NOTE THAT, UH, 70% OF IT WILL BE SINGLE FAMILY, UH, DEVELOPMENT. UM, SO THIS BRINGS US TO ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, WHICH IS THE ZONING CHANGE IN CONCEPT PLAN. SO AGAIN, THIS IS TO INCORPORATE THE ADDITIONAL ACREAGES, UM, FOR THE PROPERTY. IT'S BEEN BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION A FEW TIMES. UH, SO THE EXISTING ZONING IS PD FOUR 60 AND AGRICULTURE, UH, THE PD KIND OF BREAKS DOWN INTO DIFFERENT, UH, DISTRICT AREAS WITH MIXED USE, URBAN RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL, AND THEN OPEN SPACE. AND IT'S ABOUT 19, UH, 1,920 ACRES. UH, SO THIS IS THEIR CONCEPT PLAN AND AGAIN, I, I IDENTIFIED THEIR KIND OF SUBDISTRICTS WITHIN THAT. UM, THESE ARE THEIR USE TYPES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN EACH OF THOSE. AGAIN, THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU TODAY IS TO ALLOW, UM, SOME MEDIUM, UH, RESIDENTIAL. UM, SO I'VE PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THAT. UH, THE OTHER, UH, SUBDISTRICTS AND AREAS THAT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE AREN'T CHANGING. AGAIN, THIS IS ADDING ADDITIONAL ACREAGE, BUT THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL WILL ALLOW THEM TO DEVELOP SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOMES, SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE AND SINGLE FAMILY SIX. UH, THE TABLE ON THE LEFT SUMMARIZES THEIR, UH, PERCENTAGES. UM, SO A MINIMUM OF THE LOTS IN THOSE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AREAS, UM, WILL BE 70% SINGLE FAMILY. AND AGAIN, THEY HAVE SOME OPTIONS TO, UH, DEVELOP SOME SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE AND SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOMES. BUT 100% OF THOSE LOTS COULD BE SINGLE FAMILY. AND THEN THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT SUMMARIZES, UH, THEIR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. AND AGAIN, THESE ARE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT YOU'VE SEEN KIND OF TWO TIMES BEFORE. THEY'RE NOT CHANGING THOSE. UH, I INCLUDED THEIR REPRESENTATIONAL ELEVATION. SO STARTING WITH THE 80 FOOT LOT INTO THE 70 FOOT LOT TO THE 55 AND 60, AND THEN THE 40 FOOT REAR ENTRY. UH, AND THEN THEIR TOWN HOMES AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. AGAIN, THIS IS A PART OF A, A MASTER PLANNED, UH, COMMUNITY. AND ON THE 17TH CITY COUNCIL DID, UH, AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO THEIR DEVELOPER AGREEMENT, WHICH IS IN PLACE AND ALLOWS 'EM TO DEVELOP AS THIS. SO THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. ANY QUESTIONS, PERMISSION? IT'S A BIG FANCY PROJECT. CAN YOU JUST GO BACK TO THAT ONE SLIDE THAT SHOWED THE, WAS THAT THE, UH, WAS THAT WHERE BARON? WHAT IS THAT? THAT'S SO BIG THERE. I CAN'T SEE IT. I CAN'T READ THAT. SO THAT IS JUST KIND OF SUMMARIZING. WITHIN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, THEY'VE GOT, AGAIN, TOWN HOMES, SINGLE FAMILY, ZERO LOT LINE AND SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. THIS SUMMARIZES THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO WHICH THEY COULD DEVELOP. AND THEN WITHIN THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, THEY CAN HAVE A VARIETY OF LOT WIDTHS STARTING AT 40. IT'S A GOOD CHART. IT'S JUST, I CAN'T SEE IT. YEAH, IT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET. OKAY. UM, BUT AGAIN, THESE ARE THE DEVELOPER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WERE, UH, AGREED TO AND EXECUTED BY THEIR DEVELOPER AGREEMENT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU. THAT BEING SAID, WE ARE DONE. LAST CASE, IT IS, UH, 6:06 PM AND WE'LL RECONVENE AT 6:30 PM THANK YOU. FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS? NO, JUST A NOTE FOUND, THE CITY IS GRANBURY. OH, GRANBURY, TEXAS. AND THE NON CLIMATE CONTROL. YES, THEY ARE NOISY. I JUST, I CAN'T IMAGINE THIS COMPUTERS WERE IN GRANDBURY AROUND A LONG TIME. WELL, THEY, THEY, UH, UM, FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THAT COMPANY. OH WOW. GREENBURY RESIDENTS DID. AND IT LOOKS LIKE THEY ERECTED A 24 FOOT TALL WALL NOISE WALL TO HELP. WOW. THAT WAS JUST DONE. WE WANNA AVOID ALL THAT. YES. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU FOR THAT. THAT BEING SAID, IT'S SIX OH WHAT STILL? 6, 6, 6 0 6. AND MEETING IS, UH, CONVENE. WE'LL RECONVENE AT 6:30 PM FOR THE, UH, PUBLIC HEARING. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.