Apr 24, 2023 Planning & Zoning 042423

WE READY

[00:00:01]

FIVE 30.

IT'S FIVE 30.

MM-HMM .

WELCOME TO THE

[Planning and Zoning Staff Briefing]

I'M CHERYL SMITH, CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THIS STAFF BRIEFING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING IS HEREBY CALLED TO ORDER AT 5:31 PM THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS WHERE THE STAFF BRIEFS THE COMMISSION AND PREVIEWS THE CASES ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

COMMISSION MEMBERS WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT MAY FACILITATE THE MEETING AND THE PRESENTATION OF THE CASES.

NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN DURING THE BRIEFING.

PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACE DURING THE REGULAR MEETING, WHICH WILL BEGIN NO EARLIER THAN 6:30 PM I'LL NOW CONDUCT A ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS TO CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM.

AFTER I CALL YOUR NAME, PLEASE SAY, HERE.

CHERYL SMITH.

HERE.

MAX COLEMAN.

HERE.

ANNA COCA.

HERE.

CALL RAMIREZ.

FRANK GONZALEZ.

JOHN FKO.

HERE.

MICHELLE MADDEN.

JULIA PEREZ HERE.

AND QUENTIN, PETE, LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT EXCEPT FOR CARL RAMIREZ, FRANK GONZALEZ, MICHELLE MADDEN, AND QUENTIN.

PETE.

COMMISSIONERS, PLEASE REMEMBER TO TURN ON YOUR MICROPHONE BEFORE YOU SPEAK TO ENSURE THAT EVERYONE CAN HEAR YOU.

ARE THERE ANY ITEMS WHICH WE NEED TO DISCUSS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TODAY? NO, MA'AM.

OKAY.

STAFF, IS THERE ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA YOU'D LIKE TO PRESENT? YES, MA'AM.

HELLO, MS. JUNE.

HELLO, GOOD EVENING.

BOARD, UH, COMMISSIONERS.

SO THE FIRST ITEM, UM, THE ITEM NUMBER SIX ON THE AGENDA IS FOR A SITE PLAN.

THIS IS FOR A MA MASONRY F FOUR ONE 4G STREET.

SO THE EXISTING LOCATION IS JUST SHOWN.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4 0 4.

THEY ARE TRYING TO PROPOSE A INDOOR CONTRACTOR SHOP OF 4,000 SQUARE FEET BUILDING WITH NO OUTSIDE STORAGE OR DISPLAY.

SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY ARE PROPOSING A CONTRACTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHOP, WHERE, UM, ALL THEIR EQUIPMENT AND, AND EVERYTHING WILL BE STORED INSIDE.

UM, AS I HAD MENTIONED, THE ZONING DOES NOT ALLOW ANY OUTSIDE STORAGE.

SO THEY'RE NOT PROPOSING ANY, UH, THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PARKING STAFF.

DOES NOT OPPOSE THIS REQUEST, BUT I'LL GO COVER THAT MORE IN DETAIL IN THE LATER PAGES.

SO HERE'S THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN.

THEY DID PROVIDE TWO STREET TREES AND HAVE MET THE REQUIREMENT, AND HERE ARE THE ELEVATIONS.

THE FRONT ELEVATION IS THE ONE THAT YOU WILL BE SEEING FROM THE JUST STREET WHERE THEY HAVE THE ENTRANCE TO THE OFFICE AREA, AND THEY HAVE A ROLLUP DOOR WHERE THEY CAN EASILY, UM, LOAD AND UNLOAD MATERIALS INTO THE BUILDING.

AS I HAD MENTIONED, THE APPLICA, UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING ONE VARIANCE FOR THE PARKING.

THEY'RE ASKING TO ALLOW TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM PARKING FROM FIVE REQUIRED SPACE TO THREE PARKING SPACES.

SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS FAIRLY LIMITED.

AND I JUST WANNA MENTION THAT THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA ARE A LITTLE BIT OLDER.

BUILDINGS THAT ARE COMPLETELY IN THE MEADOW BUILDINGS THAT ARE USUALLY BUILT UP FOR THE ENTIRE LOT WITH MEANING THAT THEY DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING SETBACK OR, UM, LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OR PARKING REQUIREMENT OF TODAY.

SO WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING ACTUALLY IS AN IMPROVEMENT TO WHAT IS BEING, UH, WHAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED THERE.

SO STAFF DOES NOT OPPOSE THIS REQUEST.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STEPH? ANY QUESTIONS? I JUST HAD ONE.

YES, MA'AM.

ON THE MASONRY, WHAT IS THAT? ARE THEY MAKING, UH, BRICKS, OR WHAT ARE THEY MAKING? IT'S SPLIT FACE CMU BLOCKS.

SO IT'S A CONCRETE BLOCKS THAT'S PORTED AND THAT'S KIND OF STACKED ONE BY ONE.

MM-HMM .

MM-HMM .

SO DOES THAT REQUIRE A LOT OF STEAM OR KIND OF ANY KIND OF COMBUSTION OR ANYTHING THAT'S GONNA BE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD? IS IS IT ALL INDUSTRIAL OVER THERE? IT'S ALL METAL WAREHOUSES IN THAT AREA.

CURRENTLY, THE LOP ACTUALLY HAVE A SMALL RESIDENCE THERE, BUT THEY PLAN ON TEARING THAT DOWN AND BUILDING A NEW HOUSE.

YOU CAN KIND OF SEE FROM THIS PICTURE THAT A LOT OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS HAVE THE FLAT ROOF TOWARDS, OR THE, ALL THE MIDDLE WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS.

OKAY.

YES, MA'AM.

YES.

WEREN'T WE HAVING SOME ISSUES ON TRUCK TRAFFIC DOWN THAT WAY? NOT TOO LONG AGO.

GOING TO, UH, THE WAREHOUSES DOWN THERE, UH, EAST OF MACARTHUR, EAST OF MACARTHUR.

AM I LOOKING AT THAT RIGHT? MAYBE I'M NOT LOOKING AT THAT.

RIGHT.

THAT'S ON THE WEST SIDE.

OH, OKAY.

YEAH.

I'M SORRY.

YES.

IT'S WEST OF 1 61.

THIS IS KIND OF SOUTH OF THE JEFFERSON AND THE RAILROAD TRACK.

I GOTCHA.

YES.

THANK YOU.

YES.

MM-HMM .

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? I GUESS THAT'S IT.

THANK YOU.

YOU READY FOR THE NEXT ONE?

[00:05:01]

THE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS ANOTHER SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR COMMISSARY AT ONE 30 LAKEVIEW DRIVE.

SO THE PROPOSED, UH, PROPOSED LOCATION IS RIGHT HERE.

SO THIS IS A SITE PLAN FOR A COMMISSARY THAT'S ABOUT 2 2200 SQUARE FEET.

