[00:00:03]
WELCOME TO[Planning & Zoning Briefing 092324]
THE STAFF BRIEFING, THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 23RD, 2024.I'M CHERYL SMITH, CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THE STAFF BRIEFING THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY CO AT 5 35 30 3:00 PM THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS WHERE THE STAFF BRIEFS THE COMMISSION AND PREVIEWS.
THE CASES OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA COMMISSION MEMBERS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT MAY FACILITATE THE MEETING AND THE PRESENTATION OF THE CASES.
NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN DURING THE BRIEFING.
PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACE AT THE REGULAR MEETING, WHICH WILL BEGIN EARLIER THAN 6:30 PM I'LL NOW CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL OF THE MEMBERS TO CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AFTER I CALL YOUR NAME, PLEASE STAY HERE.
LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT EXCEPT FOR TY CHAPMAN.
FRANK AND FRANK GONZALES, ARE THERE ANYTHING ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION? NO, MA'AM.
HOW ARE YOU? GOOD, HOW ARE YOU? I'M PRETTY GOOD.
THIS IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
IT IS A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS LOCATED OFF 1 61 BETWEEN MAYFIELD AND FORUM.
THIS IS ZONE PD 3 9 7 AND IT IS ON 11.01 ACRE LOT.
SO JUST SOME BRIEF UH, HISTORY ON THIS AREA.
SO IN OCTOBER 15TH, 2019, CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE THAT PD ZONING CHANGE CONCEPT PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY USES.
SO RIGHT NOW, IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, YOU KNOW THOSE TOWN HOMES ARE ALREADY BEING BUILT, UH, THE PARCEL DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT THOSE ARE ALREADY BUILT AS WELL.
SO THAT WAS A SITE PLAN APPROVED IN 2020 BY THE SAME COMPANY CALERA FOR THE FOUNDRY PHASE ONE.
SO THIS IS THE FOUNDRY PHASE TWO, AND THEN THOSE UNDEVELOPED LOGS ALONG 1 61 ARE GOING TO BE FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL.
I DO WANNA NOTE ABOUT THIS OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN.
THE GOAL AT THE TIME, THE VISION FOR COUNCIL WAS WALKABILITY.
SO THE GOAL WAS THE RESIDENTS AND THE TOWN HOMES AND MULTIFAMILY COULD WALK TO THOSE COMMERCIAL RETAIL.
SO IT IS 334 UNITS AMONG FOUR DIFFERENT APARTMENT BUILDINGS.
THEY ALSO HAVE A CLUBHOUSE AS WELL.
IT IS MEETING OUR DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ALONG WITH OUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
THIS IS THE AMENITY PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
SO THOSE BLUE SQUARES IN THE MIDDLE OF THOSE ARE AS FOLLOWS FROM LEFT TO RIGHT.
SO POOL, COURTYARD, GAMING COURTYARD, RELAXATION, COURTYARD, LOUNGE, COURTYARD, AND A DOG PARK ON THE FAR RIGHT.
SO EACH ONE OF THOSE APARTMENT BUILDINGS IS GONNA HAVE SOME KIND OF COURTYARD JUST LIKE THE FOUNDRY PHASE ONE TO THE SOUTH.
SO THIS WAS THE LANDSCAPE THAT WAS PROVIDED.
IT IS MEETING MOST OF OUR LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS.
THEY ARE REQUESTING A FEW VARIANCES FOR SCREENING, BUT I'LL TOUCH BASE ON THOSE TOWARDS THE END.
SO THESE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.
SO THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO OUR APPENDIX W REQUIREMENTS, WHICH THEY ARE MEETINGS.
THEY'RE GIVING US A MIX OF DIFFERENT, UH, MAINSTREAM MATERIALS, A MIX OF COLORS AND CONTRASTING, UM, TEXTURES ON THE BUILDING.
THEY'RE GIVING US VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION.
THEY HAVE THE RECESS BALCONIES, SO THESE ARE JUST TWO, BUT THERE ARE ABOUT SIX DIFFERENT PAGES OF ELEVATIONS IN THE PACKET.
THE APPLICANT DID PROVIDE US RENDERINGS.
SO YOU CAN SEE HERE TO GIVE YOU A BETTER IDEA OF WHAT IT'LL LOOK LIKE WHEN IT'S ACTUALLY BUILT OUT.
SO YOU'LL SEE THAT IT IS SIMILAR TO THE FOUNDRY PHASE ONE FACADES, BUT THEY DID WANNA DIFFERENTIATE IT A LITTLE BIT.