UM, THEY ARE IN THE PD 3 49 A, WHICH ACTUALLY DOES ALLOW THE PER, UH, REQUESTED USE OF COMMISSARY BY.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

SO THIS IS KIND OF THE, UH, SITE PLAN LAYOUT AND THE, UM, ENTIRE FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT.

YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY HAVE A COOKING AREA, VEGETABLE PREP AREA, AND JUST WALK-IN REFRIGERATORS IN THE BACK.

OH, SORRY.

SO THEY ARE MEETING OUR PARKING REQUIREMENT.

THEY'RE COMPLYING WITH OUR INTENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

THEY ARE PRO, UH, PROVIDING THE TWO TREES ALONG THE STREET AND MEETING THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT AS SHOWN.

SO THE COLOR IS KIND OF ADDED BY ME, JUST SO THAT YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE LINES A LITTLE BIT BETTER.

BUT THEY ARE PROPOSING STUCCO, WHICH IS ALLOWED, AND THEY DO HAVE A STOREFRONT TYPE OF GLASSES AT THE FRONT ENTRY.

AND THE AREAS KIND OF WHERE THEY HAVE THE OPEN WORKING AREAS, THOSE ARE THE STOREFRONT GLAZING THAT IS, ARE SHOWN THAT MATCHES THAT.

OTHER THAN THAT, IT'S JUST MAINLY STUCCO BUILDING.

BUT AS YOU CAN TELL, THE BUILDING IS FAIRLY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE REAR.

SO WHERE IT'S VISIBLE FROM THE STREET, FROM THE FRONT AND FROM THE SIDE, THEY DO ACTUALLY HAVE NICE STOREFRONT, UH, GL GLAZING WITH SOME AWNINGS, METAL CANOPIES OVER THAT.

UH, OKAY.

THIS IS A CONDITION FOR THE APPROVAL, WHICH I'LL GO OVER IT IN DETAIL A LITTLE BIT LATER.

SO THEY ARE NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES.

THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH ONE OF THE CON CONDITIONS.

SO CURRENTLY I JUST WANNA GO BACK TO THE LOCATION MAP.

SO THIS, UM, PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP.

UM, AND WHEN THIS PROPERTY DEVELOPED, A NEIGHBOR PROVIDED ADAM SO ENCLOSURE.

SO WITH THE APPLICANT HAVING SUCH A LIMITED LAND, IT WAS HARD TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE THAT CAN, THAT A WASTE TRUCK CAN ACTUALLY ACCESS AND BACK OUT.

SO OUR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES STAFF MET WITH THE APPLICANT'S DESIGNER, THE ARCHITECT, AND THEY WORKED OUT A PLAN THAT WOULD WORK BEST FOR THE ENTIRE AREA, WHICH WAS TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER ON THIS SITE TO BE SHARED BY ALL, UH, TENANTS IN THAT AREA.

SO WITH THAT, UH, STEPH IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, AND A SHARED DUMPSTER AGREEMENT SHALL BE FILED PRIOR TO CO.

THIS WILL GUARANTEE IN THE FUTURE IF THESE LOTS WERE SOLD TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE OR DIFFERENT ENTITIES, IT WILL STILL GIVE, UH, ACCESS TO THE COMMISSARY USER.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

UM, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF COMMISSIONERS? COMMISSIONER PEREZ? I HAVE A QUESTION.

ARE THEY ALSO SHARING PARKING? NO.

THE PROPERTY, UH, RIGHT NOW AS PROPOSED, THEY ARE MEETING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.

THEY DO ABOUT FIVE PARKING SPILLS.

THEY'RE JUST ALL IN THE BACK.

YES, MA'AM.

MM-HMM .

COMMISSIONERS.

ANY QUESTIONS? I JUST HAVE YOU GOT ONE? GO AHEAD.

YES, COMMISSIONER.

WHY, WHY IS THAT, UH, UH, THE FILING WITH THE COUNTY FOR THE DUMPSTER? YES.

THROUGH CITY.

CITY.

SO, UM, ANY LEGAL, UM, LIKE A DEED OR ANY PRI PRIVATE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO ENTITIES, CITY DOES NOT REALLY GET INVOLVED IN THOSE CIVIL AGREEMENTS.

IT'S BEST THAT THEY GET FILED AT THE, UH, COUNTY RECORDS, JUST LIKE OTHER PROPERTY RECORDS LIKE THE DEEDS OR SHARED AGREEMENT DEED OR RESTRICTIONS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

YES.

MM-HMM.

I THINK THIS IS A GOOD DEAL.

I JUST DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU COULD DO THAT.

MM-HMM .

SO, YEAH.

YEAH.

OKAY.

YES, WE CAN MAKE THAT A CONDITION.

YES, SIR.

MM-HMM .

I JUST HAD ONE QUESTION.

YES, MA'AM.

WHEN YOU SAY COMMISSARY? YES.

SO THAT'S GONNA BE JUST FOR THEIR, UH, STAFF.

ARE THEY GONNA BE SHARING WITH O WITH OTHER FOLKS IN THE AREA? RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST TO SERVE THEIR BUSINESS.

WE HAVE ASKED THAT QUESTION DURING THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING TO SEE IF IT WORKS GONNA BE MORE OF A COMMERCIAL KITCHEN FOR RENTING AND OTHER THINGS KNOW THEY SAY JUST FOR THEIR BUSINESS.

RIGHT.

SO THAT WOULD BE LIKE, UH, ANY ISSUE LIKE A RESTAURANT? YES.

IT WOULD BE DEFINITELY DIFFERENT CATEGORY OF USES WHEN THEY PROPOSE THAT THIS IS JUST FOR, TO SERVE THEIR SERVICE.

YEAH.

YES.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I THINK THAT'S IT ON THAT ONE.

THANK YOU, MS. SAVANNAH.

ALL RIGHTY.

THIS NEXT ITEM SHOULD LOOK A LITTLE FAMILIAR.

MM-HMM .

THE ZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN WAS APPROVED FAIRLY RECENTLY.

SO THIS IS A SITE PLAN FOR BIG SHOTS, GOLF, ENTERTAINMENT.

IT'S AN AMUSEMENT SERVICES, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR FACILITY.

IT'S LOCATED OFF OF IKEA PLACE, AND IT'S WITHIN OUR 1 61 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT.

ON THE SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

UH, THEY'VE GOT A TWO STORY BUILDING, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY THE, THE GOLF FIELD AREA.

UH, SO IT'S

[00:10:01]

THEY DO HAVE A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT AND INDOOR PUTTING, UH, THEY ARE, UH, PROPOSING TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPING, WHICH MEETS OUR REQUIREMENTS.

UH, THEY'RE MEETING THE DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.

I DO WANNA POINT OUT THAT, UH, THE PROPOSED LOCATION DOES NOT INCLUDE THIS IKEA WAY EXTENSION, BUT AS THE REST OF THE, THE AREA YOU CAN SEE, UH, ALL THIS LAND IS VACANT, IS DEVELOPED.

UH, STAFF DOES EXPECT THAT THIS, UH, WILL BE EXTENDED AND TIE INTO THE ROAD TO THE SOUTH.

UH, THESE ARE THEIR PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS.

YOU CAN SEE A GLASS CURTAIN WALL.

IT CREATES KIND OF AN ARTICULATED ENTRANCE.

UH, THEY'RE MEETING ALL OF THE APPENDIX F OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS.

THESE ARE THEIR BUILDING ELEVATIONS, AND THEN THEY'RE MEETING ALL OF OUR MENU ITEM REQUIREMENTS.

WE SAY YOU HAVE TO HAVE 12.

THERE'S, THEY'VE SELECTED 13.5.

THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PARKING SPACES BY FOUR SPACES.

THAT'S PRETTY MINIMAL.

UH, STAFF DOESN'T OBJECT TO THIS.

WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH A CONDITION, AND THAT'S THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DETENTION TO MAKE SURE THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE FLOW RATE, THE RECEIVING CREEK.

UNDER PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, THE DETENTION MAY BE LOCATED ON SITE OR OFFSITE.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A TIMING STUDY TO PROVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO DOWNSTREAM NEIGHBORS FACILITIES OR RECEIVING CREEKS AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 15 OF THE UDC, AND THEN THE CITY'S DRAINAGE AND DESIGN MANUAL VOLUME ONE.

SO THESE, UH, WOULD BE A PART OF THE ENGINEERING CIVIL PLAN REVIEW, BUT STAFF DID WANNA MAKE A NOTE OF THAT.

UM, SINCE I, IF ONSITE DETENTION IS REQUIRED, THAT COULD, UH, REQUIRE SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THEIR SITE PLAN.

WITH THAT, I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, YOUR HONOR.

ANY QUESTIONS? CAN YOU GO OVER IT ONE MORE TIME ABOUT THE, UM, THE, THE, THE ENTRANCE? YOU SAID SOMETHING, YOU SAID IT PRETTY QUICK, SO I DIDN'T CATCH THAT.

SURE.

LET ME FLIP BACK TO THE MAP.

SO THE ENTRANCE IS OFF OF IKEA PLACE, WHICH IS A PRIVATE STREET.

UH, EVENTUALLY AS THIS AREA DEVELOPS, YOU'LL NOTICE TO THE EAST IT'S, UH, VACANT.

THIS IKEA WAY WILL NEED TO BE EXTENDED.

IT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, BUT IS NOT PART OF THIS SITE.

UH, STAFF DID WANT THEM TO INCLUDE THAT BECAUSE THAT'LL IMPACT THE FLOW OF THE, THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT.

ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS A TRAIL, UH, ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY, AND THAT TIES INTO THE, THE TRAIL THAT WAS REQUIRED FROM, UH, ANDRETTI AND BASSPRO.

HMM.

I JUST DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU COULD DO THAT WITHOUT HAVING IT BEING AN ACTUAL STREET.

SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THAT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? IS THE APPLICANT GONNA BE HERE? YES.

THIS IS PRETTY EXCITING.

MM-HMM .

WHERE'S THE CLOSEST ONE OF THESE TO US? I BELIEVE THERE'S ONE IN FORT WORTH.

OKAY.

OH, THAT'S GREAT.

YEAH.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

MM-HMM .

YES.

JUST GENERAL.

HAVE WE EVER, IT'S INTERESTING.

HAVE WE EVER SEEN A TIMING STUDY IN MY SHORT TENURE HERE? TYPICALLY, THAT IS ALL DONE WITH A CIVIL REVIEW.

SO IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT STAFF NECESSARILY PRESENTS TO YOU.

WE DID WANNA MAKE A NOTE OF THAT BECAUSE THAT COULD IMPACT HOW THAT SITE IS DESIGNED.

OKAY.

GOOD QUESTION.

I THINK THAT'S IT.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM .

YES.

SO THE ITEM NUMBER NINE IS A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR VILLA AT BARDEN.

SO THIS LOCATION, THEY GOT 84 TOWNHOUSES APPROVED.

THE NEW, UH, THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED BY A ANOTHER HOME BUILDER, AND THEY JUST WANTED TO, UH, REVISE THE ELE APPROVE ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT THEIR BUILDING TYPES.

SO THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO NUMBER OF UNITS, DENSITY OR LANDSCAPES WHERE SITE PLAN, ANYTHING THAT WE APPROVE.

ONLY THING THEY ARE, UH, REQUESTING CHANGES TO BE APPROVED IS JUST THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.

OKAY.

SO THIS IS JUST TO KIND OF REMIND YOU OF HOW IT LOOKED LIKE WHEN WE APPROVED SITE PLANNING LANDSCAPE.

JUST AS A REMINDER, THIS IS THE LAYOUT.

OKAY.

SO THE, UH, ELEVATION ON THE TOP WAS WHAT WAS APPROVED, AND THE PROPOSED IS SHOWN BELOW.

SO I JUST WANNA POINT OUT THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY STAYING WITH THE PERCENTAGE OF MASONRY REQUIREMENTS.

UM, ONLY THING THAT THEY'RE CHANGING IS INSTEAD OF HAVING EACH UNIT HAVE THE ALTERNATING COLOR SCHEMES, THEY'RE TRYING TO EMPHASIZE THE, UH, UNIFORMITY OVERALL, BUT, UH, CREATE THE CONTRAST BETWEEN, UH, MASONRY MATERIAL AND NON MASONRY MATERIAL.

SO BASICALLY THEY ARE USING ALL BRICK AND STONE.

THEY'RE TRYING TO MAKE SOME DIFFERENCES BY PROVIDING LIKE A HERRINGBONE TYPE LAYOUT VERSUS JUST A SOLDIER COURSE VERSUS REGULAR,

[00:15:01]

UM, THEY ARE PROPOSING TO USE DIFFERENT COLOR SCHEME FOR ALL NON MASONRY MATERIALS, SUCH AS THE CANOPIES, WINDOW SHUTTERS, AND, UH, SO ON AND SO FORTH TO CREATE THE DIFFERENCES.

SO HERE IS THE COLOR SCHEME.

UH, I'M NOT SURE IT'S NOT, LET ME GO TO, OKAY, HERE YOU GO.

SO HERE IS THE PROVIDED ELEVATION.

LIKE I SAY, UM, THEY HAVE NOT REDUCED ANY OF THE PERSON IS THE MATERIALS.

THEY ARE STILL TRYING TO PROVIDE SOME ARCHITECTURAL ATTENTION BY USING DIFFERENT MATERIALS.

AND THEY, UH, HAVE PROVIDED THE COLOR SCHEME OF ALL THE DIFFERENT THINGS.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE GREENISH COLORS ARE ONLY BEING USED TO PAINT THE FRONT DOORS.

SO JUST DIDN'T WANNA YEAH.

ALERT YOU TOO MUCH THINKING THAT THAT WILL TAKE UP A WHOLE WALL.

OKAY.

WITH THAT SAID, THE, UH, P IS NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES, AND THE PROPOSAL DOES COMPLY WITH THE DIC REQUIREMENT.