SO AGAIN, THIS IS SUBJECT TO OUR APPENDIX W STANDARDS.
SO THEY DID HAVE TO PROVIDE US THIS CHECKLIST BECAUSE THEY ARE MEETING THE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS OF APPENDIX W.
THEY ONLY HAD TO PROVIDE ELEMENTS FROM TWO OF THE THREE CATEGORIES, AND THEY CHOSE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY BUILDING MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, OR OTHER FEATURES AND HIGH QUALITY FEATURES OR DESIGNS.
THEY'RE MEETING THE APPENDIX W CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS.
SO AS I STATED, THEY ARE REQUIRING SOME VARIANCES.
SO THEY'RE REQUIRING A VARIANCE FOR THE PERIMETER FENCE AND GATED ENTRY.
SO APPENDIX W DOES REQUIRE THAT MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS CONTAIN SECURITY GATES AT ALL ENTRANCES TO THE COMPLEX.
THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT INCLUDE SECURITY GATES.
IT DOES REQUIRE SCREENING FENCES ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
SO ARTICLE A DOES REQUIRE THAT ALL MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS PROVIDE A MASONRY SCREENING WALL ON PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ZONE FOR SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL USE, WHICH AGAIN, THAT PROPERTY OF THE WEST IS ALL TOWN HOMES AND THEY'RE NOT INCLUDING MASONRY SCREENING WALLS HERE.
AND LASTLY, THEY ARE REQUIRING A VARIANCE FOR A SCREENING FENCE ADJACENT TO NON-RESIDENTIAL.
SO AGAIN, ARTICLE EIGHT DOES REQUIRE A RAW IRON FENCE ON PROPERTY LINES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH WILL BE THOSE EASTERN LOTS.
BUT AGAIN, STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH THESE VARIANCES 'CAUSE AGAIN, THIS OVERALL PD WAS MEANT FOR WALKABILITY.
SO WE WANT RESIDENTS FROM TOWN HOMES AND MULTIFAMILIES.
WE WANNA WALK TO AND FRO THAT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL THAT'S GONNA DEVELOP ALONG 1 61.
SO THE DRC HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL STAFF NOTES THAT THE PRIOR PHASE OF THIS MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT
[00:05:01]
RECEIVED THE REQUESTED VARIANCES AS PART OF THE APPROVAL CONCLUDE STAFF PRESENTATION.I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
WELL, THAT WAS A RECORD, BRITTANY, I DO BELIEVE
ANY QUESTIONS WITH THAT ONE? UM, I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT, UH, WHAT DID I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT? UM, THE ELEPHANT AND THIS, IT'S SO HIGH.
IS THAT FOUR STORIES? THE TOWN TO THREE STORIES? I BELIEVE THERE ARE FOUR STORIES.
YEAH, BECAUSE I'M WONDERING BEFORE, DID WE ASK A QUESTION ABOUT THE, THE RESIDENTIAL NEAR? IS IT, UH, YOU'RE NOT GONNA BE LOOKING INTO ANYBODY'S HOMES? ARE THERE, UM, I'M, UH, I'LL, I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK ONTO THAT.
SO, BUT AGAIN, THIS WAS AN OVERALL MASTER PLAN KIND OF AREA, SO, RIGHT.
I WAS JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THAT BECAUSE IT IS RIGHT BEHIND WHICH THERE IS, IF YOU LOOK, AND I WANNA GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN.
IF YOU LOOK HERE, THERE IS SOME SEPARATION THAT DO HAVE THAT DRIVE AISLE THERE IN BETWEEN THIS AND THE TOWN HOMES.
AND THEY DO HAVE THE PARKING IN BETWEEN AS WELL AS A TRAIL.
SO THERE IS SOME GOOD SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TOWN HOME AND THE MULTIFAMILY BACK THERE.
I'D BE CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT THAT, THE EXACT PROXIMITY IS TO THAT.
BUT I THINK OTHER THAN THAT, I'M JUST WONDERING IF THERE WERE ANY, ANY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE HOMEOWNERS IN THE AREA.
SO I WOULD, THAT WOULD BE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT, WHICH THEY'LL BE HERE TONIGHT.
ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION.
COMMISSIONER FOR BRITTANY, CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE OAK USE LINE TO THE LOCATION MAP? NO, NO.
WHERE ARE THE TOWN HOMES? SO THIS IS THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN, BUT THE TOWN HOMES ARE PLANNED NORTH.
SO ALL OF THOSE ARE THE TOWN HOMES.
SO THIS IS THE TOWN HOME PORTION THAT'S ALREADY BEING BUILT OUT THERE.