THE APPLICANT PLANS TO BE HERE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR THE APPLICANT, THEY CAN ANSWER THAT.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER.

DID YOU SEND BACK OUT NOTIFICATIONS? SO THIS IS A SITE PLAN, MEANING, SO THIS, EVEN THIS PROJECT WENT THROUGH ZONE CHANGE YEAH.

TO GET THE PD AND THEN CAME WITH THE SITE PLAN.

AT THAT TIME, THE APPROVED ELEVATION WAS WHAT WAS ATTACHED TO THAT SITE PLAN REVIEW.

BECAUSE IT'S A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT, UH, WE'RE NOT REQUIRED TO SEND OUT LETTERS.

THAT'S THE STATE LAW.

WON.

BE THE PEOPLE HERE THEN? YEAH.

I MEAN, BUT WE DID POST THE SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY BECAUSE THAT'S PART OF THE REQUIREMENT.

SO THE APPLICANT DID POST THE SIGN ONE ALONG THE BAR, ONE ALONG, UH, I'M SORRY.

THE BARN AND THE MEGAN CARTA IS REQUIRED FOR ANY SITE PLAN REVIEWS.

MM-HMM.

IT'S JUST THAT, UH, PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION LETTERS ARE NOT REQUIREMENT FOR THE SITE PLAN APPROVALS.

MM-HMM.

MM-HMM .

CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE, UH, UH, ORIGINAL, UM, SLIDE THAT SHOWS THE PROPERTY? 'CAUSE I THINK IT'S RIGHT THERE BY THE FREEWAY, SO THERE'S NOT REALLY MUCH INTERACTION WITH ANYONE, BUT I WAS JUST CURIOUS, AREN'T THERE OTHER APARTMENTS OVER THERE AS WELL? MM-HMM .

NOT EVEN.

THERE'S APARTMENTS TO THE, TO THE WEST TO, YEAH.

I MEAN, A LOT.

I MEAN, A HUGE UNIT.

RIGHT.

BUT KEEP IN MIND, AS WE NOTED THAT THEY WOULDN'T NECESSARILY BE AFFECTED WITH THIS PROJECT.

LAST TIME WE HAD THIS PROJECT GO THROUGH THE ZONE CHANGE, THE SITE PLAN PROCESS, THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF RESIDENT INPUT MM-HMM .

UM, AND WHAT RESULTED WAS THE CHANGES IN THE UNIT COUNT ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDINGS, THAT'S ALL GONNA REMAIN.

MM-HMM .

ALL WE'RE LOOKING AT REALLY IS THE CHANGE OF THE FACADE, WHICH, IF YOU LOOK AT THE DIFFERENCES, IT'S A MORE CLEAN VERSION.

I THINK A SIMPLE SIMPLE AS OPPOSED TO YEAH.

THAT'S GOOD.

YEAH.

I, I WAS JUST THINKING ABOUT THE PROXIMITY FROM THE OTHER SET OF APARTMENTS.

I WAS JUST TRYING TO GET THAT IN MY HEAD HOW CLOSE IT WAS OR NOT.

OKAY.

WE DO HAVE SOME OTHER APARTMENTS TO THE NORTH THAT ARE APPROVED.

UM, BUT I'M NOT CERTAIN WHEN THAT WOULD BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

OH, WOW.

YEAH, THERE'S A LOT OF APARTMENTS.

SO WE HAVEN'T MET OUR QUOTA YET ON APARTMENTS.

UH, UH, WELL, ON THAT STREET, THERE'S A TON OF COMMISSIONER PARIS.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

MM-HMM .

UH, I KNOW THAT SIGNS WERE POSTED.

YES, MA'AM.

DID YOU RECEIVE ANY FEEDBACK FROM THE RESIDENTS? SO, ACTUALLY, 'CAUSE I DID.

SO I ACTUALLY REALLY? YES.

REALLY.

REALLY? AND I TOLD THEM I, I GOT SOME TODAY.

YES.

AND I GAVE THEM THE EMAIL.

OKAY.

SO WE DID RECEIVE INQUIRIES ABOUT PEOPLE ASKING WHAT THE CHANGES WERE.

MM-HMM .

AND WE WERE, YOU KNOW, POINTING THEM TO THE PACKET AND EVERYTHING.

WE HAVEN'T REALLY RECEIVED OPPOSITION OR SUPPORT IN MY, UH, AS FAR AS I KNOW WHEN WE CHECKED THIS MORNING.

WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY SINCE THEN.

RIGHT.

WE DID RECEIVE ONE, UH, WRITTEN OPPOSITION LATE THIS AFTERNOON.

THEY WERE IN OPPOSITION OF ANY MORE MULTIFAMILY, BUT THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCT.

OKAY.

YEAH.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS? I THINK THAT'S IT.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

BECAUSE I HAD, NOBODY'S CALLED ME, SO I WAS JUST, YEAH.

UM, IS THAT, IS THAT IT? THAT'S IT.

THERE BEING NO MORE BUSINESS.

SO I GUESS WE'RE GOING TO, UH, CLOSE OUT THE BRIEFING AT FIVE 50 AND RETURN AT 6:30 PM YES, MA'AM.

THANK YOU.

YEAH.

WELCOME TO THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

[Call to Order]

I'M CHERYL SMITH, CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING IS HEREBY CALL BACK TO ORDER AT 6:30 PM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETS THE SECOND AND FOURTH MONDAY OF EACH MONTH.

ALL MEETINGS ARE VIDEO RECORDED.

NO OFFICIAL ACTION CAN BE TAKEN UNLESS PROPER APPLICATION HAS

[00:20:01]

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOLLOWS A PRINTED AGENDA THAT IS AVAILABLE ONLINE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ARE ROUTINE ITEMS, WHICH CAN BE ALL APPROVED IN ONE MOTION.

HOWEVER, THE ANY MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION MAY MAKE A MOTION TO INDIVIDUALLY CONSIDER AN ITEM FROM THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA.

INDIVIDUALS MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA.

TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM OR NOTE YOUR SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION WITHOUT SPEAKING, PLEASE FILL OUT A REQUEST TO SPEAK CARD.

THESE CARDS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTER AND SHOULD BE TURNED IN AT THE BACK OF THE ROOM PRIOR TO THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM BEING CALLED, I WILL NOW CONDUCT A ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS TO CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM.

AFTER I CALL YOUR NAME, PLEASE SAY, HERE, CHERYL SMITH.

HERE.

MAX COLEMAN.

HERE.

ANNA COKA.

HERE.

CARL RAMIREZ.

FRANK GONZALEZ.

JOHN FEDCO.

HERE.

MICHELLE MADDEN.

JULIA PEREZ.

HERE.

QUENTIN.

PETE.

HERE, LET RECORD REFLECT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT EXCEPT FOR CARL RAMIREZ AND, UH, FRANK GONZALEZ AND MICHELLE MADDEN.

OKAY.

FINGERS ARE NOT WORKING TODAY.

AND NOW WE WILL HAVE, UM, COMMISSIONER JULIA PEREZ WILL GIVE THE INVOCATION AND I WILL LEAD IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IN THE US AND TEXAS FLAG.

PLEASE BOW YOUR HEADS.

HEAVENLY FATHER, WE COME TO YOU THIS EVENING ASKING FOR YOUR GUIDANCE, WISDOM, AND SUPPORT.

FILL US WITH YOUR GRACE, LORD, AS WE MAKE DECISIONS THAT MAY AFFECT THE RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS OF GRAND PRAIRIE.

BLESS THIS MEETING TODAY.

AND ALL THOSE PRESENT ALL THIS WE ASK IN YOUR PRECIOUS NAME.

AMEN.

MY PLEASURE.

TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

AND TWO, THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.

ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVIDUAL WITH LIBERTY AND I JUSTICE FOR ON MODERN I TO BE TEXAS.

ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE INDIVIDUAL IN AN EFFORT TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTIONS.

THE FOLLOWING MEETING GUIDELINES WILL APPLY.

THE STAFF WILL PRESENT FIRST ON ANY AGENDA ITEM.

FOLLOWING A BRIEF PRESENTATION BY STAFF, APPLICANTS WILL HAVE A COMBINED TOTAL OF 30 MINUTES TO PRESENT.

ONCE THE APPLICANT HAS SPOKEN, EACH MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WHO FILLS OUT A SPEAKER CARD WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM.

ADDITIONAL SPEAKING TIME MAY BE ALLOWED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRMAN BEFORE SPEAKING.

SPEAKER SHOULD GIVE THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD ALONG WITH WHOM YOU REPRESENT.

IF APPLICABLE, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON A TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA SHOULD SPEAK UNDER THE HEADING OF PUBLIC COMMENTS.

STAFF WILL BE AVAILABLE TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF EACH ITEM AT THIS TIME, CITIZENS MAY SPEAK FOR UP TO FIVE MINUTES ON ANY ITEM, NOT ON THE AGENDA.

DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR CITIZENS' COMMENTS? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

[PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT AGENDA]

MADAM CHAIR? YES.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10TH, 2023 P AND Z MEETING, AND ITEMS TWO THROUGH FOUR OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA BY COMMISSIONER COLEMAN.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PEREZ.

ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

MADAM CHAIR.

YES.

[5. SUP-23-03-0009 - Specific Use Permit - Next Step Warehouse (City Council District 1). Specific Use Permit for Auto Body Shop, Auto Repair (Minor), Specialty Auto Repair and Tuning, Auto Dealer (Internet Only), Auto Tire Repair, and Auto Tire/Wheels Sales and Installation. Lots 10-12 and 13R, Block A, Dalworth Park Addition, City of Grand Prairie, Tarrant County, Texas, zoned Commercial, and addressed as 2345 Dalworth St]

ITEM FIVE ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA THAT WE APPROVE THE, UH, UH, POSTPONEMENT TILL MAY 8TH.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO, FOR A POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 8TH FOR ITEM NUMBER FIVE BY COMMISSIONER COLEMAN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PEREZ.

ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HANDS.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE, MS. JUNE.

[6. STP-22-08-0041 - Site Plan - AMA Masonry at 414 Jesse Street (City Council District 1). Site Plan for an indoor contractor shop on 0.20 acres. Lot 7, Block A, Bell Crest Addition, City of Grand Prairie, Tarrant County, Texas zoned Commercial (C) and addressed as 414 Jesse Street]

THE ITEM NUMBER SIX ON THE AGENDA IS A SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A MA MASONRY STP 2 2 0 8 0 0 4 1.

SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,000 SQUARE FEET OR SO INDOOR CONTRACTOR SHOP, WHICH IS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONING AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO OUTSIDE STORAGE, THERE'S NO OUTSIDE DISPLAY, WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION.

SO, AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY'RE PROPOSING A BUILDING AND A PARKING AREA.

THEY ARE MEETING OUR, UM, DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT.

THEY ARE REQUESTING VARIANCES FOR THE PARKING.

BASED ON THE CALCULATION, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE

[00:25:01]

THREE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE SHOWS, TWO STREET TREES AND ONE TREES TO REMAIN ON SITE.

THEY ARE COMPLYING WITH THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.

HERE'S THE PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING.

YOU CAN SEE THE FRONT ELEVATION FEATURES DOOR AND WINDOWS FOR THE OFFICE AREA COVERED BY THE METAL AWNING, AND THEY HAVE A LITTLE ROLL-UP DOOR.

THEY ARE CONSISTING OF MASON CONSISTING OF, UH, SPLIT FACE CM U BLOCKS.

SO, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THAT THEY ARE REQUESTING A PARKING REDUCTION.

UM, THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE ALLOWED TO PROVIDE ONLY THREE PARKING SPACES, UM, WHICH IS TWO SPACES SMALLER THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED IS THE FIVE SPACES.

SO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY OTHER PROPERTIES FEATURING METAL WAREHOUSES, WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE CURRENT STANDARD, INCLUDING BUILDING SETBACKS, PARKING, OR LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT PER UDC.

THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE CONSISTS OF A HUNDRED PATIENT, A PERSON, ALLY, AND COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.

THEREFORE, STAFF DOES NOT OPPOSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR PARKING REDUCTION.

UM, THE DRT UH, COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

THIS CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.

IS THERE ANY QUESTION FOR STAFF COMMISSIONS? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I JUST HAVE ONE.

YES, MA'AM.

WITH REGARD TO THE PARKING, YOU SAID THAT THERE ARE FIVE REQUIRED AND THEY'RE ONLY WANTING TO DO TWO.

WHAT ABOUT IF THEY HAVE, UH, DELIVERIES OR ANYTHING? SO THEY, THEY'RE PROVIDING THREE.

OKAY.

UM, THE REASON THEY, THEY COULD NOT PROVIDE MORE PARKING IS, UM, IF YOU CAN SEE, THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER HERE, A ROLLOUT DUMPSTER.

OKAY.

SO THEY COULD TECHNICALLY PARK MORE CARS, BUT THEY COULD NOT CLAIM THAT AS A REQUIRED PARKING BECAUSE THEY NEED TO KEEP THAT SPACE OPEN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY FOR THE DUMPSTER TRASH PICKUP INSTEAD OF THE HAVING A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THEY GOT APPROVAL WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO SERVE THIS PROPERTY.

OKAY? MM-HMM .

COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

OKAY.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES.

THE APPLICANT ARE HERE? MM-HMM .

DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? MM-HMM .

I DON'T HAVE ANY FOR ITEM SIX.

WHAT DO Y'ALL WANT TO HEAR FROM THE OWNER WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK MA'AM? NO, SIR.

OKAY.

UM, THEY'RE FINE.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS AND, UH, I THINK COMMISSIONER SAY THEY DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

THE BRIEFING WENT WELL.