THIS IS THE MULTIFAMILY, THIS IS WHERE THE MULTIFAMILY IS THAT IS EXISTING.
SO THE FOUNDRY PHASE ONE, THIS IS WHERE THE FOUNDRY PHASE TWO.
AND THIS, THIS SITE PLAN IS LARGELY IN ALIGNMENT, IS THE DEVELOPER OF THE TOWN HOMES, THE OWNER OF FOUNDRY ONE AND FOUNDRY TWO.
SO THE DEVELOP, UH, ACTUALLY I'M NOT CERTAIN ABOUT THAT.
SO THESE TOWN HOMES ARE CH YES.
THE TOWN HOMES ARE BEING DEVELOPED BY CB.
IT'S NOT THE DEVELOPER OF FOUNDRY ONE, TWO.
AND THEN THE, I THINK THE FOUNDRY IS DIRECTLY MULTIFAMILY, BUT I'M JUST SAYING FROM ABOVE, IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ALMOST LIKE IT'S INTEGRATED CONCEPT.
IT DOES, IT CAME, THAT'S WHY I WAS WONDERING.
IT LOOKS GOOD IS THE MASTER DEVELOPER AND THEN THEY HAVE THE CP JENNY, WHICH DOESN'T TOWN HOMES.
AND THEN THE, UH, COMPANY THAT WITH THE MULTIFAMILY.
SO THE TOWNHOME DEVELOPER IS AWARE OF ALL THE MULTIFAMILY AND THE WHOLE PROJECT IN A WHOLE, AND THE MASTER DEVELOPER PUT 'EM TOGETHER ANYWAYS, IT SOUNDS LIKE? YES.
SO THEY'RE GONNA HAVE SEPARATE, UH, HOAS OR THERE'S GONNA BE ONE.
SO, SO TOWN HOMES, SO ARE THEY ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN HOA, BUT THE APARTMENT BUILDING WILL HAVE THERE A SEPARATE ENTITY.
THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO YES, THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.
IT LOOKS VERY NICE FROM THE OUTSET.
THAT WE'LL HEAD ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE.
THIS IS A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR FLEXING GATE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
SO THIS IS AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 2150 WEST BARDEN ROAD.
SO IT'S ON THAT NORTHWEST CORNER OF BARDEN AND MATTHEW.
SO IN PD 3 72, AND IT'S ON A 28.38 ACRE LOT.
SO Y'ALL PROBABLY FAMILIAR WITH FLEXING GATE.
SO IT'S AN EXISTING 430,000 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE.
SO THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT THEY'RE COMING THROUGH FOR TODAY IS THEY'RE WANTING TO ADD A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
SO THIS IS THE OVERALL SITE PLAN, BUT THIS ONE YOU CAN SEE A LITTLE CLOSER OR MORE DETAIL.
SO THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE'S GONNA GO IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER OF THE SITE PLAN, WHICH IS RIGHT UP TOWARD, ALONG THAT CORNER OF BARDEN AND MATTHEW.
SO THE POINT OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, IF Y'ALL REMEMBER, THEY CAME THROUGH FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE SUP LAST YEAR IT WAS DENIED.
SO NOW THEY'VE BEEN WORKING TOWARDS ELIMINATING ALL THAT OUTSIDE STORAGE OUTSIDE.
SO THEY'VE WORKED WITH, UM, THEIR OPERATIONS AND THEY'RE GOING TO FURTHER REDUCE ALL OF THEIR OUTSIDE STORAGE NEEDS TO BASICALLY BE ABLE TO FIT INTO JUST THIS BUILDING.
SO THIS BUILDING IS GONNA ALLOW THEM TO REMOVE ALL THEIR OUTSIDE STORAGE ON SITE.
SO THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS MEETING OUR DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
IT'S JUST GONNA BE METAL WITH STILL BEAMS. SO THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS I WANNA INCLUDE THE SOUTHERN ELEVATION, THE NORTHERN ELEVATION.
YOU CAN SEE THE SOUTHERN ELEVATION WILL JUST BE THE METAL.
THAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO FACE BARDON.
BUT THE NORTH ELEVATION IS GOING TO BE OPEN AND THAT'S GOING TO FACE THE PRIMARY BUILDING.
SO THIS DOES REQUIRE A VARIANCE.
THIS SITE IS SUBJECT TO OUR APPENDIX X ARTICLE OR APPENDIX X.
UM, SO IT IS GOING TO REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR THE BUILDING MATERIAL FOR THIS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
SO APPENDIX X DOES REQUIRE THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREETS SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE PRIMARY FACADE.