UM, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.

OKAY.

ON, UH, ITEM SIX OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

STP 22 DASH OH EIGHT DASH 0 4 1, UH, SITE PLAN FOR A MA MASONARY AND APPROVE IT, UH, WITH THE PARKING, UH, VARIANCE THEY REQUEST.

SECOND.

SECOND.

WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR FOR ITEM SIX STP 2 2 8 0 0 4 1 BY COMMISSIONER COLEMAN AND SECOND BY ANNA COCA.

UM, ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT CASE

[7. STP-23-02-0002 - Site Plan - Commissary at 130 Lakeview Dr (City Council District 3). Site Plan for a 2,300 sq. ft. commissary on 0.219 acres. A portion of Lot 2, Block H, Grand Prairie Prize Acres Addition, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas zoned PD-349A and addressed as 130 Lakeview Drive]

THE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN ON TONIGHT IS A SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR COMMISSARY AT ONE 30 LAKEVIEW DRIVE, STP 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 2.

SO THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED, UM, NORTH OF LAKEVIEW DRIVE.

THEY ARE PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A TWO, UH, 2200 SQUARE FOOT COMMISSARY.

UM, THE ZONING FOR THE PD 3 4 9 A WAS APPROVED WITH THE COMMISSARY USE AS A PERMITTED USE.

SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THE COMMISSARY CONSISTS OF COOKING AREA, VEGETABLE, UH, PREPARATION AREA, AND WALKING CLOSETS.

AND THEY HAVE PROVIDED THE REQUIRED PARKING AS SHOWN.

THE PARKINGS ARE GENERALLY LOCATED BEHIND THE BUILDING.

UM, THEY HAVE WORKED WITH TRANSPORTATION TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DRIVEWAY LOCATION AND, UM, EVERYTHING ELSE WORKED.

THEY HAVE MET THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT BY PROVIDING TWO STREET TREES THAT HAS SHOWN.

SO THIS IS A PROPOSED ELEVATION.

THEY ARE PROVIDING STUCCO.

THE COLORS WERE ADDED, UH, AS AN EMPHASIS JUST TO KIND OF COMMUNICATE THE DIFFERENCE IN MATERIAL.

THE PAINT COLOR IS NOT FIXED, SO, UH, THAT WILL BE UP TO THE APPLICANT TO THE SIDE, BUT I JUST WANT YOU TO SHOW YOU THAT THEY DO HAVE A STAR STOREFRONT LOOKING ELEVATION AT THE FRONT WHERE IT'S, UH, FACING THE STREET AND DOES HAVE A NICE, UH, METAL AWNING IN, UM, OVER IT.

SO THE, UH, APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES.

HOWEVER, THE DRC DOES, UH, RECOMMEND THE APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION.

I JUST WANTED TO EXPLAIN THAT.

THE, UM, DRC RECOMMEND CONDITION IS THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AT 1 38 LAKEVIEW DRIVE, AND A SHARED DUMPSTER AGREEMENT SHALL BE FILED AND RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF, UH, CO.

SO THIS IS KIND OF EXPLAINING WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO REQUEST.

SO THE PROPERTY TO THE, UM, IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST IS ACTUALLY CURRENTLY OWNED BY A SAME PROPERTY OWNER.

WHEN THIS WAS DEVELOPED, NO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES WAS PROVIDED.

SO THE ENVIRONMENT OF SERVICES MET WITH THE APPLICANT AND TRY TO WORK WITH A SOLUTION.

AS THE SITE

[00:30:01]

SO THE SOLUTION THAT THEY HAVE AGREED UPON IS TO PROVIDE A DUMPSTER LOCATION HERE TO BE SHARED BY ALL THREE BUILDINGS.

UM, THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE SHARED AGREEMENT IN CASE THAT IN THE FUTURE, IF THE PROPERTIES WERE SOLD INDIVIDUALLY TO DIFFERENT OWNERS, THAT WILL STILL ALLOW THE COMMISSARY PROPERTY OWNER OR THE TENANT TO STILL ACCESS THE DUMPSTER.

THAT CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.

THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE ONE QUESTION.

YES, MA'AM.

UM, WITH REGARD TO BEING A COMMISSARY, UM, I GUESS THEY HAD TO GO THROUGH CODE INSPECTIONS LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE AS FAR AS THE FOOD.

HOW DO OFTEN DO THEY DO THAT? YES, MA'AM.

SO I KNOW THAT IF WE, UM, HAVE LIKE A FOOD COOKING, OTHER THINGS, THEY USUALLY HAVE TO GO THROUGH OUR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MM-HMM .

TO MAKE THEIR REQUIREMENT, BUT ALSO THOSE FOOD SANITARY ISSUES, I BELIEVE THEY USUALLY HAVE TO MEET THE STATE REQUIREMENT AS WELL, IS MY UNDERSTANDING.

SO DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMISSARIES ANYWHERE? I DON'T HAVE EVER HEARD ANYBODY MENTION A COMMISSARY SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE.

YEAH.

NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF.

YEAH.

NO.

IT'S SOMETHING NEW.

YEAH.

OKAY.

YES.

UM, I THINK, NO MORE QUESTIONS.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE? HERE? YEAH.

HE DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT HE'S AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

COMM, COMMISSIONER, DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I THINK WE'RE, WE'RE GOOD ON, UH, NO QUESTIONS.

SO I GUESS, UM, MAKE A MOTION.

YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.

OKAY.

I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, FOR SITE PLAN, STP DASH 23 DASH ZERO TWO DASH 0 0 0 2 AND APPROVE WITH DRC CONDITIONS REGARDING THE SHARED DUMPSTER AGREEMENT WITH THE CO.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE ITEM SEVEN BY COMMISSIONER PEREZ AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLEMAN AS PER DRC.

RECOMMENDATIONS, UH, ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND PLEASE.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT ITEM.

ALRIGHT, THIS

[8. STP-23-02-0005 - Site Plan - BigShots Golf Entertainment (City Council District 2). Site Plan for an Amusement Services (Indoor) and Amusement Services (Outdoor) facility on 11.19 acres. A portion of Tract 2.2, William Reed Survey, Abstract No. 1193, City of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, zoned PD-436, within the SH 161 Corridor Overlay District, and addressed as 1015 Ikea Place]

UH, THE PLAN SHOULD LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU.

THE ZONING WAS APPROVED FAIRLY RECENTLY.

UH, SO THE PROPERTY'S OUTLINED IN RED ON THE SCREEN.

IT'S A SITE PLAN FOR AMUSEMENT SERVICES, BOTH INDOORS AND OUTDOORS.

AND IT'S LOCATED OFF OF IKEA PLACE.

IT'S WITHIN OUR 1 61 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT.

ON THE SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

AGAIN, IT'S THE BIG SHOTS GOLF FACILITY.

THEY'VE GOT A GOLF DRIVING RANGE, A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT, AND INDOOR PUTTING.

I DO WANNA POINT OUT THAT THE EXTENSION OF IKEA WAY IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED EVENTUALLY.

IT'S NOT PART OF THIS PROPOSED SITE PLAN.

UM, ON THE SCREEN YOU CAN SEE THEIR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, WHICH MEETS OUR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS.

AND THEN FINALLY, THESE ARE THEIR BUILDING RENDERINGS.

YOU CAN SEE THE GLASS CURTAIN WALL CREATES AN ARTICULATED PUBLIC ENTRANCE.

AND THEN FINALLY, THESE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.

UM, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE MENU ITEMS FROM APPENDIX F.

THEY'RE, UH, EXCEEDING THAT.

AND SO THEY ARE MEETING THOSE REQUIREMENTS.

THEY ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PARKING SPACES BY FOUR SPACES.

STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS.

AND FINALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION.

UH, FIRST IS THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED DETENTION TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE FLOW RATE, THE RECEIVING CREEK.

UNDER PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, THE DETENTION MAY BE LOCATED ON SITE OR OFFSITE.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A TIMING STUDY TO PROVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO DOWNSTREAM NEIGHBORS FACILITIES OR RECEIVING CREEKS.

AND THIS IS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 15 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE CITY'S DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL VOLUME ONE, UH, STAFF IS INCLUDING THIS AS A CONDITION.

UM, TYPICALLY WE DON'T, UH, DISCUSS THE CIVIL PLANS AT, AT THE SITE PLAN, BUT WE DID WANNA PROVIDE THIS CONDITION IN CASE THE REQUIRED DETENTION, UH, NECESSITATES SOME ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SITE PLAN.

AND SO THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? YOU DID PRETTY GOOD WITH THAT, .

THANK YOU.

SAVANNAH.

UM, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, MA'AM.

UH, WOULD Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR, I THINK YOU SHOULD JUST COME UP SO WE CAN SEE YOU, UH, CAN STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE, UH, RECORD WE JUST WANTED? YES.

YES, SIR.

DO YOU HAVE A CARD? UH, DID YOU HAVE A, DID YOU HAVE A SPEAKER CARD? YOU DIDN'T DO A SPEAKER CARD? I, I FILLED ONE OUT JUST IN CASE SOMEBODY HAD QUESTIONS TO YES.

WE JUST WANNA ASK YOU SOME, JUST A FEW.

JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

UH, TYLER BROWN.

UH, 2 8 7 WILDFLOWER.

I'M ACTUALLY SUNNY TEXAS, BUT I REPRESENT THE OWNER.

OKAY.

BIG SHOTS.

GOLF.

WELL, I JUST WAS, UH, WANTED TO SAY THAT I WAS REALLY HAPPY TO SEE YOU COME TO THE AREA AND, UM, JUST TRYING

[00:35:01]

UH, WE HAVE SEVEN LOCATIONS.

I JUST OPENED ONE IN AKRON, OHIO ABOUT, UH, SIX MONTHS AGO.

MM-HMM .

WE HAVE ANOTHER SEVEN IN DEVELOPMENT.

MM-HMM .

WHAT IS YOUR DETERMINING FACTOR TO CHOOSE YOUR SITES? UH, RANDALL COUSINS HANDLES THE REAL ESTATE SITE SELECTION MM-HMM.

AS WELL AS OPERATIONS.

SO I'M JUST THE VICE PRESIDENT, CONSTRUCTION.

MM-HMM .

HE'S ACTUALLY IN, UH, NAPLES, FLORIDA, WORKING ON A DEAL.

MM-HMM .

AND, UH, I WAS THE CHOSEN ONE, SO I'M .

WELL, WE'RE HAPPY YOU HERE, COMMISSIONER, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WE'RE JUST, UH, THANK YOU FOR, FOR THINKING OF GRAND PRAIRIE.

WE APPRECIATE THAT.

YES, MA'AM.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

UM, COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? CAN WE GET A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION, MAKE A MOTION.

WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, FOR STP DASH TWO THREE DASH ZERO TWO DASH 0 0 5 AND APPROVE WITH DRC RECOMMENDATIONS.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT, UH, BY COMMISSIONER PEREZ AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COCA, UH, AS PER DRC RECOMMENDATIONS, CAN WE GET A, UH, ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

NEXT ITEM.

[9. STP-23-02-0006 - Site Plan - Villas at Bardin (City Council District 4). Site Plan Amendment to revise building elevations for 84 townhomes on 10 acres. A portion of Block 4, Sheffield Village Addition, Phase IV, City of Grand Prairie, Tarrant County, Texas zoned Planned Development (PD 425) with Townhome uses located in the southeast corner of Bardin Rd. and Magna Carta Blvd. with an approximate address of 2801 W Bardin Rd]

THE ITEM NUMBER NINE FOR TONIGHT IS ANOTHER SITE PLAN AMENDMENT.

IT'S, IT'S TP 2 3 0 2 0 0 6.

REALIZE THAT BARDEN, SO THE ZONING AND THE SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED FOR THE BZA BARDEN TO ALLOW, UM, 84 TOWN HOMES.

THEY, UM, THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN PURCHASED BY ANOTHER HOME BUILDER, AND THEY NEEDED TO REVISE THE ELEVATION TO REFLECT THEIR BUILDING TYPES.

SO THIS IS THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.

THERE ARE NO CHANGES BEING MADE TO THIS, MEANING THAT THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS OR THE HOUSING TYPES OR DENSITY AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

SO THE ONLY, UM, CHANGES THAT ARE HERE FOR APPROVAL IS TO CHANGE THE ELEVATION IN THE BUILDING STATUS SHOWN.

SO THE TOP ONE SHOWS WHAT WE APPROVED.

THEY HAD MORE ALTERNATING COLORS OF, UM, BRICK AND STONE FINISHES DECORATING EACH BAY.

UM, THEY ARE KIND OF GOING MORE FOR A CLEANER UNIFORM LOOK.

HOWEVER, THEY ARE MAINTAINING THE PERCENTAGE OF MAINSTREAM AND MAINTAINING THE COMPLEXITY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BY ONE.

UM, SELECTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF STONE AND BRICK THAT ARE SIMILAR IN COLOR.

HOWEVER, WITH THE BRICK, THEY'RE USING THREE DIFFERENT, UM, UM, COURSES, TYPES, SOLDIER COURSE AND STRAIGHT COURSE, AND THE HERRINGBONE COURSE TO CREATE MORE COMPLEXITY.

AND THEY ARE ALSO USING, UM, SHUTTERS AND CANOPIES AND PORCHES TO MAINTAIN THE COMPLEXITY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PROVIDED WITH THE APPROVED ELEVATIONS.

IT'S SHOWN THEY ARE PRO, UM, PROVIDED THEY HAVE PROVIDED THE ELEVATION AND THE PROPOSED COLORS.

I JUST WANNA NOTE THAT THE FOURTH COLORS SHOWN WITH GREEN.

THOSE ARE JUST THE FRONT DOOR COLORS.