SO THE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS DO NOT MEET THE STANDARDS OF A PRIMARY FACADE, WHICH REQUIRES MASONRY CONSTRUCTION AND THREE DESIGN ELEMENTS SUCH AS ACCENT MATERIALS, PROJECTING, CORNES AND ARTICULATION.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW METAL STRUCTURE WITH STEEL BEAMS. SO ESSENTIALLY, BECAUSE THIS IS IN AN APPENDIX, APPENDIX X PROJECT, IT'S SUPPOSED TO MEET THAT SAME PRIMARY FACADE STANDARDS.
AND THIS IS JUST GONNA BE A VERY SIMPLE METAL BUILDING.
SO THEY'RE REQUESTING VARIANCES FOR THOSE BUILDING MATERIALS.
SO WHILE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE DOES NOT MEET APPENDIX X STANDARDS, IT WILL ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO ENCLOSE THE EXISTING OUTSIDE STORAGE AND BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
POST ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 180 FEET
[00:10:01]
FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY AND WILL BE SCREENED BY EXISTING LANDSCAPING ON SITE.THAT CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
SO IF I, IF I'M READING THIS RIGHT, THE HISTORY ON THIS, UM, IN NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR, CITY COUNCIL VOTED AGAINST THIS AND DENIED OUTSIDE STORAGE.
YET THEY CONTINUE TO HAVE OUTSIDE STORAGE.
SO THEY HAVE HAD OUTSIDE STORAGE, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING, WE'VE BEEN WORKING TOWARDS GETTING THEM AND WENT INTO COMPLIANCE.
SO THIS WILL BE THAT FINAL STEP TO HELP 'EM GET INTO COMPLIANCE.
AND FROM MY, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, SO THE BUILDING IS MORE THAN 430,000 SQUARE FEET, THE PRIMARY BUILDING, RIGHT? MM-HMM
AND THIS ADDITION IS LESS THAN 2% OF THAT IN SIZE.
UM, IF YOU LOOK AT GOOGLE OVERHEAD VIEW, AND IF YOU DRIVE BY AND SEE WHAT THEY'VE GOT, I DON'T THINK THAT WHAT'S OUTSIDE WILL FIT IN A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT SPOT.
AND I JUST AM SAYING THAT FOR MY OTHER COMMISSIONERS.
UM, IT'S INTERESTING TO ME THAT 10 MONTHS LATER, THIS IS BROUGHT BEFORE US TO PROVIDE SOME VERY LITTLE BIT OF STORAGE FOR SOMEBODY THAT HAS CONTINUED TO BREAK THE RULE FOR 10 MONTHS.
THAT'S ALL I, SO MY UNDERSTANDING FROM THE APPLICANT WE SPOKE THIS LAST WEEK, IS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO, THEY'VE CHANGED OPERATIONS COM BASICALLY REDUCED THEIR NEED FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE TO THE POINT WHERE IT WILL FIT IN THIS, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL BE HERE TONIGHT, CAN SPEAK ON THAT MORE.
ONE THING I DO WANNA ASK BRITTANY WAS I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT.
HOW MANY CALLS HAVE THEY HAD? AND, UH, WE HAVE SOME PAPER TRAIL ON THE, UH, FREQUENCY OF THE, UH, CONCERNS.
SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE OUR CODE COMPLIANCE MANAGER HERE TO ANSWER ANY CODE QUESTIONS RIGHT HERE.
I'M THE CODE COMPLIANCE MANAGER.
UH, I, I CAN GET YOU THAT NUMBER OF CALLS.
UM, I CAN'T TELL YOU WE'VE ISSUED A CITATION MM-HMM
UM, BEFORE WE KIND OF MET WITH THEM AND, AND STARTED WORKING ON A GAME PLAN.
RIGHT NOW WE'RE HOLDING OFF ON ENFORCEMENT.
UH, WE HAVEN'T DISMISSED THE CITATION.
UH, WE RE WE'VE RESET IT FOR A LATER DATE TO SEE IF WE CAN GET THEM INTO COMPLIANCE.
I THINK BIG PICTURE FROM WHAT MY UNDERSTANDING IS, IS THAT, UM, THERE, THE NOISE, YOU KNOW, AND UNLESS THEY'RE GONNA CHANGE THEIR OPERATION HOURS BECAUSE THE NOISE AFTER A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME IS NOT VERY HELPFUL FOR HOMEOWNERS, THEY'RE TRYING TO FINISH OUT THEIR DAY.
SO, BUT THAT WAS PART OF IT, RIGHT? FROM MY UNDERSTANDING IN TALKING TO MY COUNSELOR, UM, COUNCILMAN LOPEZ? YES, MA'AM.
UM, AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS HERE.
IF THEY CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEY FOUND ANY, UH, DECAL LEVELS THAT EXCEED THE NOISE.
I, I BELIEVE THEY, THE DECAL, THE DECAL WOULD BE ONE THING, BUT JUST THE OBSERVATION OF IT BEING ANNOYING TO THE HOMEOWNERS THAT ARE ALREADY THERE.
IT'D STILL BE A CONCERN, YOU KNOW, IF THERE ARE LIGHTS OR THERE ARE LOTS OF TRUCKS MOVING AROUND OR WHATEVER.
JUST ANYTHING OUT OF THE ORDINARY COULD BE A CONCERN, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW.
SO COMMISSIONERS WITH THIS ITEM, YOU'RE JUST CONSIDERING THE ADDITION OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MM-HMM
AND WHETHER THAT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE PLAN OR NOT.
UM, UNFORTUNATELY WITH THIS TYPE OF APPLICATION CHANGING ANY CONDITIONS OF THE USES O OTHER THAN ALLOWING THAT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS NOT ALL, WELL, LIKE THE COMMISSIONER MATT SAID, IT IS A CONCERN IF THEY'RE NOT EVEN COMPLIANT WITH THAT, WHY SHOULD LEGAL, YOU KNOW, HAVE THE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURE? YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOT COMPLYING WITH THAT.
THEY'RE NOT EVEN, EVEN WITH REGARD TO THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, THEY WANT VARIANCES TO THAT ANYMORE TO PUT THE ADDITIONAL, WHATEVER IT IS, MASONARY TO, UH, FINISH IT OFF.
THAT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE IT WOULD BE THAT EXPENSIVE, I GUESS.
WELL, TO JULIE'S POINT, THAT WOULD BE YOUR PURVIEW MM-HMM
BUT WITH REGARD TO THE NOISE, I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR CITY CODE.
THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT.
SO YES, IF YOU WANT TO USE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO TRY TO ADDRESS SOME THINGS WITH REGARD TO THE VARIANCES, YOU CAN, BUT THE, THE NOISE IS A SEPARATE MATTER.
AND I'M JUST, YOU KNOW, SPEAKING TO THE, THE FACT OF THE CONCERNS OF THE I UNDERSTAND.
AND THE APPLICANT HAS HEARD IT AS WELL.
SO I THINK THEY MAY HAVE SOME INPUT IN REGARDS TO THEIR OPERATIONS THAT MAY BE ABLE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THIS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, MS. BRITTANY.
THE NEXT ITEM IS IN ITEM NUMBER FOUR.
THIS IS A SUP REQUEST FOR A ANOTHER, UH, SELF, SELF-SERVICE, UH, LAUNDROMAT.
THEY'LL BE LOCATED, UM, RIGHT TO THE EAST OF THE EXISTING KROGER ON EAST PIONEER.
THIS KIND OF SHOWS GENERALLY THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED, UH, BUSINESS.
[00:15:01]
THEY WILL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE A 38, UH, 50 SQUARE FOOT SELF-SERVE, UH, LAUNDROMAT.THEY PLAN TO HAVE SOMEWHERE FROM 30 TO 40, UH, WASHERS AND DRYERS LIKE AROUND 30 TO 40 EACH.
UM, THEY'LL HAVE VENDING MACHINES, OF COURSE FOR DETERGENTS AND SODAS AND SNACKS.
THEY WILL HAVE A LOBBY WITH SITTING AREA AND TV AND CHILDREN'S, UH, BOOKCASES AND SOME GAME STATIONS.
THEY WILL BE OPERATING FROM 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PM UH, THEY'LL HAVE ONE EMPLOYEE DURING THE BUSINESS HOURS.
THEY WILL HAVE TWO TO THREE EMPLOYEES DURING THE WEEKENDS.
DURING THE PEAK HOURS, THEY WILL INSTALL MULTIPLE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS.
AGAIN, THIS IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST FOR A SUPPOSED TO BE USED PERMIT.
UM, THIS CONCLUDES THAT PRESENTATION.
IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? ANY QUESTIONS? THAT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.
WELL, I GUESS THAT IS IT FOR OUR, UH, PRESENTATIONS.
THIS BRIEFING IS, UH, IN, HAS ENDED.
AND, UM, WE'LL RECONVENE AT SIX 30 FOR THE HEARING.