EVERYTHING ELSE WILL GENERALLY BE NEUTRAL TONE.

SO THE CONTRAST WILL BE BETWEEN THE MASONRY MATERIAL VERSUS NON MACING MATERIALS, SUCH AS BUILDING SHINGLES, UM, METAL ROOFS AND COLUMNS, AND, UH, SHUTTERS AND OTHER DETAILS.

UM, THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES AND THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN ACTUALLY COMPLIES WITH THE UDC REQUIREMENT AND THE PD REQUIREMENTS.

THE DRC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, UH, JUST FOR THE RECORD FOR THE PUBLIC.

WE DID RECEIVE A ONE OPPOSITION LETTER, BUT IT WAS MORE CONCERNING THAT THE, UM, THEY ARE OPPOSED TO MULTIFAMILY AS WE DISCUSSED DURING THE STEP BRIEFING.

HOWEVER, THIS PROJECT IS NOT CHANGING WHAT WAS APPROVED, WHICH IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY, UH, USE.

AND WE HAVE GOTTEN A FEW INQUIRIES, BUT THEY JUST DID NOT EXPRESS EITHER SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION OF THE PROJECT.

THIS CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.

I BELIEVE APPLICANT WAS GOING TO BE HERE, BUT I'M NOT SURE IF THEY'RE HERE.

OKAY.

OKAY.

YES, THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT, UH, PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU FILL OUT A SPEAKER CARD IF YOU HAVEN'T.

WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JUNE.

UM, JUNE, DO YOU WANT WE, JUNE, ARE THESE FOR, UH, RENT OR FOR OWNERSHIP? IT'S, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE, ORIGINALLY IT WAS FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP OF THESE TOWN HOMES.

UM, THE APPLICANT CAN CONFIRM THAT IS STILL REMAINING THE SAME.

HMM.

ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF? UH, DID, UH, WERE THERE ANY, UH, WELL, I GUESS I CAN ASK THE APPLICANT.

YES, MA'AM.

I CAN ASK THE APPLICANT.

OKAY.

YES.

YOU HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER? NO, SHE'S, SHE'S FILLING IT OUT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

YES.

UH, ALEX JOHNSON.

ADDRESS IS 400, OR, SORRY, TWO 11 WEST 10TH STREET, DALLAS, TEXAS.

UM, YES, SO I AM REPRESENTING THE, UH, APPLICANT IN THIS CASE.

I'M DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY GROUP.

AND I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

I HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR YOU.

UM, HAVE THERE BEEN ANY, I KNOW THIS WAS BOUGHT

[00:40:01]

UH, WE ARE UNDER CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY.

OKAY.

UM, WE HAVE NOT ENGAGED WITH THE COMMUNITY ON THIS.

UM, BUT, UM, WE, WE DON'T INTEND TO CHANGE THE ZONING.

SO WE, WE HADN'T MADE THAT ENGAGEMENT.

OKAY.

HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH UH, UH, COUNCILMAN LOPEZ? NO, MA'AM.

WE HAVE NOT.

OKAY.

I WOULD THINK THAT WOULD BE, YOU MAY WANNA DO THAT BEFORE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

ABSOLUTELY.

THANK YOU FOR THAT.

SO BASICALLY, UH, THERE'S NOT GONNA BE ANY, ANY CHANGES REALLY FROM WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY, UH, PROPOSED BEFORE.

BEFORE, NO, MA'AM.

WE, UH, WE WERE JUST PROPOSING, UM, DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS THAT, UM, ARE REFLECTIVE OF THE PRODUCT THAT WE ARE INTENDING TO BUILD.

UM, AND THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION THAT YOU HAD APPROVED.

MM-HMM .

COMMISSIONERS.

DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER PER JUST A REMINDER, ARE THIS GONNA BE FOR, UH, RENTAL OR OWNERSHIP? UM, WE INTEND TO HAVE THESE FOR RENT.

OH, RENTAL ONLY.

UM, YES MA'AM.

I THOUGHT THEY'RE INDIVIDUALLY PLOTTED HOMES.

UM, BUT OUR INTENT IS TO HAVE THEM AVAILABLE FOR LEASING, MAYBE WITH THE RENT, WITH THE POSSIBILITY TO OWN.

UM, WE'VE NOT EXPLORED THAT OPTION, BUT, UM, IT'S, IT'S, IT IS AVAILABLE.

COMMISSIONERS.

ANY ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? BECAUSE WE WERE UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THEY WERE TOWN HALL TOWN HOMES FOR SALE.

THAT'S WHAT WE THOUGHT.

SO THEY'RE GONNA BE INDIVIDUALLY DEEDED AND YOU'RE GONNA RENT THEM OUT INDIVIDUALLY, UM, INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED.

SO A INDIVIDUAL DEED FOR EACH LOT.

HOWEVER, ONE OWNER WOULD RETAIN ALL M 84 HOMES.

IS THAT A, SO IT'S STILL, WHAT SHE'S EXPLAINING IS IT'S STILL BUILT TO RENT, BUT THEY'RE STILL GONNA BE PLATTED INDIVIDUALLY.

WE USUALLY HAVE BUILT TO RENT ON ONE LARGE PARCEL, JUST LIKE MULTIFAMILY, BUT THEY'RE GONNA FOLLOW THROUGH WITH PLATTING H ONE INDIVIDUALLY.

BUT THERE'S STILL GONNA BE ONE PROPERTY OWNER FROM WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING.

YEAH, BUT IS THIS A END AROUND TO NO, I THINK IT'S JUST, I THINK THE PROPERTY'S ALREADY, IT'S BEEN PLATTED, SO I BELIEVE THEY'RE PROBABLY JUST RATHER THAN RE PLATTING TO ONE PROPERTY, THEY'RE GONNA PROBABLY KEEP IT AS IS.

BUT AS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THEY HAVEN'T STARTED CONSTRUCTION, THEY'RE WANTING TO DO IT BILL TO RENT.

UM, THIS IS A UNIQUE SCENARIO.

I'VE SEEN IT HAPPEN ONCE BEFORE.

I HAVE TO JUST SAY THAT THIS IS THE FIRST THAT WE'VE HEARD THAT Y'ALL HAVE CHOSEN TO GO BILL TO RENT.

SO WE, WE HAVE HAD A PRE, UM, PRE-DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH STAFF AND, UM, THAT WAS DISCUSSED.

SO I'M I NOT JUNE, WAS THAT DISCUSSED WITH YOU? THE ONLY CHANGE THAT THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH STAFF IS CHANGES TO THE ELEVATIONS.

THIS IS THE FIRST THAT WE'RE HEARING THAT'S MORE RENT.

RIGHT.

SO THIS IS PRETTY MUCH MULTI-FAMILY.

UM, WELL, NO MA'AM.

THEY'RE INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED HOMES AND SO THEY'RE NOT ON A SHARED LOT, WHICH IS THE DEFINITION OF MULTI-FAMILY.